Long Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

NCT ID: NCT05088278

Last Updated: 2023-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-07-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of various anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. This assessment is necessary for the current context of anterior cruciate ligament research as several techniques and grafts are used in clinical practice, however, the various studies existing in the literature focus mainly only on the direct comparison of two techniques and usually with short-to-medium term follow-up. Since gonarthrosis is one of the most debated consequences of cruciate ligament reconstruction, a comparison of different long-term procedures would be desirable to have a clearer picture of the risks and benefits associated with different types of intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the beginning, the Database of our Institute is consulted, all the patients that underwent ACL reconstruction at least 15 years ago are selected. The original group will be divided into subgroups based on the surgical technique adopted, of the different techniques we took into consideration only these three: anatomical ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon, anatomical ACL reconstruction with hamstrings, non-anatomical ACL reconstruction "Over-the-top plus lateral plasty". The patients will be contacted to ask if they are interested to take part in the study; at least 25 patients for each group will be recruited. All the patients recruited will sign an informed consent about the study and the personal data treatment. After consent acquisition, patients will undergo a clinical examination and a questionnaire about pain and knee status will be administered; moreover, a radiographical examination of the operated knee will be performed to assess the osteoarthritis progression. Patients that reported graft rupture will be registered as failures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HS

Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadruple-bundle hamstrings graft

BPT

Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon

Over-the-top plus lateral plasty

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with Over-the-top plus lateral plasty technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ACL reconstruction with over the top plus lateral plasty technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Non-anatomical ACL reconstruction, the hamstrings' tibial insertion is preserved; a double-bundle hamstring graft is passed intra-articularly, fixed in over the top position on the lateral femoral condyle, and then passed extra-articularly deeply to ileo-tibial band up to the tibia, where it is fixed at the level of Gerdy's tubercle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings

Anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadruple-bundle hamstrings graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ACL reconstruction with over the top plus lateral plasty technique

Non-anatomical ACL reconstruction, the hamstrings' tibial insertion is preserved; a double-bundle hamstring graft is passed intra-articularly, fixed in over the top position on the lateral femoral condyle, and then passed extra-articularly deeply to ileo-tibial band up to the tibia, where it is fixed at the level of Gerdy's tubercle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with single-bundle anatomical technique (patellar tendon, semitendinous and gracile tendons) or "Over-The-Top plus lateral plastic" technique and any associated procedures with at least 15 years of follow up;
2. Patients aged between 15 and 50 at the time of surgery;
3. Patients with isolated ACL tear;
4. Patients with healthy contralateral knee at the time of surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with grade III-IV chondral lesions according to Outerbridge scale at surgery;
2. Patients no longer available;
3. Women of childbearing age who cannot exclude pregnancy;
4. Patients unable to give informed consent or patients unwilling to sign informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefano Zaffagnini, MD Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28205075 (View on PubMed)

Getgood A, Hewison C, Bryant D, Litchfield R, Heard M, Buchko G, Hiemstra LA, Willits KR, Firth A, MacDonald P; Stability Study Group. No Difference in Functional Outcomes When Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Added to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Active Patients: The Stability Study. Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1690-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32147485 (View on PubMed)

Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Raggi F, Signorelli C, Urrizola F, Spinnato P, Rimondi E, Marcacci M. Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;45(14):3233-3242. doi: 10.1177/0363546517723013. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28922015 (View on PubMed)

Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, Zhu B, Chen J, Chen H, Yang F, Chen Y, Lai Q, Liu X. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1459-3. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24748500 (View on PubMed)

Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30790526 (View on PubMed)

Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2279-2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32387652 (View on PubMed)

Curado J, Hulet C, Hardy P, Jenny JY, Rousseau R, Lucet A, Steltzlen C, Morin V, Grimaud O, Bouguennec N, Pujol N, Sonnery-Cottet B, Graveleau N; French Society for Orthopaedic, Trauma Surgery (Societe francaise de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, SoFCOT). Very long-term osteoarthritis rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 182 cases with 22-year' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.034. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32019734 (View on PubMed)

Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16909301 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Long term ACLR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Substitution of the PCL in TKA With UC or PS Design
NCT04679857 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA