Identification of Dysglycemia With Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Assess Clinical Evolution in Cystic Fibrosis
NCT ID: NCT05099939
Last Updated: 2024-11-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
121 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-11-25
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to identify patients at risk and to implement early therapeutic measures, an annual CFRD screening test is recommended for CF patients after 10 years of age. The standard 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the recommended screening test. However, this test is perceived by both patients and CF care teams as unpleasant while adding a significant burden and workload, resulting in screening rates lower than 50% in most centers. An ideal alternative test should be simpler, less invasive, more sensitive than an OGTT to establish risks for lung function and/or nutritional deterioration, and predict future CFRD risk. To date, compared to the OGTT, no alternative screening method has demonstrated its effectiveness. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is emerging as a possible alternative method.
In patients living with CF, CGM is easy to use and can identify early dysglycemia, which in turn, can predict increased risk of accelerated decline of pulmonary function and/or weight, higher risk of pseudomonas colonization, and future risk of CFRD. However, these observations are based on studies of small sample size with very limited prospective data. Furthermore, many of the multiple CGM metrics that have been standardized are based on the risk of complications associated with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.
Thus, there is a need for prospective studies to identify the CGM metrics and the cut-off level that is relevant as a predictor of clinical deterioration and/or CFRD risk in CF. The identification of such CF-specific criteria would provide important information to target at-risk patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nutritional, Metabolic and Respiratory Status in Cystic Fibrosis
NCT00476281
Glycemic Monitoring in Cystic Fibrosis
NCT02211235
The Effects of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Dysglycemia and Body Composition in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes
NCT05723445
Diet, Physical Activity and Glucose Tolerance in Cystic Fibrosis. Exploratory Study.
NCT04249466
Simplification of CF-related Diabetes Screening at Home
NCT03227094
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To do this, the following will be evaluated:
* The clinical condition of the patients over a period of 5 years (2 years before, up to 3 years after inclusion);
* The detailed glycemic profile using a CGM system during 3 visits (on inclusion, 1 year, then 2 years after inclusion).
The primary objective is to identify which CGM variable, at inclusion in the study, is the most strongly linked to the risk of a decrease in pulmonary function of more than 2% / year measured by the FEV1% over the 5 years of follow-up of the study. The investigators will also i) investigate which CGM variables are most strongly linked to other clinical markers (ex. nutritional status, CFRD diagnosis and pulmonary exacerbations; ii) assess the association between changes in CGM variables (ex. increased number of glycemic excursions \>11.0 mmol/L over 2 years) and changes in clinical status over time; and iii) evaluate the correlation between plasma glucose values during the standard routine OGTT and CGM values.
This study includes 3 visits with participants: inclusion (V1), the visit at 1 year (V2), then 2 years after inclusion (V3).
This study consists of 3 phases:
* Phase 1: A retrospective file-based data collection, which covers 2 years before inclusion;
* Phase 2: Prospective data collection, including the installation of a CMG 3 times over a period of 2 years, then;
* Phase 3: An additional one-year prospective data collection on file only.
Only phase 2 includes visits for the participant. A CMG system will be installed for 14 days at inclusion (visit 1), at 1 year (visit 2) and 2 years (visit 3) during a regular routine visit and / or an annual OGTT visit. The participants' only involvement will be to wear the CMG system and return it to the research center at the end of the 14-day period. All data obtained during a routine visit will be collected directly from medical records over a period of 5 years (two years before inclusion until the final visit): pulmonary function (FEV1), nutritional status (weight and height), bronchial colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, number of exacerbations, number of intravenous antibiotic courses, number of hospitalizations, and annual OGTT results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be 18 years of age or older
* Have given clear and informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Have had a lung or liver transplant
* Participate in a randomized controlled trial for more than 3 months in parallel with this study
* Currently pregnant
* Patients under legal protection (for centers in France)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
OTHER
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
OTHER
Fondation Francophone pour la Recherche sur le Diabete
OTHER
Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal
Laurence Kessler
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU de Strasbourg
Isabelle Durieu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, , France
CHU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Remi Rabasa-Lhoret
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ProspeC-F
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.