Comparison of Two ACL Reconstruction Techniques: All-inside Versus Complete Tibial Tunnel Technique

NCT ID: NCT05574946

Last Updated: 2024-12-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

71 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-28

Study Completion Date

2024-11-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study intends to perform an all-inside and complete tibial tunnel ACL reconstruction technique in 80 patients, and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the two surgical procedures through follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial study on ACL reconstruction surgery technique. In this study, 80 patients with ACL rupture were recruited according to the enrollment criteria. The recruited patients were randomly divided into groups. The ratio of the control group is 1:1. In this study, 40 patients with ACL rupture in the experimental group will be treated with all-inside reconstruction technique, and 40 patients with ACL rupture in the control group will be treated with complete tibial tunnel technique. All operations will be performed with 4-strand autologous semitendinosus tendon. All fixations will be performed using an adjustable cortical suspensory system. After reconstruction, all subjects will participate in the collection of clinical function scores including Marx Activity score, IKDC score, and clinical evaluation including physical examination, joint laxity, CT and MRI imaging analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

All-inside technique

Both of the femoral and tibial tunnel will be drilled in a retrograde manner using flip-cutter and femoral and tibial sockets will be created. Graft will be passed from the portal. Adjustable suspensory cortical fixation both on tibial and femoral side will be used.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with four strand semitendinosus graft

Complete tibial tunnel technique

Femoral tunnel will be drilled in an inside-outside manner using standard technique. Then the tibial tunnel will be drilled completely. Graft will be passed from the tibial tunnel. Adjustable suspensory cortical fixation both on the tibial and femoral side will be used.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with four strand semitendinosus graft

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with four strand semitendinosus graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have provided informed written written consent;
* Patients aged between 18 and 45;
* Patients undergoing reconstructive surgical treatment of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
* Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with a 8 mm four-strand semitendinosus autograft

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have not signed informed consent;
* Patients undergoing any additional concomitant ligament repair or reconstruction at the same surgery
* Revision procedures
* Patients unable to lay still in an MRI or CT scanner
* Patients with a torn ACL or previous ACL reconstruction in the contralateral knee.
* Patients who had an excessive tibial slope \>12 degrees
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samsun University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Samsun University

Samsun, Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ahmet E. Okutan

Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bhimani R, Shahriarirad R, Ranjbar K, Erfani A, Ashkani-Esfahani S. Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 23;16(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02872-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34949188 (View on PubMed)

Colombet P, Saffarini M, Bouguennec N. Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at a Minimum of 2 Years Using Adjustable Suspensory Fixation in Both the Femur and Tibia: A Prospective Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Oct 22;6(10):2325967118804128. doi: 10.1177/2325967118804128. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30364847 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AEOALLACL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id