Biomarker Screening for Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Using Microneedle Patch in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis
NCT ID: NCT05922176
Last Updated: 2025-03-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-22
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Immunotherapy requires periodic monitoring, such as analyzing immunological changes through sample collection and determining the dose and cycle of administration, because the treatment period is long and individual immune responses are different. Existing methods for confirming immune responses in samples used invasive skin biopsy and blood collection methods, but in-blood evaluation indicators have the disadvantage of being ineffective as initial efficacy evaluations or predictive evaluations before treatment. In addition, skin biopsy should be performed by a specialist, and there is a disadvantage that resistance occurs because the patient's pain is accompanied, and scars or bruises may remain. Therefore, since it is a biopsy through minimal invasion compared to a tissue biopsy, the investigators would like to use a method of collecting skin samples through a microstructure (micro needle patch), a method that has little pain and no scars. Through this study, RNA is obtained from patients with house dust mite allergic rhinitis through minimally invasive skin samples, and immunotherapy response evaluation biomarkers are screened according to immunotherapy implementation, and its use as an indicator of immunotherapy prognosis in allergic diseases.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intratonsillar Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis
NCT06523478
Microbial Study of Sublingual Immunotherapy Spray in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis
NCT06741787
Influences of Allergic Rhinitis and Allergen Immunotherapy on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination
NCT05009134
Efficacy Study of Sublingual Immunotherapy to Treat Ragweed Allergies
NCT00599872
The Treatment of Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis With Electroacupuncture Combined With Microneedle Knife
NCT06890260
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Immunotherapy is known as the only way to change the natural course of allergic diseases by increasing the amount of substances that cause allergic reactions to allergic patients from a small amount and reducing allergic reactions through repeated administration for three to five years. Immunotherapy treatments include hypodermic injections, hypodermic tablets, and hypodermic fluids, and each has its pros and cons. Subcutaneous injection immunotherapy requires regular visits to a medical institution for injection, and there is a risk of anaphylaxis. Although sublingual immunotherapy has a low risk of anaphylaxis, it is cumbersome to administer it daily at home, and the incidence of local allergic reactions in the oral cavity is high due to 30 to 70 times less absorption in the body than injection treatments. Transdermal absorption immunotherapy (DF19001) that can compensate for the shortcomings of these existing immunotherapy drugs is currently under clinical research in Korea (Serbans Hospital IRB No. 4-2021-1345).
These immunotherapy require periodic monitoring, such as analyzing immunological changes through sample collection and determining administration dose and cycle, because the treatment period is long at 3-5 years and individual immune responses are different. Most of the existing methods for confirming immune responses in samples used invasive skin biopsy or blood collection methods, but allergen specific IgE (allergen specific IgG4, blocking factors) have the disadvantage of being ineffective as an initial efficacy evaluation or a pre-treatment prediction evaluation of a subject. In addition, various analysis methods can be used through skin biopsy to see changes in the initial immune response of the inoculation site, but this must be performed by a specialist, and has the disadvantage of being resistant to patient pain and scarring or bruising.
Therefore, in order to overcome these difficulties through this clinical study, the investigators would like to use a method of collecting skin samples through a microstructure (micro needle patch). When the microstructure patch is applied to the skin surface for 5 minutes, it passes through the microstructure's fine needle (\<0.5 mm long) keratin layer and enters the inside of the skin as shown in the image below. Various immunological indicators are analyzed by collecting skin factors remaining in the patch by applying the patch for a sufficient time for various factors in the epidermis and dermis layer to be adsorbed through the microstructure that has entered the skin.
Since this method is a biopsy through minimal invasion compared to conventional tissue biopsy, there is little pain and no scarring, and previous studies have confirmed that a small amount of RNA can be separated from skin samples using microstructure patches and microarray can be performed. In addition, in the same way, the detection of protein biomarkers according to the test collection method for determining treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis was observed.
Therefore, this study aims to obtain RNA from patients with house dust mite allergic rhinitis through minimally invasive skin samples, screen the biomarker for immunotherapy response evaluation through immunotherapy and confirm its use as an indicator of immunotherapy prognosis in allergic diseases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patient group of House dust mist allergic rhinitis
1. Adult male and female patients aged 19 to 60 with allergic rhinitis caused by the antigen of the American house dust mite (It is judged that the positive for the house dust mite is MAST ≥ Class 3 or ImmunoCAP® ≥3.5 kUA/L)
2. Moderate-severe persistent rhinitis when evaluated according to ARIA (Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma)
3. A person who has signed a written consent to participate in this clinical trial at his/her own discretion after fully explaining the purpose, contents, characteristics of the test drug, and expected adverse reactions prior to participation in the clinical trial
Evaluation of clinical indicators, Sample collection before& after immunotherapy
A. Evaluation of clinical indicators before immunotherapy
1. Symptom Scale for Rhinitis: Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Rhnitis Quality of Life Questionnaire(RQLQ)
2. American house dust mite-specific immunogloblin G4 (sIgG4)
3. American house dust mite-specific immunogloblin E (sIgE)
B. Sample collection before immunotherapy
1. Skin: Skin test using minimally invasive microstructure patch stripping method
2. Blood: Measurement of blood immunological indicators (Th2, Treg-related cytokine and blocking factor, etc.)
C. Evaluation of clinical indicators 4 to 6 months after immunotherapy
: Treatment is performed for about 4 months, and the progress of treatment is evaluated through the evaluation of the following clinical indicators.
same as examination in 'A'
D. Sample collection after 4 to 6 months of immunotherapy same as examination in 'B'
control group
1. Adults 19 years of age or older who are judged to be free from skin diseases or allergic diseases through medical examination and visual observation by a specialist
2. A person who agrees to provide samples derived from the human body
3. A person who voluntarily agreed to this study and prepared a consent form after approval of the IRB
Sample collection before& after immunotherapy
B. Sample collection before immunotherapy
1. Skin: Skin test using minimally invasive microstructure patch stripping method
2. Blood: Measurement of blood immunological indicators (Th2, Treg-related cytokine and blocking factor, etc.)
D. Sample collection after 4 to 6 months of immunotherapy
1. Skin: Skin test using minimally invasive microstructure patch stripping method
2. Blood: Measurement of blood immunological indicators (Th2, Treg-related cytokine and blocking factor, etc.)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evaluation of clinical indicators, Sample collection before& after immunotherapy
A. Evaluation of clinical indicators before immunotherapy
1. Symptom Scale for Rhinitis: Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Rhnitis Quality of Life Questionnaire(RQLQ)
2. American house dust mite-specific immunogloblin G4 (sIgG4)
3. American house dust mite-specific immunogloblin E (sIgE)
B. Sample collection before immunotherapy
1. Skin: Skin test using minimally invasive microstructure patch stripping method
2. Blood: Measurement of blood immunological indicators (Th2, Treg-related cytokine and blocking factor, etc.)
C. Evaluation of clinical indicators 4 to 6 months after immunotherapy
: Treatment is performed for about 4 months, and the progress of treatment is evaluated through the evaluation of the following clinical indicators.
same as examination in 'A'
D. Sample collection after 4 to 6 months of immunotherapy same as examination in 'B'
Sample collection before& after immunotherapy
B. Sample collection before immunotherapy
1. Skin: Skin test using minimally invasive microstructure patch stripping method
2. Blood: Measurement of blood immunological indicators (Th2, Treg-related cytokine and blocking factor, etc.)
D. Sample collection after 4 to 6 months of immunotherapy
1. Skin: Skin test using minimally invasive microstructure patch stripping method
2. Blood: Measurement of blood immunological indicators (Th2, Treg-related cytokine and blocking factor, etc.)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Adult male and female patients aged 19 to 60 with allergic rhinitis caused by the antigen of the American house dust mite (It is judged that the positive for the house dust mite is MAST ≥ Class 3 or ImmunoCAP® ≥3.5 kUA/L)
2. Moderate-severe persistent rhinitis when evaluated according to ARIA (Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma)
3. A person who has signed a written consent to participate in this clinical trial at his/her own discretion after fully explaining the purpose, contents, characteristics of the test drug, and expected adverse reactions prior to participation in the clinical trial B. Control group (Normal person)
<!-- -->
1. Adults 19 years of age or older who are judged to be free from skin diseases or allergic diseases through medical examination and visual observation by a specialist
2. A person who agrees to provide samples derived from the human body
3. A person who voluntarily agreed to this study and prepared a consent form after approval of the IRB
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients who are taking drugs that may affect efficacy evaluation (but can participate if there is no change in the drug taken during the study period)
2. Within six months of participation in the study, other clinical trial drugs or biological equivalence test drugs, biological agents (e.g. Anti-IgE) were administered
3. If there is a skin disease or tattoo in the area where the medication is applied
4. Immunosuppressive therapy or systemic steroid therapy for acute and chronic inflammatory skin diseases
5. A person in charge of testing or a person in charge of testing deemed inappropriate to participate in the test due to other reasons B. Control (Normal person)
<!-- -->
1. Patients with allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis or allergic asthma and rhinitis
2. A person who voluntarily disagrees with this study after approval of the IRB and has not completed the consent form
19 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
OTHER_GOV
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Park Kyung Hee
Clinical Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kyung Hee Park
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2023-0353
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.