The Stimulation To Induce Mothers Study

NCT ID: NCT05079841

Last Updated: 2025-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

988 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-15

Study Completion Date

2029-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators propose a parallel group randomized clinical trial of intrapartum nipple stimulation versus exogenous oxytocin infusion for nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor near term. The central hypothesis is that intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor increases spontaneous vaginal delivery, improves patient-centered outcomes such as childbirth satisfaction, labor agentry, and pain scores, and reduces adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes in nulliparous women. The investigators will pursue the following specific aims: 1) Assess the effectiveness of intrapartum nipple stimulation on the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women, 2) Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition at time of maternal hospital discharge (Primary Aims); 3) Maximal percent newborn weight loss during the birth hospitalization within 72 hours of life, 4) Determine the effect of intrapartum nipple stimulation on the rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, 5) Determine the impact of intrapartum nipple stimulation on patient-centered outcomes and 6) In a sub-cohort of women who are enrolled in the trial, investigators will measure the change in oxytocin concentration from baseline to time at which patient achieves a regular contraction pattern.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Objectives

1. To determine whether intrapartum nipple stimulation therapy with or without synthetic oxytocin changes the likelihood of achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery compared to receipt of synthetic oxytocin infusion without nipple stimulation to induce labor.
2. Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition at time of maternal hospital discharge

Secondary Objectives (if applicable)

The secondary objectives are as follows:

1. Determine whether intrapartum nipple stimulation therapy with or without synthetic oxytocin changes the likelihood of achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery compared to receipt of synthetic oxytocin infusion without nipple stimulation to induce labor.
2. Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor have differences in other obstetric and maternal outcomes
3. Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation report differences in pain scores during labor, labor agentry and satisfaction scores, postpartum depression scores, and breastfeeding success compared to women who receive only intrapartum exogenous oxytocin infusion.
4. Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor have similar fetal and neonatal outcomes compared to women who receive only intrapartum exogenous oxytocin infusion.
5. Maximal percent newborn weight loss during the birth hospitalization within 72 hours of life
6. At Yale, to measure the change in oxytocin concentration from baseline over the course of labor induction in patients undergoing induction of labor via intrapartum nipple stimulation versus continuous exogenous oxytocin infusion.
7. At Yale, to measure circulating plasma and urine concentrations of proteins, microRNA, and small molecules using unbiased "omics" approaches, comparing patients undergoing induction of labor via intrapartum nipple stimulation versus continuous exogenous oxytocin infusion, un-ripened/unlabored control patients, and patients in spontaneous labor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oxytocin Labor Pain Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn Physiologic Effects of Drugs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intrapartum nipple stimulation

Participants randomized to the intrapartum nipple stimulation will use electric breast pump or stimulate by hand (intervention) to induce labor.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electric breast pump

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants randomized to the intrapartum nipple stimulation will use electric breast pump or nipple stimulate by hand (if preferred) (intervention) to induce labor for at least 2 hours

Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion

Participants randomized to the standard care arm will use exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion to induce labor.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation.

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants randomized to the standard care arm will use exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion to induce labor as current standard of care

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electric breast pump

Participants randomized to the intrapartum nipple stimulation will use electric breast pump or nipple stimulate by hand (if preferred) (intervention) to induce labor for at least 2 hours

Intervention Type DEVICE

Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation.

Participants randomized to the standard care arm will use exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion to induce labor as current standard of care

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pitocin intravenous infusion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nulliparous
* Gestational age 36 0/7 weeks and greater at enrollment
* Singleton gestation
* Planned to undergo initiation of exogenous oxytocin infusion by their maternity care provider
* Spontaneous rupture of membranes or if membranes intact, modified Bishop score ≥5 and cervix dilated \<6 cm within one hour of enrollment
* Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to understand English or Spanish
* Prior use of exogenous oxytocin or attempt at nipple stimulation during the current pregnancy
* Presence of tachysystole (defined as more than 5 contractions in 10 minutes averaged over 30 minutes), recurrent variable or late fetal decelerations, and bradycardia in the prior 30 minutes before enrollment
* Non-vertex presenting fetus at time of enrollment
* Planned for cesarean delivery or contraindication to labor by institutional policy (e.g., placenta previa, vasa previa, active genital herpes infection, previous transmural myomectomy)
* Multi-fetal gestation (e.g., twins, triplets, and higher-order multiples)
* Intrauterine fetal death
* Major fetal anomaly suspected prenatally (defined as a fetal anomaly with anticipated neonatal intensive care unit admission)
* Suspected alloimmunization (given the increased likelihood for anticipated neonatal intensive care unit admission)
* Known severe fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight \<3rd percentile) or abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies (given the increased likelihood for anticipated neonatal intensive care unit admission)
* HIV infection (nipple stimulation is not encouraged given the recommendation for these mothers not to breastfeed)
* Participation in another interventional study that influences management of labor and delivery or perinatal morbidity or mortality
* History of mastectomy or other contraindication to use of electronic breast pump
* Known allergic reactions to components of the electronic breast pump or to synthetic oxytocin intravenous solution
* Significantly impaired consciousness or executive function (e.g., intubated or sedated)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Molly McAdow, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Bethany Stetson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Moeun Son, MD, MSCI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Moeun Son, MD, MSCI

Role: CONTACT

(212) 746-2106

Molly McAdow, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tortal D, Shabanova V, Taylor S, Xu X, McAdow M, Stetson B, McCollum S, Sanchez E, Adjakple A, Leventhal J, Son M. Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 29;13:e63463. doi: 10.2196/63463.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39207839 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01HD111633-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

231888-1

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2000031338

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.