Patient Safety in the Operating Room: Helsinki Declaration Implementation in Ukraine
NCT ID: NCT05175976
Last Updated: 2022-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
176 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-01
2021-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transfer of Standard Operating Procedures in Anesthesiology
NCT04800796
Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety
NCT01246544
Information Transfer During Postoperative Handovers in the Post-anaesthesia Care Unit
NCT01973959
Effects of Checklists in Surgical Care - a Study on Complications, Death and Quality of Patient Administrative Data
NCT01872195
Retrospective Study on Perioperative Safety and Quality Control Based on Real World Data
NCT06003517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To conduct the survey, we formed a questionnaire of 24 items. The questionnaire was designed to ensure sufficient collection of data from respondents on demographics, awareness of the Declaration, and the use in the everyday practice of the measures recommended in it to promote patient safety. However, the structure of the questionnaire allowed people to fill it in a short time. We also provided respondents with more descriptive and detailed answers to some questions if they wished. The survey was conducted in Ukrainian. Practitioners-anesthesiologists, as well as heads of departments, employees of departments, were invited to participate in the survey.
The survey results were imported into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for further analysis. Simple descriptive statistics were used for demographic data and numerical answers to individual questions. The answers, which included the free text were grouped by topic using simple qualitative techniques.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
25 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bogomolets National Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kateryna Bielka
Assistant professor at the Department of OF SURGERY, ANESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE THERAPY OF POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Iurii Kuchyn, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Bogomolets National Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bogomolets NMU
Kyiv, , Ukraine
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Staender SE, Mahajan RP. Anesthesia and patient safety: have we reached our limits? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;24(3):349-53. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344d90c.
Horton JB, Reece EM, Broughton G 2nd, Janis JE, Thornton JF, Rohrich RJ. Patient safety in the office-based setting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Apr;117(4):61e-80e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000204796.65812.68.
Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF. The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):592-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833b1adf.
Balzer F, Spies C, Schaffartzik W, Pappert D, Wernecke KD, Kuhly R, Boemke W. Patient safety in anaesthesia: assessment of status quo in the Berlin-Brandenburg area, Germany. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;28(10):749-52. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328348ee35. No abstract available.
Wu HHL, Lewis SR, Cikkelova M, Wacker J, Smith AF. Patient safety and the role of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology: A European survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;36(12):946-954. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001043.
McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garratt A, Bond J. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(31):1-256. doi: 10.3310/hta5310. No abstract available.
Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Jun;15(3):261-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031.
Bielka K, Kuchyn I, Semenko N, Kashchii U, Pliuta I. Patient safety during anesthesia in Ukraine: national audit results. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 27;22(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01704-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
K44YB21yi7
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.