Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
140 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-08-09
2023-03-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inflammation in Obese Parturients: Surgical Outcomes After Elective Caesarean Section
NCT01836315
Anesthetic and Obstetric Outcomes in Morbidly Obese Pregnancy and Cesarean Delivery
NCT03590951
Quality of Recovery After Unplanned and Planned Cesarean Deliveries - an Application of ObsQoR-10
NCT04907292
Incidence of Complications Associated With Anesthesia in Obesity Parturient Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT04657692
Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Morbidly Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery
NCT03269968
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Obesity is a pro-inflammatory state which leads to chronic low grade inflammation. It has been well studied that this very inflammation and oxidative stress is responsible for cardiovascular pathologies seen in these patients. As a result, the post-operative period is characterized by a phase of prolonged systemic inflammatory response, which makes obesity an independent risk factor for severe acute pain. As a matter of fact, an extreme rise in IL-6 in patients with obesity has been demonstrated post-operatively.
In addition, adipose tissue acts as an endocrine organ by releasing a number of other pro-inflammatory proteins. Cytokines are known to promote various metabolic, hemodynamic and immunologic changes post-surgery, and in the setting of exaggerated inflammatory response can lead to increased pain and hemodynamic instability.
Very few studies have evaluated the recovery experience of patients with obesity in the acute postoperative period. Patients with obesity undergoing general abdominal surgery have been shown to have worse surgical outcomes, increased complication rates, and increased analgesic requirements.7 However, in spine surgery, there have been conflicting evidence supporting a difference in pain scores in patients with obesity. Despite there being no clear guidelines on post-operative pain control between these two groups, providers reported prescribing less opioid analgesics post-operatively to patients with obesity when compared to patients not suffering from this condition.
The Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR) was initially developed and validated as a measure of patient reported outcome after caesarean delivery. It started as an 11-item questionnaire (ObsQoR-11), which was further simplified to 10-items (ObsQoR-10) following patient feedback where moderate and severe pain questions were combined into a single item. This tool measures pain, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, shivering, comfort, mobility, ability to hold and feed the baby, personal hygiene maintenance, and feeling in control, to provide a global inpatient postpartum quality of recovery score out of 100. A systematic review assessing measurement properties of available patient-reported outcome measures using COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) methodology, recommended ObsQoR as the best available instrument to measure functional recovery following caesarean delivery.
No prospective studies have been conducted to specifically evaluate the quality of recovery after caesarean delivery for women with morbid obesity when compared to non-obese parturients. In addition, while there is biological plausibility to infer worse pain scores in parturients with obesity, the magnitude of this difference is unknown and information guiding adjustments in pain management are lacking.
The investigators hypothesize that parturients with Class 3 obesity experience impaired quality of recovery scores after elective cesarean delivery as measured by the ObsQoR-10 when compared to non-obese parturients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Parturients with Normal Weight
Parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery with a BMI \<30 (control group)
No interventions assigned to this group
Parturients with Morbid Obesity
Parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery with a BMI \>40 (Study Group)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Term pregnancy (\> 37 weeks gestational age)
* Elective caesarean delivery
* BMI \>40 (Study Group) or BMI \<30 (Control Group)
* ASA\<=3
Exclusion Criteria
* History of opioid use during pregnancy.
* History of substance abuse disorder during pregnancy.
* Contraindication to neuraxial opioids, acetaminophen and/or NSAIDs
* Language barrier
* Allergy to Opioids or NSAIDS
* Intra-operative conversion to general anesthesia
* Maternal Admission to ICU.
* Neonatal admission to NICU.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ilana Sebbag, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Western University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vincent HK, Taylor AG. Biomarkers and potential mechanisms of obesity-induced oxidant stress in humans. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Mar;30(3):400-18. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803177.
Musaad S, Haynes EN. Biomarkers of obesity and subsequent cardiovascular events. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:98-114. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm005. Epub 2007 May 10.
Mei W, Seeling M, Franck M, Radtke F, Brantner B, Wernecke KD, Spies C. Independent risk factors for postoperative pain in need of intervention early after awakening from general anaesthesia. Eur J Pain. 2010 Feb;14(2):149.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 May 6.
Gletsu N, Lin E, Zhu JL, Khaitan L, Ramshaw BJ, Farmer PK, Ziegler TR, Papanicolaou DA, Smith CD. Increased plasma interleukin 6 concentrations and exaggerated adipose tissue interleukin 6 content in severely obese patients after operative trauma. Surgery. 2006 Jul;140(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.01.018.
Galic S, Oakhill JS, Steinberg GR. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010 Mar 25;316(2):129-39. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
Kim MG, Yook JH, Kim KC, Kim TH, Kim HS, Kim BS, Kim BS. Influence of obesity on early surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):151-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318219a57d.
Elsamadicy AA, Camara-Quintana J, Kundishora AJ, Lee M, Freedman IG, Long A, Qureshi T, Laurans M, Tomak P, Karikari IO. Reduced Impact of Obesity on Short-Term Surgical Outcomes, Patient-Reported Pain Scores, and 30-Day Readmission Rates After Complex Spinal Fusion (>/=7 Levels) for Adult Deformity Correction. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e108-e113. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.165. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Sorimachi Y, Neva MH, Vihtonen K, Kyrola K, Iizuka H, Takagishi K, Hakkinen A. Effect of Obesity and Being Overweight on Disability and Pain After Lumbar Fusion: An Analysis of 805 Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(9):772-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001356.
Kruger MT, Naseri Y, Hohenhaus M, Hubbe U, Scholz C, Klingler JH. Impact of morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2) on complication rate and outcome following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;178:82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Bui AH, Feldman DL, Brodman ML, Shamamian P, Kaleya RN, Rosenblatt MA, D'Angelo D, Somerville D, Mudiraj S, Kischak P, Leitman IM. Provider preferences for postoperative analgesia in obese and non-obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 May 17;11:9. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0138-x. eCollection 2018.
Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E, Sathasivam C, Chazapis M, Dick J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
Ciechanowicz S, Howle R, Heppolette C, Nakhjavani B, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
Sultan P, Kormendy F, Nishimura S, Carvalho B, Guo N, Papageorgiou C. Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109781. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Sharawi N, Klima L, Shah R, Blake L, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures of functional recovery following caesarean section: a systematic review using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Anaesthesia. 2019 Nov;74(11):1439-1455. doi: 10.1111/anae.14807. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Sultan P, Carvalho B. Postpartum recovery: what does it take to get back to a baseline? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):86-93. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000684.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
WHO. Fact Sheet: Obesity and overweight. 2006.
17\. Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2012. Power calculator for continuous outcome superiority trial
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11292
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.