Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2025-01-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Supportive Wheelchair Back Compared to Fabric Back
NCT03962582
The Effect of Powered-Knee Exoskeleton Assist on Stair Climbing in Acute CVA
NCT03264235
Resilience in Persons Following Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04544761
Mobile Manual Standing Wheelchair for SCI
NCT04668326
EKSO Trial: Powered Exoskeleton for Ambulation in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
NCT01701388
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Based on this, investigators performed a pilot study to investigate whether there were postural and/or functional differences between using a standard upholstery WC back and an after-market solid posture-back. The results of that study have been presented at the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) annual conference in November 2019 and the Combined Sections Meeting (CSM) of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) in February 2020, and were also published in the Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine in 2020.
Although the results of that study demonstrated clinical relevance and statistical trends for improvements in postural alignment and functional outcomes when using a solid back, there was not enough power to establish statistical significance. It also did not evaluate the effect of backrest height and position or depth of contour in order to inform clinical practice. The overall objective of this fully powered clinical trial is to further investigate if using a solid backrest on MWC will improve postural alignment, function and wheelchair mobility, as compared with an upholstery backrest; and to explore the impact of overall back height, seat gap, and contour when using a solid backrest.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MWC Configuration 1
standard upholstery back that promotes posterior pelvic tilt set at or below cushion level and 1" above inferior angle
Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration
Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment
MWC Configuration 2
active contour back positioned with seat gap and with free scapulae
Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration
Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment
MWC Configuration 3
active contour back positioned with seat gap and with blocked scapulae
Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration
Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment
MWC Configuration 4
deep contour back positioned with seat gap and with free scapulae
Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration
Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment
MWC Configuration 5
deep contour back positioned without seat gap and with free scapulae
Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration
Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Manual Wheelchair (MWC) backrest configuration
Wheelchair backrest fitting, postural and functional assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Motor complete SCI from C6-T4
* Age 18-70 at time of testing
* Time since injury \> 3 month at time of testing
Exclusion Criteria
* Current pressure ulcer at time of testing
* Significant shoulder pain that precludes independent mobility at time of testing
* Insufficient range of motion to achieve neutral pelvis and spine at time of testing
* Orthopedic restrictions requiring a brace that would impact functional outcome measures
* Shoulder flexion range of motion \<120 degrees at time of testing
* PSIS-to-Inferior Angle of scapula measurement less than 8 inches or greater than 16 inches
* Cognitive deficits or visual impairment that would impair ability to give informed consent or to follow simple instructions during testing
* Children, pregnant women and prisoners will not participate in this study
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
INDUSTRY
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
OTHER
Craig Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Candace Tefertiller
Executive Director of Research and Evaluation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Craig Hospital
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB#1788302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.