Can Epinephrine Coated Syringe for Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Reduce Large Local Reaction?
NCT ID: NCT03963115
Last Updated: 2020-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-24
2019-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With Modified Allergen Extracts
NCT01012752
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Patients Sensitized to Phleum Pratense
NCT01489033
Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT)
NCT01012882
Safety Study of Anti-IgE Immunotherapy in Allergic Patients
NCT00439621
Sublingual Immunotherapy in Children With Allergic Rhinitis
NCT01506843
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The benefits of SCIT must be weighed against the risks of side effects which can be mild or life threatening. Adverse allergic reactions to SCIT were classified as either local (LR) or systemic reactions (SR).6 Large local reactions (LLR) are defined as erythema and/or swelling (\> 25 mm) at the site of injection. The timing of adverse reactions were categorized into immediate (occurring within 30 min) and late reactions (occurring \> 30 min after injection). LR associated with SCIT ranged from 26-72% of patients and 0.7-4% of injections. SR were reported to occurred in 3.7% of patients and 0.3% of injection. Recent prospective study in pediatric patients who received SCIT showed immediate LR in 54.6%, delayed LR in 56.1%, immediate SR in 2.2% and delayed SR in 7.4% of the patients. Severe SR were seen in 0.03% of all treatments which appeared within 30 minutes after the injections. The author concluded that children had similar rates of LR compared to adult patients but had lower rates of severe SR.
Several studies indicated that individual LR did not predict subsequent SR. The rate of SR were not change despite the dose adjustment after a LR. However, patients with greater frequency of LLR might be at an increased risk for future SR. Recognizing the significance of frequent LLRs is important for designing safer protocols for successful SCIT.
In the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, we performed SCIT in approximately 100 patients and 2000 injections per year. The LR associated SCIT were complained in 75% of the patients. Of the patients who experienced LR, 80% had LR more than 25 mm which was considered LLR.
Many strategies to prevent or minimize LR were reported. Oral antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) or anti-IgE could reduce LR during the built-up phase. Cold compression or topical steroid were used to reduce the LR without any strong evidence. To our knowledge, the benefit of epinephrine coated syringe prior to drawing the allergen extract for SCIT in patients with frequent LLR has never been explored in any controlled trial.
The objective of this study is to compare the size of LR in patients with frequent LLR who receive SCIT by coating syringe with epinephrine or placebo prior to drawing allergen extract.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Coated syringe with epinephrine
Epinephrine was coated syinge before drawing the allergen to filled in.
Epinephrine or normal saline
epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.
placebo
Normal saline was coated syinge before drawing the allergen to filled in.
Epinephrine or normal saline
epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epinephrine or normal saline
epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who develops larges local reactions(mean wheal diameter \> 25 mm.) during SCIT.
* Patients who received SCIT in maintenance phase.
Exclusion Criteria
6 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Orathai Piboonpocanun
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Orathai Piboonpocanun, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Siriraj Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orathai Piboonpocanun
Bangkok, , Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Roy SR, Sigmon JR, Olivier J, Moffitt JE, Brown DA, Marshall GD. Increased frequency of large local reactions among systemic reactors during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Jul;99(1):82-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60626-6.
Calabria CW, Stolfi A, Tankersley MS. The REPEAT study: recognizing and evaluating periodic local reactions in allergen immunotherapy and associated systemic reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Jan;106(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.10.025.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
393/2561(EC3)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.