Effectiveness of Kaltenborn Mobilizations Versus Muscle Energy Technique in Adhesive Capsulitis.
NCT ID: NCT05189626
Last Updated: 2022-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-06
2022-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Additional Effects of Thoracic Manipulation in Adhesive Capsulitis.
NCT04619173
Effectiveness of SCS Technique Verses ART in Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT05402540
Mulligan Mobilization Technique and Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and ROM
NCT04993092
Effects of the Myofascial Arm Pull With and Without Active Release Technique in Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT06108843
Spencer's Muscle Energy Technique and Cyriax Deep Friction Massage on Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT05398588
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Kaltonborn Mobilizations involves the application of a passive sustained stretch technique to enhance joint mobility without articular surface suppression. The forces applied to increase joint mobility are graded from I-III. Grade I applies a distraction of minor intensity that hardly causes stress within the joint capsule; it is often used to decrease pain. Grade II refers to a force that stretches the periarticular tissue; such stimulus is colloquially referred to as "taking up the slack." Finally, Grade III force causes enough distraction or gliding so that joint capsule can sufficiently stretch; it is often used for enhancing ROM.
MET is unique in its application as the client provides the initial effort while the practitioner facilitates the process. One of the main uses of this method is to normalize joint range, rather than increase flexibility, and techniques can be used on any joints with restricted Range of Motion (ROM) identified during the passive assessment. The main effects of MET can be explained by two distinct physiological processes: Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR) and Reciprocal Inhibition (RI). Post isometric contraction decrease muscle tone in single group of muscle after brief period of submaximal isometric contraction of same muscle.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Muscle energy technique
Muscle energy technique
Post Isometric relaxation(muscle energy technique) 3 days/ week for 4 weeks
Group B
Kaltonborn mobilizations
Kaltonborn mobilizations
Kaltonborn mobilizations grade II and III will be performed on Glenohumeral joints 3 days/ week for 4 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Muscle energy technique
Post Isometric relaxation(muscle energy technique) 3 days/ week for 4 weeks
Kaltonborn mobilizations
Kaltonborn mobilizations grade II and III will be performed on Glenohumeral joints 3 days/ week for 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Duration of complaint for more than 3 months.
* Gender: Both Male and Female.
* Patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder
* Patients having restriction in more than 2 ranges
* Patients with diabetes
Exclusion Criteria
* Shoulder girdle motor control deficit associated with neurological disorder.
* Any bony deformities acquired or congenital in glenohumeral joint.
* Patients with language barrier.
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Health Education Research Foundation (HERF)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aqsa Anwar, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rawalpindi Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Holy family hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
142/IREF/RMU/2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.