Personalized Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Cognitive Fluctuations of Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB): Proof of Concept
NCT ID: NCT05138588
Last Updated: 2025-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-02
2028-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognitive Improvement in Dementia With Lewy Bodies
NCT07122908
rTMS for the Treatment of Affective Symptoms in Patients Suffering From Dementia
NCT05262868
Personalized rTMS for Resistant Depression
NCT02863380
TMS in Preclinical and Prodromal AD: Modulation of Brain Networks and Memory
NCT04294888
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Alzheimer Disease
NCT03270137
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* To provide a proof of concept by validating the hypoactivity (hypoperfusion) of the anterior insula ("AI biomarker") as a causal factor of the instability of arousal states in DLB.
* To evaluate if improvement of arousal translates clinically into a reduction of cognitive fluctuations and an improvement of other functional parameters (clinical measures of symptoms).
* Evaluation of the relevance of the AI biomarker as a predictive tool for clinical response.
* Assessment of reproducibility of the AI hypoperfusion (biomarker) at an individual level and thereby its potential as a diagnostic or therapeutic biomarker.
* Collection, description and analysis of all adverse events and required information for the implementation of future phase II and III studies
Methodological approach:
The present study will be conducted at the "non-invasive neurostimulation center of Strasburg" (Centre de Neuromodulation Non-invasive de Strasbourg ; CEMNIS) in collaboration with the Memory Clinic of Strasbourg (Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherches ; CM2R) of the University Hospitals of Strasbourg (HUS) and the ICube laboratory (Team IMIS, UMR 7357, CNRS). We propose a single-centre, two-arm, randomized, crossover, double-blind comparative study. N=40 patients will be prospectively recruited in order to create two experimental groups (arms) (Group A and Group B) in a cross-over study design, following two experimental phases (I and II). The protocol will include two rTMS conditions: (1) verum stimulation (target: insular cortex) and (2) control stimulation (target: occipital cortex). The running order for each participant will be counterbalanced: Group A will start with the verum rTMS in phase I, followed by the control rTMS in phase II. Group B will start with the control rTMS in phase I, followed by the verum rTMS in phase II. One phase of rTMS will consist of a total of ten visits. One visit will include two sessions of rTMS, summing up to a total of twenty sessions of rTMS for each patient. Participants will undergo multiple EEG recordings and multimodal cerebral MRI scans, as well as several different clinical assessments (self-reported, reported by the investigator and the patients' main caregiver) numerous times during the protocol, pre- and post-rTMS sessions. In sum, each patient will undergo five MRI scans and three clinical assessments. The clinical trial schedules a total of N=37 visits for each patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
For the investigators, the unblinding and the taking of knowledge of the subjects in each group will take place after the end of any experimental run, during the data processing phase. In the event of serious adverse events, the unblinding will be carried out before the end of the research.
For participants, the unblinding will take place at the end of the last follow-up visit of the study.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VERUM
In the "verum" experimental condition, participants will receive the experimental rTMS stimulation sessions, meaning the rTMS sessions targeting the insular cortex, taking into account the insular hypoperfusion (through MRI images) of each patient.
rTMS
For each subject, a verum condition and a control condition will be programmed. We will use the QPS-5 method (4 pulses, Inter-Stimulation Interval; ISI: 5 seconds).
CONTROL
In the "control" experimental condition, participants will receive the control rTMS stimulation sessions, meaning the rTMS sessions will target the occipital cortex.
rTMS
For each subject, a verum condition and a control condition will be programmed. We will use the QPS-5 method (4 pulses, Inter-Stimulation Interval; ISI: 5 seconds).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rTMS
For each subject, a verum condition and a control condition will be programmed. We will use the QPS-5 method (4 pulses, Inter-Stimulation Interval; ISI: 5 seconds).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Enrolled in a social health insurance scheme
* Diagnosed with probable DLB according to McKeith et al. criteria, 2017, or McKeith et al. 2020 criteria for the prodromal stage
* A Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE; Folstein et al., 1983) score ≥ to 18 in the last 6 months (prodromal stage or a major neurocognitive disorder (dementia syndrome) at moderate stage)
* MMSE score ≥ to 15 at the inclusion visit
* Presence of clinically significant cognitive fluctuations
* Caregivers of eligible patients do have to be able to stay with the patient for at least 4 hours a day, 3 days a week, and have to be able to provide requested information and accompany the patient to the certain visits.
* The patient must be able to understand the objectives and risks of the study and has to be able to give dated and signed informed consent. In the case of a designed guardian or curator, the guardian or curator will sign the consent.
* For women of childbearing age, effective contraception throughout the study is required
Exclusion Criteria
* Pharmacological treatment for cognitive fluctuations in DLB with dose modifications that have taken place less than 2 months before the first visit of the protocol (anticholinesterase and neuroleptics)
* Anti-epileptic drug treatment "Keppra" (Levetiracetam)
* History of psychosis or severe depression unrelated to DLB
* History of brain surgery (tumour removal, electrode implantation, certain strokes as judged by the investigator, oedema...)
* Patients with any contraindication for MRI scans (claustrophobia, pacemaker, cochlear implant, mechanical heart valve, metallic prostheses, neurostimulators, other non-removably implanted electronic medical devices etc.)
* Subject unable to understand the aims and risks of the study and patients unable to give full informed consent
* Having a MMSE score \< to 18 in the last 6 months (prodromal stage or mild to moderate dementia)
* MMSE score \< to 15 at the inclusion visit
* Patients in an emergency or life-threatening situation
* Patients under court protection
* Pregnancy
* Breastfeeding
* Patients in exclusion period (determined by a previous or current study)
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frédéric BLANC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
8238
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.