Validation of an Obstetric QoR Score and to Establish Its MCID.

NCT ID: NCT03711552

Last Updated: 2019-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-31

Study Completion Date

2019-07-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The ObsQoR-11 is an 11-item survey that was recently developed to evaluate recovery after caesarean section. This has been shown to be valid, feasible, reliable and responsive to changes in health status. The aim of this study to validate the ObsQoR-11 score in an Irish obstetric hospital. The collection of supplemental data will allow its comparison to the QoR-15 score and calculation of the MCID.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators aim to perform a prospective observational study of term parturients undergoing caesarean section. Patients undergoing elective and emergency caesarean section will be eligible for inclusion. Patients will be invited to fill out the survey before their caesarean section if feasible and then again at 24 and 48 hours. A subset of patients will be asked to repeat the second survey 30-60 minutes later to assess test-retest reliability. The patient demographics will be recorded at the initial survey. The time taken to fill out the 11-item ObsQoR-11 will be recorded. The QoR-15 score will also be completed at the same time and will allow comparison of the scores. The patient's Global health score will be assessed on a 0-100 scale from worst imaginable health state to best imaginable health state. At 24 and 48 hours patients will be asked to rate their overall recovery from surgery yesterday on a 15-point scale ranging from -7 to +7. This will facilitate an anchor-based determination of the MCID.

The validation of the ObsQoR-11 score will follow as per the Consensus based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) initiative. The assessment tool will be evaluated under the domains of validity, reliability, responsiveness and feasibility. The QoR-15 score will be similarly assessed to allow a comparison.

Validity will be assessed using two separate methods:

1. Convergent and discriminant validity - Comparison of the ObsQoR-11 score to 100mm Global health score.
2. Content validity - ObsQoR-11 will be assessed for correlation with patient age and length of hospital stay.

Reliability as a measure of consistency will be assessed based on the following methods:

1. Internal consistency - the averaged correlation between each of the items within theObsQoR-11.
2. Split half reliability - assessed by evaluating the correlation between random split segments.
3. Test-retest reliability - a subset of patients will be reassessed at 30-60 minutes and the correlation between scores assessed.
4. Floor and ceiling effects - this will be evaluated by whether \<15% of patients achieved the highest (110/110) or lowest (0/110) possible scores.

Responsiveness is a measure of the ability to detect a clinically important change.

1. Cohen effect size - the mean change in scores from before surgery to 24 hours after surgery divided by the standard deviation at baseline.
2. Standardised response mean - the change in the scores before surgery to 24 hours after surgery divided by the standard deviation of the change in scores.
3. Mean ObsQoR-11 scores - mean scores compared before surgery to 24 hours after surgery.

Feasibility

1. Assessment of recruitment rate.
2. Successful recruitment rate.
3. Time taken to complete the ObsQoR-11.

The MCID will be determined based on an anchor-based method. The change in the mean score of the ObsQoR-11 score will be compared to the patient's own assessment of her change in health status using a Likert scale. We opted to follow a similar statistical method from an influential paper for estimation of the MCID. This will be based on calculation of the 0.3 SD (standard deviation), SEM (standard error of the mean) and the 5% range.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality of Recovery Caesarean Section

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Quality of recovery

All enrolled patients will be asked to complete the ObsQoR-11 and QoR-15 questionnaires pre-surgery if feasible and at 24 and 48 hours post-surgery.

ObsQoR-11

Intervention Type OTHER

Quality of recovery questionnaire

QoR-15

Intervention Type OTHER

Quality of recovery questionnaire

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ObsQoR-11

Quality of recovery questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

QoR-15

Quality of recovery questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Caesarean section.
* Age \>18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to read or understand English.
* Patient refusal.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ruairi Irwin

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Terry Tan

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Head of Department of Anaesthesia CWIUH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CWIUH-QoR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.