Wheelchair Backs That Support the Spinal Curves

NCT ID: NCT05068648

Last Updated: 2025-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall objective of this fully powered clinical trial is to investigate if using a solid backrest on a manual wheelchair (MWC) will improve postural alignment, function and wheelchair mobility, as compared with an upholstery backrest, and to explore the impact of overall back height, contour, and seat gap when using a solid backrest in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A properly fit wheelchair and seating system can have a profound impact on the daily life of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). A backrest that supports the natural spinal curves is thought to enhance posture, functional mobility, and comfort for manual wheelchair (MWC) users. In fact, therapists routinely prescribe after-market posture-backs based on clinical reasoning. However, there is little research comparing the efficacy of an after-market posture-back to the standard upholstery back, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify these to group insurance payers.

Based on this, investigators performed a pilot study to investigate whether there were postural and/or functional differences between using a standard upholstery WC back and an after-market solid posture-back. The results of that study have been presented at the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) annual conference in November 2019 and the Combined Sections Meeting (CSM) of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) in February 2020, and were also published in the Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine in 2020.

Although the results of that study demonstrated clinical relevance and statistical trends for improvements in postural alignment and functional outcomes when using a solid back, there was not enough power to establish statistical significance. It also did not evaluate the effect of backrest height and position or depth of contour in order to inform clinical practice. The overall objective of this fully powered clinical trial is to further investigate if using a solid backrest on MWC will improve postural alignment, function and wheelchair mobility, as compared with an upholstery backrest; and to explore the impact of overall back height, seat gap, and contour when using a solid backrest.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MWC Configuration 1

standard upholstery back that promotes posterior pelvic tilt set at or below cushion level and 1" above inferior angle

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration

Intervention Type OTHER

Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment

MWC Configuration 2

active contour back positioned with seat gap and with free scapulae

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration

Intervention Type OTHER

Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment

MWC Configuration 3

active contour back positioned with seat gap and with blocked scapulae

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration

Intervention Type OTHER

Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment

MWC Configuration 4

deep contour back positioned with seat gap and with free scapulae

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration

Intervention Type OTHER

Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment

MWC Configuration 5

deep contour back positioned without seat gap and with free scapulae

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration

Intervention Type OTHER

Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration

Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Full time manual wheelchair users
* Motor complete SCI from C6-T4
* Age 18-70 at time of testing
* Time since injury \> 3 month at time of testing

Exclusion Criteria

* Weight \>250 pounds
* Current pressure ulcer at time of testing
* Significant shoulder pain that precludes independent mobility at time of testing
* Insufficient range of motion to achieve neutral pelvis and spine at time of testing
* Orthopedic restrictions requiring a brace that would impact functional outcome measures
* Shoulder flexion range of motion \<120 degrees at time of testing
* PSIS-to-Inferior Angle of scapula measurement less than 8 inches or greater than 16 inches
* Cognitive deficits or visual impairment that would impair ability to give informed consent or to follow simple instructions during testing
* Children, pregnant women and prisoners will not participate in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Craig Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Candace Tefertiller

Executive Director of Research and Evaluation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Craig Hospital

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation

West Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB#1788302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Arm and Leg Cycling for Accelerated Recovery From SCI
NCT05619146 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
C-Brace II Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03930056 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Wheelchair Indoors Curling With SCI patients_RCT
NCT02550834 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Effects of In-Wheel Suspension
NCT04467749 COMPLETED NA