Patient's Choice in the Reduction of Their Treatment in Women Over 65 Year With Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05058196

Last Updated: 2024-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Standard treatment for women with early breast cancer (HR+, HER2-, T1N0) consists of the removal of the tumor from the breast by surgery with or without chemotherapy, followed by a whole-breast radiation therapy (usually one radiation treatment a day, five days a week, for 3 to 6 weeks)

In some cases, for elderly patients older than 65 years with other associated pathologies, therapeutic de-escalation might be proposed in order to reduce the radiation doses received. Two options can be considered:

* Intraoperative radiotherapy: radiation is delivered in a single dose directly to the tumor bed during the surgery.
* Radiotherapy omission

These three treatment options (whole-breast radiation therapy, Intraoperative radiotherapy or -Radiotherapy omission) have advantages and disadvantages. Intraoperative radiotherapy allows a targeted treatment and avoids several weeks of daily radiation. Radiotherapy omission prevents acute or late toxicities of the radiotherapy, as well as the constraints of daily travel over a period of 3 to 6 weeks.

The aim of this trial is to offer patients aged 65 and over with early breast cancer, after surgery, these three treatment options and to study the choice and experience of treatment by patients. This study will assess the reasons that prompted patients to choose one of the three treatment options, the impact of medical and personal characteristics on this choice and the experience of therapeutic de-escalation as well as its effects, in particular on the course of care.

This assessment will be carried out with self-administered questionnaires before and after the choice of treatment.

In addition, to standardize the information given to patients in order to support them in their treatment choice and promote patient involvement in treatment decision-making, an encounter decision aid will be available for the patients. This encounter will detail the advantages and disadvantages of the three treatment options and will help in discussions with the physicians to determine the best choice of treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current demographic trends lead to an increasing number of breast cancers among 70+ women. In this population, adjuvant whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) after breast conserving surgery has proven its advantage on local control, but does not improve survival. Some experts are thus advocating WBRT omission.

In this context of limited life expectancy and of frequent comorbidities, therapeutic de-escalation (DE) might be proposed. Two options of de-escalation have been considered: (1) omission of adjuvant breast irradiation and (2) limiting the breast irradiated volume through a single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). As each of the three options (standard WBRT, IORT or no irradiation at all) has significant harms and benefits, treatment decision-making should not rely on the physician's opinion only.

A recent study has shown that in this context older women desire information and have more agency and input in the decision-making process than prior literature would suggest. The impact of therapeutic de-escalation on objective indicators and on patient reported outcomes must be investigated in current clinical practice, as uncertainties and doubt are likely to affect the decision-making process. When there is no definitive evidence to favour a treatment decision, assessing the patients' values and preferences appear to be of great relevance and value. Thus, the impact of therapeutic de-escalation on objective indicators and on patient reported outcomes (PROs) and experience (PRE) must be investigated, as uncertainty is likely to affect the decision-making process. We therefore propose to study the women's choice and experience of de-escalation of radiotherapy.

An encounter decision aid will be used to standardize the information provided about the three options and their outcomes. A prospective multicentre study using self-administered questionnaires before and after treatment decision making will then examine:

* the patient's choice and the impact of medical and patients' characteristics on this choice,
* the reason for the therapeutic choice from the patient's point of view,
* the experience of DE (patient-reported outcomes), and its medical effects (including care trajectories).

This study will document the rate and reasons of DE choice among French elderly early breast cancer patients. The results should facilitate the physician's reasoning at the time of treatment decision, and will also help patients (and their relatives) become better informed of the potential consequences of their choices. Developing a patient decision aid might also promote higher quality choices and shared decision-making in this context.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Whole breast radiotherapy after surgery

WBRT will be delivered at 50 Grays (2 Grays x 25 fractions), 5 days/week for 5 weeks after breast surgery

Group Type OTHER

Whole breast radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Whole breast radiotherapy after surgery

Intra Operative Radiotherapy

IORT will be delivered at a single dose of 20 grays to the tumor bed during breast surgery

Group Type OTHER

Intra Operative Radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Intra Operative Radiotherapy

no radiotherapy

No radiotherapy will be administrated to the patients during or after breast surgery

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Whole breast radiotherapy

Whole breast radiotherapy after surgery

Intervention Type RADIATION

Intra Operative Radiotherapy

Intra Operative Radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient must have signed a written informed consent form prior to any study specific procedures; when the patient is physically unable to give their written consent, a trusted person of their choice, independent from the investigator or the sponsor can confirm in writing the patient's consent
2. Women ≥65 years of age
3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2
4. Clinical stage I, newly diagnosed breast cancer; invasive unifocal HR+ HER2- T1N0 tumour, not lobular, without extensive intraductal component (EIC) (\<25% EIC on biopsy), without embolism on biopsy
5. Eligible to surgery
6. Eligible for both WBRT or IORT
7. Chemotherapy treatment is possible if needed
8. Able to respond to self-report questionnaires in French
9. Affiliated to Social security System

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient with recurrent breast cancer or inflammatory breast carcinoma
2. Absolute contra-indication to whole-breast irradiation as determined by the referring physician
3. Patient unable to comply with study obligations for geographic, social, or physical reasons, or who is unable to understand the purpose and procedures of the study
4. Patient enrolled in another therapeutic trial. Observational cohorts are accepted if the collection of data does not interfere with the current trial
5. Person deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UNICANCER

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julien MANCINI, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Equipe "Cancers Biomédecine & Société" (CANBIOS) UMR1252 SESSTIM, Institut Paoli Calmettes

Agnès TALLET, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UC-0107/1903

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.