Canadian Anaphylaxis Network- Predicting Recurrence After Emergency Presentation for Allergic REaction

NCT ID: NCT05135377

Last Updated: 2025-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1682 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-11

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of allergy that rapidly affects multiple body systems and can be deadly. The highest incidence of anaphylaxis is in children and adolescents. In Canada, approximately every 10 minutes there is an Emergency Department (ED) visit for food allergy, and up to 80% of anaphylactic reactions in children are triggered by food. The ambiguity in how physicians manage anaphylaxis adds a huge burden to health care and further contributes to ED crowding. Current Canadian and international treatment guidelines universally recommend that all patients present to the ED for a prolonged period (6-24 hours) of in-hospital monitoring after initial reactions have been treated, to increase detection of biphasic anaphylaxis (BA). BA is a second wave of symptoms after initial resolution. These guidelines are based on poor or little evidence and have unintended negative impacts on patient safety and quality of life. Furthermore, this 'one-size fits all' approach to care leads to wasteful resource utilization that provides low value care.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the study is to derive a clinical prediction rule that identifies children with anaphylaxis who are at risk of BA.

METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study will enroll 1682 patients from 7 pediatric EDs that are members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) network. We will enroll patients \< 18 years of age presenting to the ED with an allergic reaction that matches the diagnostic criteria of anaphylaxis. Research assistants (RA) present in the ED will screen, obtain consent, and prospectively collect all study data. The Research Assistant or Research Nurse will follow patients during their ED visit and ascertain, in conjunction with the medical team, if the patient developed biphasic anaphylaxis in the ED. A standardized follow-up survey conducted within 2-5 days of ED or hospital discharge will determine if a biphasic reaction occurred following ED disposition. We established an advisory council comprised of end-users and community partners external to the project team to monitor project milestones.

STUDY TEAM: We have established an international multidisciplinary team of experts in pediatrics, emergency medicine, allergy/immunology, research methodology and statistics, and knowledge translation. Our team is supported by the PERC network.

EXPECTED OUTCOME: Providing the best evidence-based, value care at the lowest cost is a moral and ethical imperative. Therefore, in alignment with national and international research priorities, we propose to develop a robust prediction model for BA. This model will address a significant gap in current knowledge and practice, with anticipated benefit for patient care and health system efficiency worldwide. This trial will generate novel, clinically relevant data on optimal ED management of children with anaphylaxis that integrates best value care with patient safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anaphylaxis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Children with Anaphylaxis

Patients under 18 years of age presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with an allergic reaction that matches diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis.

Observational

Intervention Type OTHER

Not applicable - observational study

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Observational

Not applicable - observational study

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients \< 18 years of age presenting to the ED with an allergic reaction that matches diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis as defined by the World Allergy Organization (WAO) in 2019. The 2019 WAO anaphylaxis guidelines clarify the involvement of two organ systems to diagnose anaphylaxis, stating that "although the diagnosis of anaphylaxis usually depends on the involvement of multiple organ systems, anaphylaxis may present as an acute cardiac or respiratory event as the only manifestation of anaphylaxis." Thus, a patient with isolated hypotension, bronchospasm, or upper airway obstruction after exposure to a known or potential trigger will be deemed to have anaphylaxis, even if typical skin features are absent.
* Language proficiency in English or French

Exclusion Criteria

* Anaphylactic reaction that occurred in the context of a suicidal attempt or intoxication
* Anaphylactic reaction that begins in hospital and managed outside ED (on an inpatient or outpatient unit)
* Patient who is unable to complete the follow-up survey post ED discharge.
* Previous enrollment in the CAN-PREPARE Study
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stollery Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Western Ontario

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alberta Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

CHU Ste-Justine, Montreal

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Waleed Alqurashi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Waleed Alqurashi

Assistant Professor, MD, MSc, FAAP, FRCPC

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Waleed Alqurashi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Amy C Plint, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Marcus S Shaker, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alberta Children's Hospital

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Stollery Children's Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Western Ontario

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alqurashi W, Shaker M, Wells GA, Collins GS, Greenhawt M, Curran JA, Zemek R, Schuh S, Ellis A, Gerdts J, Kreviazuk C, Dixon A, Eltorki M, Freedman SB, Gravel J, Poonai N, Worm M, Plint AC. Canadian Anaphylaxis Network-Predicting Recurrence after Emergency Presentation for Allergic REaction (CAN-PREPARE): a prospective, cohort study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e061976. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061976.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36316072 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTO 3721

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Molecular Basis of Food Allergy
NCT01832324 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Project 500 CHILD Study
NCT03225534 UNKNOWN
Peanut and Tree Nut Desensitization
NCT03532360 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
FMXIN002 in Patients at Risk of Anaphylaxis
NCT07045701 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2/PHASE3