Segmental Spinal Anesthesia for Small-incision Cholecystectomy in a Field Hospital

NCT ID: NCT05165641

Last Updated: 2022-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-01

Study Completion Date

2017-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Providing safe and efficient anesthesia and in a field hospital is a challenging situation. This study investigated the feasibility and safety of thoracic spinal anesthesia for small-incision open cholecystectomy in a deployed field hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was conducted in a field hospital deployed in a rural area of the middle Atlas in Morocco during the winters of 2016 and 2017. The Middle Atlas is a part of the Atlas mountain range which is usually blocked and isolated by snow during the winter. The hospital deployed was an inflatable tent hospital self-contained and self-sufficient. This field hospital included the following components: a patient's ward (sixty beds), an operating theater with one surgical table, a recovery room with 2 beds, a laboratory, an X-ray unit, a pharmacy, and several exams rooms.

After approval by the Ethical review board of Avicenna Military Hospital, Marrakech, Morocco (CERB7/2016), written informed consent was obtained from patients who agreed to participate in the study.

The inclusion criteria were: uncomplicated symptomatic cholelithiasis confirmed by preoperative ultrasound, age 18 years or older and American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II or III. Exclusion criteria were: patients with acute cholecystitis, suspected common bile duct stones, previous abdominal surgery, bleeding diathesis, spinal abnormality, and allergy to any drug used in the study.

Patients were interviewed and examined by an anesthesiologist in a preoperative visit several days before surgery. On arrival in the operating room the patient's non-invasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate were monitored. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded every five minutes. Intravenous access was established in the forearm with an 18 Gauge catheter and patients received a preload with 10 ml/Kg of normal saline. Patients were given 1mg midazolam intravenously for anxiolysis and oxygen 2-3 l /min was administered by a nasal cannula. Cefazolin 2 g was injected as antimicrobial prophylaxis. Antiemetic prophylaxis was also carried out with dexamethasone 4 mg IV.

Spinal anesthesia was performed at a lower thoracic level with the patient in the sitting position. After local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine, the spinal puncture was done in the 10th thoracic intervertebral space (T 10) through a median approach. A 27 Gg pencil-point needle with an introducer was used (marquee). To identify T 10, the vertebra prominens (C7) was palpated and the spinous processes were palpated caudally. Two senior anesthesiologists performed all the spinal punctures. The progression of the spinal needle was cautious and soft. The effort was made to stop the needle progression just after the tactile perception of the dura mater. Once the flow of cerebrospinal fluid was obtained, 1.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 5mg/ml (=7.5 mg) mixed with 0.5 ml of fentanyl 50 µg/ml (= 25 µg) was injected and the spinal needle removed. Patients were asked to report any pain or paresthesia during the puncture. The patient was then placed in a supine horizontal position. The level of sensory block was assessed every 2 minutes (pinprick method). After an adequate sensory block was obtained (T4 - T 12), surgery was allowed to start. The nasogastric tube was not inserted unless the surgeon required it.

Patients were invited to report any discomfort or pain during surgery. Patients were asked to assess any eventual pain on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Perioperative pain scores were collected at skin incision and perioperative pain and anxiety were treated with boluses of fentanyl 50 µg (maximum 100 µg) and midazolam 1 mg (maximum 5 mg). The need for additional sedation/analgesia and the doses administered were recorded. Patients were informed about the possibility of switching to general anesthesia (GA). Criteria for conversion to GA were: failure of spinal anesthesia, pain score \> 4 despite a maximum dose of fentanyl, and difficult surgical conditions.

Two experienced surgeons performed all operations. Small incision open cholecystectomy was performed with a 6 to 8 cm long transverse incision over the right rectus abdominis muscle, as described by Rosenmuller \[ref\]. Surgeon s satisfaction was evaluated by asking surgeons to assess the operative conditions on a numeric scale of 0 to 10 (0: worst surgical conditions, 10: best operative conditions). At the time of skin closure, a wound infiltration (muscular compartment and subcutaneous fat) with 15 to 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25% was made.

The duration of surgery and perioperative incidents (hypotension, bradycardia nausea, and/or vomiting) were recorded. Hypotension defined as a drop in the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) ≥20% below baseline was managed by IV boluses of ephedrine 6 mg. Bradycardia was defined as heart rate \<50 and treated with atropine 0.50 mg. Post-operative events were also recorded: nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, headache, or neurologic symptom. Patients were discharged the day after the surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gall Stones (& [Calculus - Gall Bladder]) Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

segmental spinal anesthesia

thoracic spinal anesthesia at T 10 level

Group Type OTHER

segmental spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthesia was performed at a lower thoracic level with the patient in the sitting position. After local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine, the spinal puncture was done in the 10th thoracic intervertebral space (T 10) through a median approach. A 27 Gg pencil-point needle with an introducer was used (marquee). To identify T 10, the vertebra prominens (C7) was palpated and the spinous processes were palpated caudally \[ref}. Two senior anesthesiologists performed all the spinal punctures. The progression of the spinal needle was cautious and soft. The effort was made to stop the needle progression just after the tactile perception of the dura mater. Once the flow of cerebrospinal fluid was obtained, 1.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 5mg/ml (=7.5 mg) mixed with 0.5 ml of fentanyl 50 µg/ml (= 25 µg) was injected and the spinal needle removed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

segmental spinal anesthesia

Spinal anesthesia was performed at a lower thoracic level with the patient in the sitting position. After local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine, the spinal puncture was done in the 10th thoracic intervertebral space (T 10) through a median approach. A 27 Gg pencil-point needle with an introducer was used (marquee). To identify T 10, the vertebra prominens (C7) was palpated and the spinous processes were palpated caudally \[ref}. Two senior anesthesiologists performed all the spinal punctures. The progression of the spinal needle was cautious and soft. The effort was made to stop the needle progression just after the tactile perception of the dura mater. Once the flow of cerebrospinal fluid was obtained, 1.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 5mg/ml (=7.5 mg) mixed with 0.5 ml of fentanyl 50 µg/ml (= 25 µg) was injected and the spinal needle removed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* uncomplicated symptomatic cholelithiasis
* American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with acute cholecystitis
* suspected common bile duct stones
* previous abdominal surgery
* bleeding diathesis
* spinal abnormality
* allergy to any drug used in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Avicenna Military Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Younes Aissaoui, MD

Professor of anesthesia and intensive care medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Younes Aissaoui

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Avicenna Military Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPICHOL AvicennaMH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cholecystectomy During Weekends
NCT06559449 COMPLETED
Bile Aspiration vs Drain in Acute Cholecystitis
NCT03012243 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA