Patient's Choice in the Reduction of Their Treatment in Women Over 65 Year With Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05058196
Last Updated: 2024-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
104 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-01
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In some cases, for elderly patients older than 65 years with other associated pathologies, therapeutic de-escalation might be proposed in order to reduce the radiation doses received. Two options can be considered:
* Intraoperative radiotherapy: radiation is delivered in a single dose directly to the tumor bed during the surgery.
* Radiotherapy omission
These three treatment options (whole-breast radiation therapy, Intraoperative radiotherapy or -Radiotherapy omission) have advantages and disadvantages. Intraoperative radiotherapy allows a targeted treatment and avoids several weeks of daily radiation. Radiotherapy omission prevents acute or late toxicities of the radiotherapy, as well as the constraints of daily travel over a period of 3 to 6 weeks.
The aim of this trial is to offer patients aged 65 and over with early breast cancer, after surgery, these three treatment options and to study the choice and experience of treatment by patients. This study will assess the reasons that prompted patients to choose one of the three treatment options, the impact of medical and personal characteristics on this choice and the experience of therapeutic de-escalation as well as its effects, in particular on the course of care.
This assessment will be carried out with self-administered questionnaires before and after the choice of treatment.
In addition, to standardize the information given to patients in order to support them in their treatment choice and promote patient involvement in treatment decision-making, an encounter decision aid will be available for the patients. This encounter will detail the advantages and disadvantages of the three treatment options and will help in discussions with the physicians to determine the best choice of treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
SBRT in Early Breast Cancer in Elderly Women
NCT05071105
Observational Study of Intra-operative Partial Irradiation of Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinomas With a Good Prognosis
NCT04414202
Radiation Therapy After Surgery in Treating Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer
NCT00005587
Radiotherapy Omission in Low Risk Ductal in Situ Carcinoma Breast
NCT03878342
Radiation Therapy in Women With Low Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer Who Have Undergone Breast Conservation Surgery
NCT00814567
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this context of limited life expectancy and of frequent comorbidities, therapeutic de-escalation (DE) might be proposed. Two options of de-escalation have been considered: (1) omission of adjuvant breast irradiation and (2) limiting the breast irradiated volume through a single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). As each of the three options (standard WBRT, IORT or no irradiation at all) has significant harms and benefits, treatment decision-making should not rely on the physician's opinion only.
A recent study has shown that in this context older women desire information and have more agency and input in the decision-making process than prior literature would suggest. The impact of therapeutic de-escalation on objective indicators and on patient reported outcomes must be investigated in current clinical practice, as uncertainties and doubt are likely to affect the decision-making process. When there is no definitive evidence to favour a treatment decision, assessing the patients' values and preferences appear to be of great relevance and value. Thus, the impact of therapeutic de-escalation on objective indicators and on patient reported outcomes (PROs) and experience (PRE) must be investigated, as uncertainty is likely to affect the decision-making process. We therefore propose to study the women's choice and experience of de-escalation of radiotherapy.
An encounter decision aid will be used to standardize the information provided about the three options and their outcomes. A prospective multicentre study using self-administered questionnaires before and after treatment decision making will then examine:
* the patient's choice and the impact of medical and patients' characteristics on this choice,
* the reason for the therapeutic choice from the patient's point of view,
* the experience of DE (patient-reported outcomes), and its medical effects (including care trajectories).
This study will document the rate and reasons of DE choice among French elderly early breast cancer patients. The results should facilitate the physician's reasoning at the time of treatment decision, and will also help patients (and their relatives) become better informed of the potential consequences of their choices. Developing a patient decision aid might also promote higher quality choices and shared decision-making in this context.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Whole breast radiotherapy after surgery
WBRT will be delivered at 50 Grays (2 Grays x 25 fractions), 5 days/week for 5 weeks after breast surgery
Whole breast radiotherapy
Whole breast radiotherapy after surgery
Intra Operative Radiotherapy
IORT will be delivered at a single dose of 20 grays to the tumor bed during breast surgery
Intra Operative Radiotherapy
Intra Operative Radiotherapy
no radiotherapy
No radiotherapy will be administrated to the patients during or after breast surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Whole breast radiotherapy
Whole breast radiotherapy after surgery
Intra Operative Radiotherapy
Intra Operative Radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Women ≥65 years of age
3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2
4. Clinical stage I, newly diagnosed breast cancer; invasive unifocal HR+ HER2- T1N0 tumour, not lobular, without extensive intraductal component (EIC) (\<25% EIC on biopsy), without embolism on biopsy
5. Eligible to surgery
6. Eligible for both WBRT or IORT
7. Chemotherapy treatment is possible if needed
8. Able to respond to self-report questionnaires in French
9. Affiliated to Social security System
Exclusion Criteria
2. Absolute contra-indication to whole-breast irradiation as determined by the referring physician
3. Patient unable to comply with study obligations for geographic, social, or physical reasons, or who is unable to understand the purpose and procedures of the study
4. Patient enrolled in another therapeutic trial. Observational cohorts are accepted if the collection of data does not interfere with the current trial
5. Person deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship.
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UNICANCER
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Julien MANCINI, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Equipe "Cancers Biomédecine & Société" (CANBIOS) UMR1252 SESSTIM, Institut Paoli Calmettes
Agnès TALLET, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UC-0107/1903
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.