Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for the Suppression of Tremor
NCT ID: NCT02087046
Last Updated: 2023-04-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
127 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-10-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will be included in the Pre-Market Approval Application to support the safety of this device in use.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Movement Disorders
NCT01581580
Elucidating the Temporality of Structural and Functional Connectivity Changes in Essential Tremor After Successful Deep Brain Stimulation to the Dentato-rubro-thalamic Tract
NCT04758624
Abbott DBS Post-Market Study of Outcomes for Indications Over Time
NCT04071847
Physiology, Imaging and Modeling of Essential Tremor
NCT03811405
Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Movement Disorders
NCT02119611
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Each patient will be screened and then undergo a baseline evaluation followed by unilateral or bilateral implantation of the DBS system. During the implantation procedure, each patient will undergo a trial of stimulation in the operating room. The device may be internalized after a successful intra-operative trial or at a later surgery (no later than 4 weeks after initial lead placement). If the device is not activated immediately postsurgery, the patient may return to the clinic to determine optimum stimulation programming. Device programming will be optimized in as many visits as necessary following implantation. The day that the device is fully implanted will be classified as "Day 0" for each patient.
After "Day 0" the patient will return to clinic for evaluations at, Day 90 (±14 days), and Day 180 (±14 days) and Day 365 (approximately 12 months ± 30 days after Day 0). These evaluations consist of the CRST, the QUEST, the SF36, Patient and caregiver Global Ratings and the Patient Satisfaction Rating.
At Baseline and Day 180, the CRST evaluation session will be video recorded for analysis by an independent evaluator unaware of the functioning of the device. Additionally, at the Day 180 visit, the physician will have the option to provide the patient with amplitude control. A comparison of measures within the same person from pre-treatment to post-treatment will be performed. Also, pre-treatment and post-treatment group means and standard deviations will be determined.
Patients completed follow-up visits as part of the original protocol (C-04-02) for one year (or in some cases longer if patient was bilaterally implanted) and continued to complete additional visits as part of the Long-Term Follow-up protocol (C-06-03) for up to 5 years post implant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stimulation
ANS Totally Implantable Deep Brain Stimulation System
ANS Totally Implantable Deep Brain Stimulation System
ANS Totally Implantable Deep Brain Stimulation System will be implanted in the VIM nucleus of the thalamus
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ANS Totally Implantable Deep Brain Stimulation System
ANS Totally Implantable Deep Brain Stimulation System will be implanted in the VIM nucleus of the thalamus
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient is over 18 years of age.
3. Patient is diagnosed with essential tremor for at least 3 years.
4. Patient has a disabling medical-refractory upper extremity tremor with no evidence of supraspinal central nervous system disease or injury (tremor not adequately controlled by medications for at least three (3) months before implant).
5. Patient has a postural or kinetic tremor severity score of at least 3 out of 4 in the extremity intended for treatment on the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor.
6. Patient will maintain a constant dose of anti-tremor medication indicated as best medical management for one (1) month prior to enrollment in study.
7. Patient is available for appropriate follow-up times for the length of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient has other clinically or medically significant disease;
3. Patient has any neurological injury or disease other than essential tremor;
4. Patient has any condition requiring repeated MRI scans;
5. Patient has any condition requiring diathermy;
6. Patients on anticoagulant medications;
7. Patient has untreated clinically significant depression;
8. Patient has had an electrical or electromagnetic implant (cochlear prosthesis, pacemaker etc);
9. Patient has had a prior thalamotomy or surgical ablation procedure in either side of the brain;
10. Patient has dementia interfering with their ability to co-operate or comply with study requirements or comprehend the informed consent (mini-mental exam score \<24);
11. Patient abuses drugs or alcohol;
12. Patient has had botulinum toxin injections in the six (6) months prior to enrollment;
13. Patient has a history of cranial surgery;
14. Patient has a history of seizures;
15. Patient has any metallic implants that may interfere with the functioning of the device (e.g. aneurysm clips);
16. Patient has a history of stimulation intolerance in any area of the body;
17. Patient is a female of child bearing potential with a positive urine pregnancy test or not using adequate contraception.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward Karst
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Abbott
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Loma Linda, California, United States
Pacific Hills Neurosurgery Medical Group
Pasadena, California, United States
University of San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Oakwood Hospital
Dearborn, Michigan, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Neurology Specialists of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C-04-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.