Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-15
2021-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Sevoflurane vs Desflurane on Mechanical Power in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07295158
Low Flow and High Flow Anesthesia on Thiol-Disulfide Homeostasis and IMA in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT04926480
Anesthesia With Propofol, Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine Infusions for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01833819
Effect of Desflurane Versus Sevoflurane With Recent Bio-markers on Renal and Hepatic Functions
NCT05027191
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine and Intravenous Remifentanil in Postoperative Pain Management in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07312877
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our aim is to investigate the effect of minimal flow anesthesia with sevoflurane on hemodynamics and arterial blood gas parameters in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations.
Material and Method: Seventy patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I-II between the ages of 18-65 undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. After the patients were randomly selected by computer, they were divided into two equal groups as Group M (minimal flow anesthesia group) with fresh gas flow 0,5 L.min-1 and Group C (high flow anesthesia/ control group) with fresh gas flow 4 L.min-1. In both groups. Demographic data, duration of anesthesia, operation times, recovery times, hemodynamic parameters and arterial blood gas parameters of all patients were recorded. The patient data collected in both groups were compared statistically.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group M
Group M is minimal flow anesthesia group with fresh gas flow 0,5 L.min-1. Thirty five patients with ASA class I-II and between the ages of 18-65 undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be included. These patients were planned to be administered sevoflurane anesthesia with 0,5 L.min-1 flow under general anesthesia.
Sevoflurane inhalant product
The sevoflurane dose differed in both groups in relation to the fresh gas flow. Since the fresh gas flow is less in group M, the concentration of sevoflurane consumed by the patient at the end of the case will be less.
Group H
Group H is high flow anesthesia group with fresh gas flow 4 L.min-1. Thirty five patients with ASA class I-II and between the ages of 18-65 undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be included. These patients were planned to be administered sevoflurane anesthesia with 4 L.min-1 flow under general anesthesia.
Sevoflurane inhalant product
The sevoflurane dose differed in both groups in relation to the fresh gas flow. Since the fresh gas flow is less in group M, the concentration of sevoflurane consumed by the patient at the end of the case will be less.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sevoflurane inhalant product
The sevoflurane dose differed in both groups in relation to the fresh gas flow. Since the fresh gas flow is less in group M, the concentration of sevoflurane consumed by the patient at the end of the case will be less.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The operation time between 60-180 minutes
Exclusion Criteria
* COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
* Severe liver and kidney disease,
* Diabetes mellitus
* Morbid obesity
* Alcohol and/or drug addiction
* Risk or history of malignant hyperthermia
* Pregnancy and lactation
* Emergency cases
* Operation time less than 60 minutes and longer than 180 minutes
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nebia Peker
medical doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nurcan Coşkun
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Serkan İslamoğlu
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nebia Peker
Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Doger C, Kahveci K, Ornek D, But A, Aksoy M, Gokcinar D, Katar D. Effects of Low-Flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Pulmonary Functions in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3068467. doi: 10.1155/2016/3068467. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
Park SY, Chung CJ, Jang JH, Bae JY, Choi SR. The safety and efficacy of minimal-flow desflurane anesthesia during prolonged laparoscopic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Dec;63(6):498-503. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.6.498. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Effects of Low-Flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Pulmonary Functions in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
The safety and efficacy of minimal-flow desflurane anesthesia during prolonged laparoscopic surgery
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.