Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-10-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Clinical evaluation In this research project the investigators will recruit 20 patients with upper limb spasticity (regardless of the underlying disease responsible for the spasticity), 20 patients with Parkinson's disease characterized by stiffness of the upper limbs and 20 healthy control subjects. Patients will be recruited from the IRCCS Neuromed Institute, Pozzilli (IS). Participants will give their written informed consent to the study, which will be approved by the institutional ethics committee of the IRCCS Neuromed Institute, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants will be right-handed according to the Edinburgh handedness inventory (EDI) (Oldfield, 1971). Parkinson's disease will be diagnosed in accordance with the updated diagnostic criteria of the MDS (Postuma, RB et al. Validation of the MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 33, 1601 -1608 (2018)., Nd). Clinical signs and symptoms of parkinsonian patients will be evaluated using the Hoehn \& Yahr scale (H\&Y), UPDRS part III (Patrick et al., 2001). The diagnosis of spasticity will be made through the neurological clinical evaluation of the patients and on the basis of the specific clinical history of the various pathologies underlying the spasticity itself (e.g. multiple sclerosis, stroke, spinal injuries). Spasticity will be assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale "(MAS) (Harb and Kishner, 2021), the Modified Tardieu scale (MTS) (Patrick and Ada, 2006). Cognitive functions and mood, in both pathological conditions, will be evaluated using the clinical Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) scale (Folstein et al., 1975) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM\_D) ( Hamilton, 1967). No participant must report pain problems and / or functional limitations affecting the upper limbs.
Exclusion criteria: - insufficient degree of passive wrist movement (\<30 ° in flexion and \<40 ° in extension) - tension at rest during NeuroFlexor recordings - hand pathologies (neurological or rheumatological) - upper limb fractures in the previous six months - presence of peacemakers or other stimulators - pregnancy.
All patients, and the group of healthy control subjects will have comparable anthropometric and demographic characteristics.
Experimental paradigm Participants will be seated comfortably, with the shoulder at 45 ° of abduction, the elbow at 90 ° in flexion, the forearm in pronation and the dominant hand placed on the platform of the Neuroflexor device. Participants will be instructed to relax during the test session, which will consist of the passive extension of the wrist at 7 speeds, one slow (5 ° / s) and 6 rapid (50 ° / s, 100 ° / s, 150 ° / s, 200 ° / s, 236 ° / s, 280 ° / s). The total range of wrist movement will be 50 °, starting from an initial angle of 20 ° in palmar flexion up to 30 ° in extension. Before the start of the experiment, participants will do practical tests in order to become familiar with the device. Two slow and five rapid movements will be made for each speed. The different angular velocities of wrist mobilization will be randomized. Slow movements will be performed before fast movements with an interval of 10 seconds between each test. For each participant, a NC, EC and VC value in Newton will be calculated by a dedicated software. The resistance profiles will also be obtained when the device was running idle (without hand) to allow the biomechanical model to isolate the forces originating from the hand from the intrinsic forces of the device. For each movement, the corresponding surface EMG trace will have been recorded, by placing the electrodes on the skin overlying the belly of the FRC and ERC muscles. An accelerometer, fixed on the back of the hand of the limb to be examined, will be used to synchronize the electromyograph with the NeuroFlexor. The EMG activity recorded by means of surface electrodes with belly-tendon type mounting, will be amplified using the Digitimer, will then be digitized at 5 kHz using the CED, and finally it will be stored on a computer dedicated to offline analysis. EMG recordings will be made at 6 speeds, 50°/ s, 100°/ s, 150°/ s, 200 °/s, 236 °/s, 280 °/s. For each trace the following parameters will be analyzed: latency, peak-to-peak amplitude and area of the EMG response.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stroke and Assessment of Muscle Tone
NCT03814460
Myotonia and Muscle Stiffness in NMD
NCT04411732
Muscle Force Assessment in the Intensive Care Unit and in Primary Myopathies
NCT00735384
Characterization and Longitudinal Monitoring of Muscular Phenotype in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care for Sepsis
NCT07074028
Effectiveness of Deep Dry Needling on Muscle Tone in Healthy Subjects
NCT02575586
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy Subjects
Robot-assisted examination
evaluation of muscle tone with Robot-assisted perturbation
Patients with rigidity
Robot-assisted examination
evaluation of muscle tone with Robot-assisted perturbation
Patients with spasticity
Robot-assisted examination
evaluation of muscle tone with Robot-assisted perturbation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robot-assisted examination
evaluation of muscle tone with Robot-assisted perturbation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* post-stroke spasticity
Exclusion Criteria
* rheumatoid arthritis
* cognitive impairment (MMSE \<24)
* depression and other mood disorders (HAMD\> 7)
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Neuromed IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonio Suppa
MD, PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Irccs Neuromed
Pozzilli, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NEUR_02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.