Postpartum Quality of Recovery & Maternal Satisfaction After C/S
NCT ID: NCT05077891
Last Updated: 2025-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-08-01
2024-06-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impact of Fasting Duration on Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Section
NCT06701929
Quality of Recovery After Unplanned and Planned Cesarean Deliveries - an Application of ObsQoR-10
NCT04907292
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Obstetric Comorbidity Index and Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score
NCT05704179
Quality of Postpartum Cesarean Recovery Score Validity Reliability
NCT05373563
Longitudinal Study Evaluating Recovery After Scheduled Cesarean Delivery
NCT04462107
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Older than 19 years of age
* Received a cesarean delivery
* Received a cesarean delivery 24-48 hours prior to time of recruitment
Exclusion Criteria
* Below the age of 19 years
* Did not receive a cesarean delivery
* Received a cesarean delivery more than 48hrs after time of recruitment
19 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anthony Chau
Director of Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anton Chau, MD MMSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BC Women's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E, Sathasivam C, Chazapis M, Dick J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
Bowyer A, Jakobsson J, Ljungqvist O, Royse C. A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery. Anaesthesia. 2014 Nov;69(11):1266-78. doi: 10.1111/anae.12730. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Heidegger T, Saal D, Nubling M. Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia - Part 1: satisfaction as part of outcome - and what satisfies patients. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1165-72. doi: 10.1111/anae.12347. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MP, Giannaris S, Dick JR, Moonesinghe SR. Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013 Aug;119(2):452-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976014.
Camann W. Pain, Pain Relief, Satisfaction and Excellence in Obstetric Anesthesia: A Surprisingly Complex Relationship. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):383-385. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001676. No abstract available.
Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):137-44.
Linda D. Results of the National Maternity Experience Survey 2020 2020 [Available from: https://yourexperience.ie/maternity/national-results/.
Porter M, van Teijlingen E, Chi Ying Yip L, Bhattacharya S. Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey. Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):148-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00161.x.
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33.
Cook K, Loomis C. The Impact of Choice and Control on Women's Childbirth Experiences. J Perinat Educ. 2012 Summer;21(3):158-68. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.3.158.
Brooks H, Sullivan WJ. The importance of patient autonomy at birth. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2002 Jul;11(3):196-203. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.2002.0958.
Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lo J. The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999 Jul;8(3):165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(99)80132-0.
Berning V, Laupheimer M, Nubling M, Heidegger T. Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2017 Sep;72(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1111/anae.13906. Epub 2017 May 16.
Myles PS, Reeves MD, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Measurement of quality of recovery in 5672 patients after anaesthesia and surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000 Jun;28(3):276-80. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0002800304.
Ciechanowicz S, Howle R, Heppolette C, Nakhjavani B, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H21-01082
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.