Can Epinephrine Coated Syringe for Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Reduce Large Local Reaction?

NCT ID: NCT03963115

Last Updated: 2020-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-24

Study Completion Date

2019-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Allergen immunotherapy is effective in the management of allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis, and stinging insect hypersensitivity. The most common side effect of subcutaneous allergen specific immunotherapy (SCIT) is local reactions (LR). Although some studies indicated that LR did not predict systemic reaction (SR), patients with higher frequency of large local reaction (LLR) were reported to have higher risk for SR. Epinephrine may decrease LLR due to its vasoconstrictive effect . The objective of this study was to compare the size of LLR in patients receiving SCIT with epinephrine or normal saline coated syringe. The patients who complained of frequent LLR despite pre-medication and local treatment were recruited.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an immune mediated treatment which modifies T helper (Th) 2-directed response through the interplay between regulatory T and B cells, blocking IgG4 antibodies and tissue effector-mediated mechanisms. Aeroallergen immunotherapy is recommended for patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis or allergic asthma whose symptoms were not adequately controlled by antigen avoidance and pharmacotherapy. AIT could reduce symptoms and medication usage in respiratory allergy. In children, AIT prevented the progression from allergic rhinitis to asthma and prevented new onset of allergen sensitization in monosensitized patients. The administration of allergen by subcutaneous injection (SCIT) is a common practice among allergists.

The benefits of SCIT must be weighed against the risks of side effects which can be mild or life threatening. Adverse allergic reactions to SCIT were classified as either local (LR) or systemic reactions (SR).6 Large local reactions (LLR) are defined as erythema and/or swelling (\> 25 mm) at the site of injection. The timing of adverse reactions were categorized into immediate (occurring within 30 min) and late reactions (occurring \> 30 min after injection). LR associated with SCIT ranged from 26-72% of patients and 0.7-4% of injections. SR were reported to occurred in 3.7% of patients and 0.3% of injection. Recent prospective study in pediatric patients who received SCIT showed immediate LR in 54.6%, delayed LR in 56.1%, immediate SR in 2.2% and delayed SR in 7.4% of the patients. Severe SR were seen in 0.03% of all treatments which appeared within 30 minutes after the injections. The author concluded that children had similar rates of LR compared to adult patients but had lower rates of severe SR.

Several studies indicated that individual LR did not predict subsequent SR. The rate of SR were not change despite the dose adjustment after a LR. However, patients with greater frequency of LLR might be at an increased risk for future SR. Recognizing the significance of frequent LLRs is important for designing safer protocols for successful SCIT.

In the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, we performed SCIT in approximately 100 patients and 2000 injections per year. The LR associated SCIT were complained in 75% of the patients. Of the patients who experienced LR, 80% had LR more than 25 mm which was considered LLR.

Many strategies to prevent or minimize LR were reported. Oral antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) or anti-IgE could reduce LR during the built-up phase. Cold compression or topical steroid were used to reduce the LR without any strong evidence. To our knowledge, the benefit of epinephrine coated syringe prior to drawing the allergen extract for SCIT in patients with frequent LLR has never been explored in any controlled trial.

The objective of this study is to compare the size of LR in patients with frequent LLR who receive SCIT by coating syringe with epinephrine or placebo prior to drawing allergen extract.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Injection Reactions Site Systemic Reactions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial with epinephrine coated syringe before injected and placebo was done in each visit in patients who developed large local reactions after subcutaneous immunotherapy.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either epinephrine or normal saline (placebo) coated syringe for SCIT by a block of 4 randomization. These syringes were used to draw allergen extracts. The syringes for the second visit were coated with different agents from the first visit in the same patients. One investigator (K.B.) generated the allocation sequence and prepared the coated syringes. The physicians who drew and injected the allergen shots and the patients were blinded to the assignment from the beginning to the end of the interventions. Interventions were decoded at the end of the study by K.B.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Coated syringe with epinephrine

Epinephrine was coated syinge before drawing the allergen to filled in.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epinephrine or normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.

placebo

Normal saline was coated syinge before drawing the allergen to filled in.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Epinephrine or normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epinephrine or normal saline

epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Adrenaline or normal saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 6 years old who received SCIT at Pediatrics allergy departments at Siriraj hospital
* Patients who develops larges local reactions(mean wheal diameter \> 25 mm.) during SCIT.
* Patients who received SCIT in maintenance phase.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who develops systemic reactions (more than grade 1) during SCIT.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Orathai Piboonpocanun

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Orathai Piboonpocanun, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Siriraj Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orathai Piboonpocanun

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Roy SR, Sigmon JR, Olivier J, Moffitt JE, Brown DA, Marshall GD. Increased frequency of large local reactions among systemic reactors during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Jul;99(1):82-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60626-6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17650835 (View on PubMed)

Calabria CW, Stolfi A, Tankersley MS. The REPEAT study: recognizing and evaluating periodic local reactions in allergen immunotherapy and associated systemic reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Jan;106(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.10.025.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21195945 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

393/2561(EC3)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bioavailability of Nasal Epinephrine
NCT04696822 COMPLETED PHASE1