Observational Clinical Study on Elderly Patients With Fracture of the Proximal Femur Treated With the Chimaera Nail
NCT ID: NCT05197335
Last Updated: 2026-01-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
206 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-07-09
2022-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retrospective Study Chimaera Long Nail in Adult Patient
NCT06285981
Evaluation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation With Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fractures
NCT01235169
Influence of Static Distal Locking of a Short Proximal Femoral Nail
NCT06357312
Use of Cemented TFNA Nail Augmentation in the Treatment of Trochanterian Rock Fractures
NCT04993053
Cemented vs Non-cemented Semiendoprosthesis in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures
NCT00859378
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The enrolled patients, as would happen even if they did not decide to participate in this study, will proceed by undergoing the surgery necessary for the application of the medical device under observation (Chimaera), which coincides with the start of the treatment period.
After the surgery and the hospital discharge, the patient will undergo subsequent follow-up visits. The follow-up visits carried out respectively at 1 month and 3 months after the date of surgery, conclude the treatment period which, barring complications, is expected within 8 - 12 weeks from the date of surgery with the consolidation of the fracture of the proximal femur treated. Healing will be verified by the Investigator based on an X-ray check through which he/she will make a qualitative assessment of the bone density at the fracture site and the positioning of the bone stumps. Starting from the 3-month visit and up to 1-year visit, the Investigator will compile the Bowers \& Parker functional score (a measure of effectiveness) for the evaluation of the patient's functional recovery. The score obtained at the follow-up visits will be compared to the score compiled during the discharge visit representative of the pre-fracture patient's status.
For patients that undergo this treatment, the removal of the device is not planned except for serious adverse events that require a second surgery to complete the treatment of the fracture (safety measure). Once the treatment period has ended, the control period begins during which 2 visits will be made, respectively 6 months and 1 year after the date of the surgery. During these visits, clinical data will be collected to follow the evolution of the fracture consolidation and the functional recovery of the patient and the occurrence of any adverse events in the medium term.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Group
Age of 65 at the time of signing the informed consent.
Chimaera short nail (length = 180 mm) in combination with one or two telescopic cephalic screws
The enrolled patients will proceed by undergoing the surgery necessary for the application of the medical device under observation (Chimaera), which coincides with the start of the treatment period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chimaera short nail (length = 180 mm) in combination with one or two telescopic cephalic screws
The enrolled patients will proceed by undergoing the surgery necessary for the application of the medical device under observation (Chimaera), which coincides with the start of the treatment period.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* will have reached the age of 65 at the time of signing the informed consent;
* he/she will have been diagnosed with a fracture in the pertrochanteric, intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric region of the femur, stable or unstable, not previously treated;
* based on the investigator's judgment, he will have a regular indication for surgical treatment with an intramedullary nail;
* the fracture will be treated with the Chimaera short nail (length = 180 mm) and one or two telescopic lag screws, according to the manufacturer's instructions for use.
Exclusion Criteria
* he/she will have been diagnosed with a pathological fracture of oncological origin (primary tumor or skeletal metastasis);
* he/she will have been diagnosed with a fracture in the diaphyseal and/or distal region of the femur;
* he/she will have been diagnosed with an open fracture (type II and III according to the classification of Gustilo and Anderson) of the proximal femur;
* he/she will have been diagnosed with multiple fractures (including bilateral proximal femur fractures);
* in the pre-or intra-operative phase it will be decided to treat the fracture with the long version of the Chimaera nail and/or with non-telescopic cephalic screws (fixed length);
* will have a medical condition that constitutes a contraindication to treatment with Chimaera according to the manufacturer's instructions for use;
* will have a suspected or certified hypersensitivity/allergy to some component of the device that comes into contact with the patient;
* will present some clinical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, could interfere with the procedures of the Clinical Investigation or that could jeopardize the safety of the patient;
* at the same time he will be treated with an unauthorized device that cannot be removed without endangering the safety of the patient;
* will be participating in other clinical trials or had participated in other clinical trials in the 3 months before signing the informed consent.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Orthofix s.r.l.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ospedale Regionale EE 'Miulli'
Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy
A.O. Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano Caserta
Caserta, CE, Italy
A.O.U. Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele
Catania, CT, Italy
Ospedale S. Giuseppe
Empoli, FI, Italy
Az. Ospedaliero - Universitaria Careggi
Florence, FI, Italy
ASST di Mantova, Osp. Carlo Poma
Mantova, MN, Italy
Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano
Prato, PO, Italy
Ospedale di Vicenza
Vicenza, VI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Close JD, Swartz K, Deu R. Hip fracture in older patients: tips and tools to speed recovery. J Fam Pract. 2013 Sep;62(9):484-92.
Sheehan SE, Shyu JY, Weaver MJ, Sodickson AD, Khurana B. Proximal Femoral Fractures: What the Orthopedic Surgeon Wants to Know. Radiographics. 2015 Sep-Oct;35(5):1563-84. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140301. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
Innocenti M, Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F. Proximal femural fractures: epidemiology. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2009 May;6(2):117-9.
Orive M, Aguirre U, Garcia-Gutierrez S, Las Hayas C, Bilbao A, Gonzalez N, Zabala J, Navarro G, Quintana JM. Changes in health-related quality of life and activities of daily living after hip fracture because of a fall in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;69(4):491-500. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12527. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
Sciard D, Cattano D, Hussain M, Rosenstein A. Perioperative management of proximal hip fractures in the elderly: the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Jul;77(7):715-22. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, Lydersen S, Halsteinli V, Saltnes T, Lamb SE, Johnsen LG, Saltvedt I. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1623-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
Bowers TM, Parker MJ. Assessment of outcome after hip fracture: development of a universal assessment system for hip fractures. SICOT J. 2016;2:27. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2016018. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
ICJME. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OCI_1901
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.