Single Dose of Antenatal Corticosteroids for Pregnancies at Risk of Preterm Delivery (SNACS)

NCT ID: NCT05114096

Last Updated: 2026-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

3254 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-20

Study Completion Date

2029-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) reduce the risks of neonatal death and morbidities in preterm infants, such as respiratory distress syndrome.

The standard of care for pregnant people at risk of preterm birth includes 2 doses of Celestone (for a total of 24 mg in Canada, or 22.8 mg in Australia) to accelerate fetal lung maturity.

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial to determine whether half the usual dose (12 mg in Canada, or 11.4 mg in Australia) of Celestone is non-inferior to the standard double doses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preterm infants are at risk of mortality and morbidity. Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) reduce the risks of neonatal death and morbidities, such as respiratory distress syndrome.

The standard of care for pregnant people at risk of preterm birth includes 2 doses of Celestone to accelerate fetal lung maturity (total 24 mg in Canada, 22.8 mg in Australia). There are no published clinical trial data on the benefits or risks of a single dose of antenatal corticosteroid vs. standard double doses (Ninan et al JOGC 2020).

Pregnant people at 22 weeks and 0 days to \< 34 weeks and 6 days' gestation at risk of preterm birth with a singleton or twin gestation who have received the first dose of Celestone and consented to the trial will be randomized to receive approximately 24 hours later either an experimental placebo injection (of normal saline) or the standard double dose of Celestone to determine whether the intervention is non-inferior for the primary outcome of a composite of perinatal mortality or substantial morbidity.

Please note: Based on Health Canada's' guidance the study phase is 'Other: Off-Label use'. However, on the clincaltrial.gov record, 'Phase 4' is selected as this is the most relevant phase and there is no option to select 'Other'.

Please note: McMaster University, Canada is the Canadian Regulatory Sponsor and Overall Sponsor, and the University of Adelaide Australia is the Australian Sponsor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Birth Premature Birth Complication of Prematurity Obstetric Labor, Premature Pregnancy Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multicentre, blinded, pragmatic, 2 arm non-inferiority RCT
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-Dose Celestone

Having already received the first dose of Celestone as part of eligibility criteria, participants randomized to the experimental "Single-Dose" arm will receive a similar appearing placebo injection.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Celestone + placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

After the first intramuscular injection of Celestone, participants randomized to the "Placebo Comparator" group will receive 1 intramuscular injection of placebo.

Double-Dose Celestone

Having already received the first dose of Celestone as part of eligibility criteria, participants randomized to the "Double-Dose" arm will receive the standard 2nd dose of Celestone injected intramuscularly (i.e. they will receive the standard double-dose regimen).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Celestone + Celestone

Intervention Type DRUG

After the first intramuscular injection of Celestone, participants randomized to the "Active Comparator" group will receive 1 intramuscular injection of Celestone.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Celestone + Celestone

After the first intramuscular injection of Celestone, participants randomized to the "Active Comparator" group will receive 1 intramuscular injection of Celestone.

Intervention Type DRUG

Celestone + placebo

After the first intramuscular injection of Celestone, participants randomized to the "Placebo Comparator" group will receive 1 intramuscular injection of placebo.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant people, aged 18 to 55 years old, at risk of preterm birth with a singleton or twins between 22 weeks and 0 days and \<34 weeks and 6 days gestation who have received only a single dose of Celestone within 24 hours
2. Capable of giving informed, written consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindication to corticosteroids
2. Systemic corticosteroids for medical conditions during the pregnancy (e.g. lupus, severe asthma, Covid, etc).
3. Previous participation in this trial (in a previous pregnancy)
4. Known severe/life-threatening fetal or pregnant patient condition (e.g. fetal congenital/chromosomal abnormality)
5. Demise of one or more fetuses after 14 weeks and 0 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sunnybrook Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Women's and Children's Hospital, Australia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical Research Future Fund

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Adelaide

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarah D McDonald, MD,MSc,FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

Kellie Murphy, MD,MSc,FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Alberta Health Services; University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Royal Columbian Hospital

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Fraser Health, University of British Columbia; Jim Pattison Outpatient Care and Surgery Centre

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of British Columbia; BC Women's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Victoria General Hospital

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of Manitoba; St. Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital

Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

The Moncton Hospital, Horizon Health Network

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Memorial University, Eastern Health

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Dalhousie University; Izaak Walton Killam Health

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital Health Sciences Centre

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Western University; London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Ottawa; The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'est de l'Ile de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

McGill University, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital; McGill University

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Université Laval, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

(CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS); Université de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Saskatchewan, Regina General Hospital

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sarah D McDonald, MD,MSc,FRCSC

Role: CONTACT

905-525-9140 ext. 26622

SNACS Coordinating Centre

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ninan K, Morfaw F, Murphy KE, Beyene J, McDonald SD. Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes of Lower Versus Standard Doses of Antenatal Corticosteroids for Women at Risk of Preterm Delivery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Jan;43(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.02.127. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32660867 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2020.02.127

Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes of Lower Versus Standard Doses of Antenatal Corticosteroids for Women at Risk of Preterm Delivery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3764

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Vascular Effects of High-Salt After Preeclampsia
NCT06749418 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1