Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-06
2020-06-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Same-day Cardiac Surgery Cancellation
NCT04386733
How do Patients, Nurses and Physicians Perceive Negative Postoperative Events?
NCT00785096
Surgical Consent During the COVID-19 Pandemic
NCT04556604
Descriptive Study to Evaluate the Understanding Degree of Informed Consent in Surgical Procedures
NCT03960723
Impact of a Checklist on the Rate of Late Cancellation in Ambulatory Surgery
NCT01732159
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It was noted that consent forms within the Royal London Hospital Plastic Surgery department were often not correctly completed. A Quality Improvement Project was undertaken to improve the completion of consent forms within the department.
Materials and Methods Common problem areas on consent forms were identified and QI methodology was used to design the study including selection of appropriate outcome, process and balancing measures. Baseline information on completion of: 1) patient details, 2) consultant details, 3) legibility, 4) use of abbreviations in description of operation/complications, and 5) patient signatures was collected. Four weekly interventions were made which were accompanied by four further data collection cycles. A further re-audit took place 4 months following the completion of the project to establish whether improvements had been sustained.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Messages to departmental employees to improve quality of consent form completion
All interventions directed to members of the plastic surgery department: Intervention 1: Poster illustration common mistakes on consent forms. Intervention 2: Group message explaining Quality Improvement Project to the department. Intervention 3: Email from Consultant lead in support of project. Intervention 4: Further group message illustrating gains and ongoing goals of the project.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Barts & The London NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Stodell, FRCS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Barts and the Royal London NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BartsLondonNHS
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gillon R. Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2015 Jan;41(1):111-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102282.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
1\. Wai Hung Yau et al. Clinical Negligence Costs: taking action to safeguard NHS sustainability. BMJ 2020; 368 doi
2\. House of Commons Committee of public accounts. Managing the costs of clinical negligence in hospital trusts. Fifth report of session 2017-2019. (accessed 4th July 2020)
5\. Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines on Good Surgical Practice Sept 2014 section 3.5.1 'Consent'. (accessed 4th July 2020)
6\. Institute for Healthcare Improvement; Quality Improvement Essentials Toolkit. (accessed 4th July 2020)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
287762
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.