AntiCoagulation Versus AcetylSalicylic Acid After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

NCT ID: NCT05035277

Last Updated: 2022-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-04

Study Completion Date

2026-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

ACASA-TAVI is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial assessing the value of anticoagulation therapy versus the standard antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. The trial will assess the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy compared to the standard single antiplatelet therapy to prevent degeneration of the valve and its safety in co-primary endpoints with blinded endpoint adjudication. The effect of DOAC therapy on hard clinical outcomes will be assessed during long-term follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aortic stenosis is a highly prevalent valvular disease and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an effective intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk. The procedure is highly effective, safe, and widely implemented. Current recommendations support transcatheter treatment of younger patients, including patients from 65 years of age with low surgical risk. This practice increases the importance of long-term valve maintenance.

Observational data have suggested that early signs of valve degeneration (i.e. hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening/thrombosis/reduced leaflet motion) are associated with an increased risk of embolic events. This is an increasing problem with emerging indications in younger populations. Because both ischemic and bleeding complications after TAVI can be life-threatening, it is important to establish the optimal anti-thrombotic treatment regime. Use of oral anticoagulation after implantation for bioprosthetic valves have been associated with resolved valve degeneration and possible favourable clinical effects.

The current practice guidelines recommend that oral anticoagulation may be considered for 3 months after open surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation. Patients with an independent indication for oral anticoagulation (i.e. atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism) are recommended to continue this treatment lifelong, but there is no recommendation for oral anticoagulation following TAVI in patients without other indications. In patients without indication for oral anticoagulation, the use of double anti-platelet therapy for 3-6 months following TAVI is recommended. However, single anti-platelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) without clopidogrel has been reported to improve bleeding outcomes and a composite of bleeding and ischemic outcomes. The effect of on oral anticoagulation-based treatment strategy compared to the standard single anti-platelet treatment strategy for valve maintenance after TAVI is unknown.

Increased anti-thrombotic treatment intensity may come at the cost of increased bleeding risk. Dual anti-platelet therapy and combination therapy with anticoagulation and anti-platelet therapy have both been associated with unfavourable outcomes. Combined anti-platelet and anti-coagulation treatment has been shown to reduce valve degeneration at the cost of increased bleeding. Conversely, single anti-platelet therapy and anti-coagulation with a direct oral anti-coagulant (DOAC) have been associated with similar bleeding risk. Bleeding rates in patients treated with anti-coagulation after TAVI have been reported to be slightly higher than in patients treated with ASA after TAVI, but patients with conventional indications for anti-coagulation have higher baseline bleeding risk than those without such indications. Therefore, the risk of bleeding in patients treated with DOAC or ASA following TAVI may be similar, but no randomized trials have been performed.

ACASA-TAVI will include 360 patients \> 65 years and \< 80 years of age who have undergone successful TAVI and have no conventional indication for DOAC in a prospective randomized open-label blinded-endpoint (PROBE) study. The intervention arm will be 12 month therapy with an anti-Xa type DOAC (without antiplatelet therapy) and the active control arm will be standard dose ASA. After 12 months, the intervention group will be switched to ASA maintenance. All patients will undergo clinical assessment, cardiac CT and echocardiography at 12 months with blinded endpoint adjudication by an independent committee.

Outcome measures will comply with the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) consensus, and are described in detail in the protocol. The co-primary endpoints at 12 months, hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and safety composite, must both be met for the trial to declare success.

The effect of the DOAC therapy on long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) will be assessed after 5 years and 10 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel group prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Separate endpoint adjudication committee blinded to randomized allocation of patients to treatment groups

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acetylsalicylic acid

Patients in the active control arm will receive 75 mg acetylsalicylic acid once daily indefinitely.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetylsalicylic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg once daily is the current standard-of-care in TAVI patients without other indications for anticoagulation therapy.

Direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC)

Patients in the experimental arm will receive an anti Xa-type DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban or edoxaban) in approved therapeutic dose for 12 months. The choice of DOAC agent will be made by the treating clinician after discussion with the patient. After 12 months, these patients will abort DOAC therapy. Acetylsalicylic acid, 75 mg once daily will be started after DOAC discontinuation and continued indefinitely.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Apixaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard dose apixaban will be one of the options for the patients in the experimental arm.

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard dose rivaroxaban will be one of the options for the patients in the experimental arm.

Edoxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard dose edoxaban will be one of the options for the patients in the experimental arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetylsalicylic acid

Acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg once daily is the current standard-of-care in TAVI patients without other indications for anticoagulation therapy.

Intervention Type DRUG

Apixaban

Standard dose apixaban will be one of the options for the patients in the experimental arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Rivaroxaban

Standard dose rivaroxaban will be one of the options for the patients in the experimental arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Edoxaban

Standard dose edoxaban will be one of the options for the patients in the experimental arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

B01A C06 B01A F02 B01A F01 B01A F03

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Successful trans-catheter aortic valve implantation in patients aged \>65 and \<80 years old at the time of the procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

* Strict indication for anticoagulation or anti-platelet drugs
* Strict contraindication for anticoagulation or anti-platelet drugs
* Overt cognitive failure
* Failure to obtain written informed consent
* Concomitant use of inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oslo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Øyvind Lie

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Øyvind H Lie, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oslo University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Haukeland University Hospital

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Oslo Univesity Hospital - Ullevål

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Øyvind H Lie, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4793429011

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jon Herstad, MD

Role: primary

Anders Opdahl, MD PhD

Role: primary

Øyvind Lie, MD PhD

Role: primary

+4793420911

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

VARC-3 WRITING COMMITTEE; Genereux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Blanke P, Blackstone EH, Finn MT, Kapadia S, Linke A, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Reardon M, Rodes-Cabau J, Van Mieghem NM, Webb JG, Cohen DJ, Leon MB. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33871579 (View on PubMed)

Dodgson CS, Beitnes JO, Klove SF, Herstad J, Opdahl A, Undseth R, Eek CH, Broch K, Gullestad L, Aaberge L, Lunde K, Bendz B, Lie OH. An investigator-sponsored pragmatic randomized controlled trial of AntiCoagulation vs AcetylSalicylic Acid after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Rationale and design of ACASA-TAVI. Am Heart J. 2023 Nov;265:225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37634655 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-001554-61

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

247400

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antithrombotic Triple Therapy in Humans
NCT01812200 COMPLETED PHASE4