Postoperative Analgesic Benefit of iPACK Block in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05136352

Last Updated: 2023-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-13

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomised clinical trial evaluates the analgesia provided by an iPack block associated with an adductor canal block in patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, compared to an adductor canal block alone. The objective is to prove the superiority of this locoregional anesthesia in terms of analgesia and functional rehabilitation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ideal loco-regional anesthesia for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction ensuring a satisfying analgesia without compromising an early rehabilitation is still undetermined.

Femoral nerve block has been incriminated in a delayed postoperative mobilization whereas the adductor canal block gives an equivalent analgesia for a better preservation of the quadricipital muscular strength.

The iPACK block (infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) is a recently described technique. Few studies have assessed the iPACK block in ACL reconstruction, and none were randomized.

This randomized single blind clinical trial compares two groups of 45 patients who undergo ACL reconstruction surgery under general anaesthetic : one receives an iPACK block associated with an adductor canal block, and the other only has an adductor canal block.

Pain scores and opioid consumption are collected after surgery in the recovery room, then by telephone interview at 24 and 48 hours post-surgery. Functional rehabilitation is evaluated by scales (KOOS, LYSHOLM and iKDC) at 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery. Adverse effects, due to anesthesia or opioids, are collected from 30 min after loco-regional anesthesia until the second phone call at 48h post-surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

adductor canal block

loco-regional analgesia with adductor canal block (ACB) method (for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction )

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

adductor canal block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

loco-regional anesthesia using adductor canal block

iPACK block

loco-regional analgesia with iPACK block (infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) ((for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction )

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

iPACK block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

loco-regional anesthesia using infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

adductor canal block

loco-regional anesthesia using adductor canal block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

iPACK block

loco-regional anesthesia using infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACB

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* ACL repair surgery under general anesthesia
* Person affiliated or beneficiary of a social security plan
* Free, informed and written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* Contraindication to ALR (allergy to local anesthetics, local infection of the puncture site, coagulopathy)
* Pre-existing opiate dependence
* Contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
* Pregnant or potentially pregnant women
* Patients under the protection of adults (guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice)
* Patients whose cognitive state does not allow evaluation by the scales used
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Toulouse

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fabrice FERRE, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Toulouse

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ferre F, Boussaguet L, Vari N, Pillard F, Bosch L, Ferrier A, Ba C, Tissot B, Menut R, Kurrek M, Labaste F, Cavaignac E, Minville V. Comparison of femoral triangle plus iPACK blocks with femoral triangle block alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled clinical trial on postoperative pain and knee function. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Mar 7:rapm-2024-106108. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106108. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40055004 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-A01226-35

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RC31/21/0167

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IPACK Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03692858 UNKNOWN PHASE2