Long Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
NCT ID: NCT05088278
Last Updated: 2023-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-01
2023-07-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Compare Two Techniques for the Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
NCT03746470
Association of ALL and ACL Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction in High-risk Population: a RCT.
NCT03229369
Functional Outcome Comparison of Implant-Free Bone-Patellar Tendon Autograft in Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction
NCT04123834
Combined Intra- and Extra-articular ACL Reconstruction Versus Isolated Intra-articular ACL Reconstruction
NCT06505525
Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture; RecOnsTruction Or Repair?
NCT02310854
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HS
Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings
Anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadruple-bundle hamstrings graft
BPT
Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
Over-the-top plus lateral plasty
Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with Over-the-top plus lateral plasty technique
ACL reconstruction with over the top plus lateral plasty technique
Non-anatomical ACL reconstruction, the hamstrings' tibial insertion is preserved; a double-bundle hamstring graft is passed intra-articularly, fixed in over the top position on the lateral femoral condyle, and then passed extra-articularly deeply to ileo-tibial band up to the tibia, where it is fixed at the level of Gerdy's tubercle.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings
Anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadruple-bundle hamstrings graft
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
ACL reconstruction with over the top plus lateral plasty technique
Non-anatomical ACL reconstruction, the hamstrings' tibial insertion is preserved; a double-bundle hamstring graft is passed intra-articularly, fixed in over the top position on the lateral femoral condyle, and then passed extra-articularly deeply to ileo-tibial band up to the tibia, where it is fixed at the level of Gerdy's tubercle.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients aged between 15 and 50 at the time of surgery;
3. Patients with isolated ACL tear;
4. Patients with healthy contralateral knee at the time of surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients no longer available;
3. Women of childbearing age who cannot exclude pregnancy;
4. Patients unable to give informed consent or patients unwilling to sign informed consent.
30 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefano Zaffagnini, MD Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.
Getgood A, Hewison C, Bryant D, Litchfield R, Heard M, Buchko G, Hiemstra LA, Willits KR, Firth A, MacDonald P; Stability Study Group. No Difference in Functional Outcomes When Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Added to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Active Patients: The Stability Study. Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1690-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Raggi F, Signorelli C, Urrizola F, Spinnato P, Rimondi E, Marcacci M. Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;45(14):3233-3242. doi: 10.1177/0363546517723013. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, Zhu B, Chen J, Chen H, Yang F, Chen Y, Lai Q, Liu X. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1459-3. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2279-2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 7.
Curado J, Hulet C, Hardy P, Jenny JY, Rousseau R, Lucet A, Steltzlen C, Morin V, Grimaud O, Bouguennec N, Pujol N, Sonnery-Cottet B, Graveleau N; French Society for Orthopaedic, Trauma Surgery (Societe francaise de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, SoFCOT). Very long-term osteoarthritis rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 182 cases with 22-year' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.034. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Long term ACLR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.