A Patient Decision Aid for Method of Early Abortion: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT ID: NCT05182008
Last Updated: 2025-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
365 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-05
2024-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Our research team has developed an online interactive patient decision aid on method of abortion based on international standards for decision aid development. We would like to investigate whether it leads to improved decisional quality in patients seeking early abortion.
Methods: Phase 1 will be development of an abortion knowledge assessment tool. We will start by developing ten multiple choice questions based on information that is classically included in abortion education material. The goal is to ultimately include 5-7 well-performing questions in the trial. The ten questions will be sent to content experts to answer and rate. They will rate the questions on representativeness and importance. The questions will also be administered to community members without specific abortion knowledge. Results will be used to assess content validity and discriminator validity and revise the questionnaire.
Phase 2 will be a randomized trial of people seeking abortion at less than 63 days gestation. Those who wish to participate will be randomized either the decision aid (study group) or the standard abortion clinic website (control). They will then be asked to participate in a survey immediately after they are finished reviewing the decision aid or website to. This survey will include questions about their decision, demographics, medical history, and their level of knowledge about abortion methods (by administering the knowledge assessment tool described above). The evaluation of the decision making will be measured using the Decisional Conflict Score. Four weeks post procedure, participants will be contacted by e-mail again and asked to complete a second survey identifying which type of abortion they underwent along with an inventory of perceived adverse treatment effects, as well as completing a Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Mifepristone/Misoprostol for Medical Abortion
NCT04905251
Intravenous Ketamine for Pain Control During First Trimester Surgical Abortion
NCT03751423
Pain Control In First Trimester Medical Abortion: A Randomized Trial
NCT01457521
Use of an Algorithm to Determine IV Sedation Dosing During First-trimester Surgical Abortion
NCT01994317
Study of Clinic-based Versus Self-use of Medical Abortion Pills
NCT03727308
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are tools to help patients make health-related decisions, particularly when no 'best' choice exist. Research shows that in comparison to usual care, decision aids have been shown to improve patient knowledge and risk perception, reduce decisional conflict, and promote shared decision making and value-congruent decisions (i.e. decisions that are in alignment with the patients stated values and priorities) Our research team has developed an online interactive patient decision aid on method of abortion based on international standards for decision aid development. We would like to investigate whether it leads to improved decisional quality in patients seeking early abortion.
Phase 1 will be development of an abortion knowledge assessment tool. This tool will be used in Phase 2 of the study to evaluate decision quality. We will start by developing ten multiple choice questions based on information that is classically included in abortion education material. The goal is to ultimately include 5-7 well-performing questions in the trial. The ten questions will be sent to content experts to answer and rate. They will rate the questions on representativeness (Overall how well does this question represent key facts that a patient should know before deciding about abortion method?) and importance (How important is this question for patients to understand to be considered informed?). The questions will also be administered to community members without specific abortion knowledge. Based on data from these surveys the questions will be revised. To ensure content validity, only questions the experts rate as sufficiently representative and important will be included. Discriminant validity will be evaluated by comparing the scores of content experts to those of community members. Only questions with adequate discriminant validity will be included. Content experts will be persons known to the primary investigator and will be recruited directly. Community members will be recruited online though social media (eg. Facebook). Both content experts and community members will complete an online consent form and online survey.
Phase 2 of the study will be integrated into the standard workflow of the Nova Scotia Women's Clinic. Patients are able to self refer to the clinic and during the initial intake phone call, they will be asked if they can be contacted by the research coordinator to discuss study participation. Those who agree will be contacted by the research coordinator to review the study and patients will be ask if they would like to participate in the they study. Those who wish to participate will be randomized and e-mailed a weblink to an online consent form and either the decision aid (study group) or the standard NSWCC website (control). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio within blocks of size 2, 4, and 6 (in random order). To further ensure the randomization is concealed, a statistician who is not on the study team will generate the sequence using the R package, blockrand. They will then be asked to participate in a survey immediately after they are finished reviewing the decision aid or website to. This survey will include questions about their decision, demographic information, medical history,and their level of knowledge about abortion methods (by administering the knowledge assessment tool described above). The evaluation of the decision making will be measured using the Decisional Conflict Score, which measures the quality of the decision making process and consist of question for which patients rate their experiences on a scale of strongly agree or disagree. Four weeks post procedure, participants will be contacted by e-mail again and asked to complete a second survey identifying which type of abortion they underwent along with an inventory of perceived adverse treatment effects, as well as completing a Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Decision Aid
Patients will be guided to an online interactive decision aid tool.
Decision aid
Online interactive decision aid on method of early abortion
Usual Care
Patients will be guided to visit the clinic website of the Nova Scotia Women's Choice Clinic.
Usual care
Patients will be directed to the abortion clinic website
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Decision aid
Online interactive decision aid on method of early abortion
Usual care
Patients will be directed to the abortion clinic website
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dalhousie University
OTHER
University of British Columbia
OTHER
IWK Health Centre
OTHER
Nova Scotia Health Authority
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Melissa Brooks
Obgyn
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Melissa Brooks
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dalhousie University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
QEII Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NSHA43377
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.