Heat Shock Therapy to Improve Mitochondrial Function in Neuropathy

NCT ID: NCT05070741

Last Updated: 2025-01-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-27

Study Completion Date

2022-07-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sensory dysfunction as a result of peripheral nerve damage is a significant problem that leads to reduced quality of life for patients. The prevalence of sensory dysfunction in peripheral neuropathy associates with epidemic increases in prediabetes and diabetes, but also is relevant to chemotherapy treatments and genetic disorders. Clinical approaches to treat peripheral neuropathy and to stimulate axon growth in settings of peripheral axon loss are limited. Although new drugs will hopefully be forthcoming, the most promising approaches likely involve behavioral and lifestyle interventions. Mitochondrial dysfunction is emerging as a key cellular contribution to peripheral axon health and peripheral neuropathy. Mitochondrial deficiencies contribute to neuropathy and include impaired mitochondrial problems with trafficking, mitophagy, fission, and biogenesis. All of these are thought to lead to a bioenergetic crisis, ending in distal axonal degeneration, sensory dysfunction and pain. Heat shock proteins play a critically important role in cellular homeostasis and increasing heat shock protein functions within cells leads to a range of positive improvements, particularly in mitochondria. In addition, new evidence suggests that increasing heat shock protein responses in peripheral nerves has powerful, positive impacts on sensory function and neuropathy.

Our interdisciplinary team will investigate the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in peripheral neuropathy and translate these approaches to improve treatment for patients with peripheral neuropathy. The investigators hypothesize that novel heat treatment interventions that improve mitochondrial function will improve metabolic symptoms and peripheral nerve mitochondria, leading to improvements in sensory function, via heat shock protein induction. The investigators will employ immersion heat treatment to elevate heat shock protein responses that induce positive changes in peripheral nerve mitochondria. One aspect is to confirm the efficacy, safety, and potential for heat treatment to improve sensory dysfunction in human patients with prediabetes. The goal of this proposal is 1) to test the breadth of heat treatment on various forms of neuropathy, 2) identify mechanisms in which heat treatment improves mitochondrial function, and 3) test the efficacy, safety, and potential for heat treatment to improve sensory dysfunction in human patients with prediabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PreDiabetes Neuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This prospective, observational cohort pilot study will recruit 20 patients with prediabetes with or without peripheral neuropathy (painful and non-painful) to participate in a 4-week heat therapy intervention. After screening, informed consent, and enrollment into the study, subjects will undergo a pre-intervention evaluation that will assess metabolic biomarkers and heat shock protein levels (blood), peripheral neuropathy, and epidermal evaluation (skin biopsy). After the skin biopsy has the appropriate time to heal (approximately 7-14 days), the subjects will undergo 45-minute heat treatments in 40°C water, three times weekly, for 4 weeks. After completion of heat treatments, subjects will undergo a repeated post-intervention evaluation and skin biopsy. Statistical approaches will compare pre- and post-heat therapy measures.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Heat Therapy Treatment

This study will recruit subjects to participate in heat therapy treatment at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC). After pre-screening, informed consent, and enrollment, all subjects will have baseline laboratory assessments as well as an examination for neuropathy and a lower distal leg biopsy (3mm). Subjects will complete 12 heat therapy treatments over the course of 4 weeks. Within 24-48 hours after the last heat therapy experience, post-treatment laboratory assessments as well as an examination for neuropathy and a lower distal leg biopsy (3mm) will be performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Heat Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will undergo 12 hot water immersions of 40.5 degrees Celsius for approximately 45 minutes per session over 4 weeks. Subjects will be immersed up to the shoulder in a 40°C hot tub until rectal temperature (Tre) increases by 1°C (\~20 minutes). Subjects will then remain in the water bath submerged to waist level to maintain Tre between 38.5 and 39.0°C for another 30 minutes (approx. total time submerged \~50 minutes). Following hot water immersion, subjects will be monitored for another 10 min, or until Tre falls below 38.5°C. Core temperature will be monitored using either 1) a rectal probe with sterile disposable sheaths or 2) a sterile disposable rectal thermistor probe (401 A/C, Advanced Industrial Systems, Inc., Harrods Creek, KY) to be inserted \~1 inch past the anal sphincter (inserted by participant). Heart rate and blood pressure will be monitored throughout the treatment. Subjects will be continually monitored and removed from the hot bath if Tre exceeds 39.5°C.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Heat Therapy

Subjects will undergo 12 hot water immersions of 40.5 degrees Celsius for approximately 45 minutes per session over 4 weeks. Subjects will be immersed up to the shoulder in a 40°C hot tub until rectal temperature (Tre) increases by 1°C (\~20 minutes). Subjects will then remain in the water bath submerged to waist level to maintain Tre between 38.5 and 39.0°C for another 30 minutes (approx. total time submerged \~50 minutes). Following hot water immersion, subjects will be monitored for another 10 min, or until Tre falls below 38.5°C. Core temperature will be monitored using either 1) a rectal probe with sterile disposable sheaths or 2) a sterile disposable rectal thermistor probe (401 A/C, Advanced Industrial Systems, Inc., Harrods Creek, KY) to be inserted \~1 inch past the anal sphincter (inserted by participant). Heart rate and blood pressure will be monitored throughout the treatment. Subjects will be continually monitored and removed from the hot bath if Tre exceeds 39.5°C.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. both males and females,
2. ages 45-75,
3. have suspected or diagnosed prediabetes with or without neuropathy (to be confirmed at pre-intervention evaluation).

Exclusion Criteria

1. skin conditions, circulatory insufficiency, or open wounds in the leg that would interfere with healing from a biopsy;
2. stroke or other significant nervous system pathology;
3. lidocaine allergy;
4. anticipated difficulty with blood clotting due to disorder or use of a blood thinner such as Coumadin, Xarelto, or Eliquis;
5. use of any medication used to treat abnormal blood glucose such as Metformin;
6. body weight \> 350 lbs.;
7. history of anemia or vitamin b12 deficiency;
8. clinical anemia (hematocrit \<32 for women, \<36 for men);
9. abnormal SPEP result;
10. history of cancer or chemotherapy treatment;
11. current or recent use (within the last 6 months) of artificial fingernails / nail enhancements that would interfere with quantitative sensory testing;
12. no special classes of subjects such as fetuses, neonates, pregnant women, prisoners, institutionalized individuals, non-English speaking individuals, or other who may be considered vulnerable populations will be included in this study.

Withdrawal/Termination criteria: Prediabetes will be determined using the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Management Guidelines. The subject will meet the criteria for a diagnosis of pre-diabetes if the subject has one or more positive test(s) for either A1c (5.7-6.4%), fasting glucose (100-125 mg/dl), or 2-hr oral glucose tolerance test (140-199 mg/dl). If at pre-intervention evaluation, the subject does not meet the criteria for prediabetes (lower than the above-mentioned range), meets the ADA criteria for diabetes (higher than the above-mentioned range), the subject will be considered a screen fail and will not progress to skin biopsy or intervention.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Kansas Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paige Geiger, PhD

Professor of Molecular & Integrative Physiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paige Geiger, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kansas Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00143811

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.