Integrative Body-Mind-Spirit Group Intervention for Infertile Couples

NCT ID: NCT05091450

Last Updated: 2022-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

356 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a two-arm, with equal randomization, parallel randomized controlled trial. It compares the efficacy of a couple-based Integrative Body-Mind-Spirit (I-BMS) group intervention to a waitlist control group in improving dyadic couple flourishing and fertility-related quality of life among couples who are diagnosed of infertility in Hong Kong. It also aims to investigate the dyadic associations between infertile husbands' and wives' baseline primary outcomes and changes in primary outcomes following the intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Infertility is a global public health issue, affecting approximately 15% of childbearing-aged couples around the world. It is often a challenging dyadic life experience that generates adverse impacts on the psychosocial well-being of couples at childbearing age. Numerous psychosocial interventions have been developed for infertile women, and their efficacy and effectiveness were supported empirically. This study attempts to address the limitations incurred in existing psychosocial interventions for infertility by: (1) including infertile men and couples who have not sought fertility treatment and (2) incorporating relational outcomes within psychosocial interventions for infertile couples. This is a two-arm, with equal randomization, parallel randomized controlled trial. It compares the efficacy of a couple-based Integrative Body-Mind-Spirit (I-BMS) group intervention to a waitlist control group in improving dyadic couple flourishing and fertility-related quality of life among couples who are diagnosed of infertility in Hong Kong. It also aims to investigate the dyadic associations between infertile husbands' and wives' baseline primary outcomes and changes in primary outcomes following the intervention.

On hundred and seventy-eight infertile couples will be recruited through hospitals, clinics and local communities in Hong Kong. Each prospective couple will complete an online screening survey. Eligible couples will complete the baseline assessment, and then be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 into one of the two arms. Arm 1 is the couple-based I-BMS intervention for infertility, which consists of four 3-hour sessions within one month. Arm 2 is the waitlist control. Randomization will be performed by a computer. All eligible couples will be contacted by a research assistant for a pre-group interview prior to the commencement of the I-BMS intervention. The primary outcomes are changes over the measurement points in dyadic couple flourishing and fertility quality of life. The secondary outcomes include changes over the measurement points in empathy towards partner, partnership, relationship satisfaction, anxiety, depression, infertility-related blame, and resilience. Assessments are administered at baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up, and 5-year follow-up. Structural equation modelling will be employed to examine the efficacy of the couple-based I-BMS intervention based on the intention-to-treat principle, as well as the dyadic association between infertile husbands' and wives' primary outcomes.

Eight hypotheses are generated. First, it is hypothesized that, after controlling for baseline dyadic couple flourishing, couples in the I-BMS intervention group will report significantly higher dyadic couple flourishing than their counterparts in the waitlist control group following the intervention. Second, it is hypothesized that, after controlling for post-intervention dyadic couple flourishing, couples in the I-BMS intervention group will report significantly higher dyadic couple flourishing than their counterparts in the waitlist control group at one-month follow-up. Third, it is hypothesized that, after controlling for baseline dyadic fertility quality of life, couples in the I-BMS intervention group will report significantly higher dyadic fertility quality of life than their counterparts in the waitlist control group following the intervention. Fourth, it is hypothesized that, after controlling for post-intervention dyadic fertility quality of life, couples in the I-BMS intervention group will report significantly higher dyadic fertility quality of life than their counterparts in the waitlist control group at one-month follow-up. Fifth, it is hypothesized that wives' baseline fertility quality of life is predicted by their own and their husbands' baseline couple flourishing. Sixth, it is hypothesized that husbands' baseline fertility quality of life is predicted by their own and their wives' baseline couple flourishing. Seventh, it is hypothesized that wives' post-intervention improvements in fertility quality of life is predicted by their own and their husbands' post-intervention improvements in couple flourishing. Eighth, it is hypothesized that husbands' post-intervention improvements in fertility quality of life is predicted by their own and their wives' post-intervention improvements in couple flourishing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Couple-based I-BMS intervention for infertility

The I-BMS intervention will be conducted face-to-face and in group format. It comprises four 3-hour sessions within one month. Two registered social workers who are professionally trained on I-BMS intervention model will deliver the intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Couple-based I-BMS intervention for infertility

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

It is based on the previous I-BMS intervention for women undergoing IVF treatment, and aims to improve fertility quality of life and couple flourishing by (1) increasing awareness of the interconnectedness between physical and psychosocial well-being, (2) practicing body-mind-spirit techniques, (3) facilitating personal growth and partner empathy and compassion, and (3) creating the shared meaning of life, family, children. As a strength-focused and meaning-oriented approach, it utilizes experiential and self-reflective exercises to help participants reconstruct the meaning behind their ordeal and rediscover the strengths that keep them going.

Waitlist control

Couples allocated in the waitlist control group will begin the I-BMS intervention (same as the intervention group) after completing the 1-month follow-up assessment.

Group Type OTHER

Couple-based I-BMS intervention for infertility

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

It is based on the previous I-BMS intervention for women undergoing IVF treatment, and aims to improve fertility quality of life and couple flourishing by (1) increasing awareness of the interconnectedness between physical and psychosocial well-being, (2) practicing body-mind-spirit techniques, (3) facilitating personal growth and partner empathy and compassion, and (3) creating the shared meaning of life, family, children. As a strength-focused and meaning-oriented approach, it utilizes experiential and self-reflective exercises to help participants reconstruct the meaning behind their ordeal and rediscover the strengths that keep them going.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Couple-based I-BMS intervention for infertility

It is based on the previous I-BMS intervention for women undergoing IVF treatment, and aims to improve fertility quality of life and couple flourishing by (1) increasing awareness of the interconnectedness between physical and psychosocial well-being, (2) practicing body-mind-spirit techniques, (3) facilitating personal growth and partner empathy and compassion, and (3) creating the shared meaning of life, family, children. As a strength-focused and meaning-oriented approach, it utilizes experiential and self-reflective exercises to help participants reconstruct the meaning behind their ordeal and rediscover the strengths that keep them going.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* are in a heterosexual marriage
* are clinically diagnosed of infertility
* are actively trying to conceive
* are able to understand, read and speak Chinese
* age 18 or above
* give consent to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria

* are being exposed to intimate partner violence within the past 12 months (HARK test score \>=1)
* have signs of early psychosis within the past 12 months (Screen for Early Psychosis score = 2)
* have suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks (Beck Depression Inventory II, item 9, score \>= 2)
* already have a living child or children
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Celia Hoi-Yan Chan

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Celia Hoi-Yan Chan, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Celia Hoi-Yan Chan, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(852) 3917 2089

Victoria Ka-Ying Hui, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(852) 3917 1832

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Celia Hoi-Yan Chan, PhD

Role: primary

(852) 3917 2089

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EA210488

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mindful Yoga for Older Adults and Caregivers
NCT06095037 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Couples' Affect in Relationships Study
NCT06907654 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Nonviolent Communication for Parents
NCT06943105 RECRUITING NA