Continuous Versus Intermittent Oxytocin Infusion for Induction of Labor

NCT ID: NCT04017247

Last Updated: 2023-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will compare 2 treatment modalities. One group will receive the routine protocol of intermittent pitocin induction for 6 hours and the second group will receive continous pitocin infusion for 16 hours.

The primary aim is to observe which protocol leads to the fastest delivery and evaluate the time in each group from induction to delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After singing an informed consent, and prior to IOL initiation, study participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either intermittent or continuous Oxytocin infusion. Both groups received the same primary infusion dose of Oxytocin 1.0 with an incremental increase of 2.5 every 30 minutes until 20, titered to a target of 3-5 contractions in a 10 minute period. During Oxytocin infusion, fetal heart rate was continuously monitored. Artificial ROM was performed according to the accepted indications, local protocol and by the staff physician discretion who was in charge on the labor ward at that time, regardless of oxytocin initiation time. In the intermittent Oxytocin infusion group, Oxytocin was discontinued after 8 h if the patient did not go into active labor during by that time, and renewed 4 h later. In the continuous infusion group, patients received a continuous Oxytocin infusion for 16 h. If they did not go into active labor within this frame time, Oxytocin was discontinued for 4 hours and then resumed. In addition, during Oxytocin infusion, sodium levels were monitored every 8 h.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Induced; Birth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intermittent treatment

Infusion of oxytocin for 6 hours at a time until patient delivers.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxytocin

Intervention Type DRUG

Intermittent oxytocin Infusion

Continous treatment

Infusion of oxytocin continuously from patient admission for 16 hours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxytocin

Intervention Type DRUG

Continous oxytocin Infusion for 16 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oxytocin

Intermittent oxytocin Infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxytocin

Continous oxytocin Infusion for 16 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Women with a singleton pregnancy that are admitted for induction or augmentation of labor.
2. Women at gestational age 370/7 or more.
3. Vertex presentation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age under 18 or over 45.
2. High order gestation.
3. Women with contraindication for vaginal delivery.
4. Active labor.
5. Women with a uterine scar.
6. Multiparity(\> 5 deliveries).
7. Documented fetal anomalies.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rambam Health Care Campus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ROY LAUTERBACH MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roy Lauterbach, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigator

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rambam health care campus

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bachar G, Abu-Rass H, Farago N, Justman N, Buchnik G, Chen YS, David CB, Goldfarb N, Khatib N, Ginsberg Y, Zipori Y, Weiner Z, Vitner D. Continuous vs intermittent induction of labor with oxytocin in nulliparous patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Dec;5(12):101176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101176. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37813304 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0308-19-RMB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Management of the Third Stage of Labor
NCT02319707 UNKNOWN PHASE3
The Stimulation To Induce Mothers Study
NCT05079841 RECRUITING PHASE4
Up-Down Oxytocin Infusion
NCT00785395 COMPLETED PHASE4