Assessment of Quitting Versus Using Aspirin Therapy In Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Other Indication With Stabilized Coronary Artery Disease
NCT ID: NCT04217447
Last Updated: 2025-07-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
874 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-25
2024-10-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the standard antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with one or more risk factor for stroke (Class I, Level A).
* During the first year following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), several studies evaluating the combination of OAC treatment and antiplatelet therapy are either already published or ongoing.
* At distance of the index ACS and/or PCI, patients with stable CAD and concomitant AF remain at particular high-risk of ischemic (3 to 4 times higher as compared to patients with stable CAD without AF) and bleeding events. Antithrombotic management of these patients is subsequently highly challenging in clinical practice. The European task force suggests that the use of a full-dose anticoagulant monotherapy without any antiplatelet therapy should be the default strategy in such patients with both, AF and stable CAD.
* However, evidences are sparse and weak to support such a strategy (only observational studies with many biases) and no randomized trial has assessed this question. These patients, especially those at high-risk of recurrent ischemic events (post- ACS, diabetes, multivessel CAD…) may benefit from the combination of OAC and aspirin at long-term. Indeed the crude event rate of ischemic events is much higher than the crude event rate of bleeding in this specific population. Ischemic events are 2 to 3 times more frequent than bleeding in daily practice.
* The benefit/risk ratio of these two different strategies (ASA in combination with OAC vs. OAC alone) in patients at high-risk of recurrent coronary and vascular events remains unknown. Dual therapy with full-dose anticoagulation and ASA may lead to higher risk of major bleeding, while stopping ASA in stabilized high-risk patients after PCI may lead to poorer outcome regarding ischemic events.
* The coordinating investigators therefore designed a double blind placebo controlled trial in order to assess the optimal antithrombotic regimen that should be pursued long-life in this subset of patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Short Versus Long Antiplatelet Therapy After TAVI
NCT06518317
Optimizing Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy (BOchum CLopidogrel and Aspirin Plan)
NCT01212302
Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial With Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W)
NCT00243178
APixaban vs. PhenpRocoumon in Patients With ACS and AF: APPROACH-ACS-AF
NCT02789917
Less Bleeding by Omitting Aspirin in Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients
NCT05125276
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the standard antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with one or more risk factor for stroke (Class I, Level A).
* During the first year following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), several studies evaluating the combination of OAC treatment and antiplatelet therapy are either already published or ongoing.
* At distance of the index ACS and/or PCI, patients with stable CAD and concomitant AF remain at particular high-risk of ischemic (3 to 4 times higher as compared to patients with stable CAD without AF) and bleeding events. Antithrombotic management of these patients is subsequently highly challenging in clinical practice. The European task force suggests that the use of a full-dose anticoagulant monotherapy without any antiplatelet therapy should be the default strategy in such patients with both, AF and stable CAD.
* However, evidences are sparse and weak to support such a strategy (only observational studies with many biases) and no randomized trial has assessed this question. These patients, especially those at high-risk of recurrent ischemic events (post- ACS, diabetes, multivessel CAD…) may benefit from the combination of OAC and aspirin at long-term. Indeed the crude event rate of ischemic events is much higher than the crude event rate of bleeding in this specific population. Ischemic events are 2 to 3 times more frequent than bleeding in daily practice.
* The benefit/risk ratio of these two different strategies (ASA in combination with OAC vs. OAC alone) in patients at high-risk of recurrent coronary and vascular events remains unknown. Dual therapy with full-dose anticoagulation and ASA may lead to higher risk of major bleeding, while stopping ASA in stabilized high-risk patients after PCI may lead to poorer outcome regarding ischemic events.
AQUATIC is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study.
Randomization into 2 treatment groups and stratified on study center, type of OAC (VKA vs. DOAC), antithrombotic treatment received at the time of inclusion (dual therapy combining single antiplatelet therapy + OAC vs. OAC alone).
Experimental group : Patients intaking full-dose OAC + ASA 100mg od.
Control group : Patients intaking full-dose OAC + Placebo of ASA 100mg od.
Note:
* For Apixaban: in case of \> 1 of the followings: \> 80 years old, weight \< 60kg, creatinine level \> 133μmol/l; Or a creatinine clearance between 30 and 50 ml/min (Cockroft Formula), the dose of Apixaban will be reduced to 2.5 mg bid.
* For Rivaroxaban: in case of moderate creatinine clearance (Cockroft Formula) (between 30 and 50 ml/min) or severe renal insufficiency (between 15 and 29 ml/min) the dose of Rivaroxaban will be reduced to 15 mg od.
* For Dabigatran: in case of moderate creatinine clearance (Cockroft Formula) (between 30 and 50 ml/min) with age between 75 and 80 years: the dose of Dabigatran will be 150 mg bid or 110 mg bid, according to the ischemic and hemorrhagic risk of the patient. In case of age \> 80 years and/or concomitant administration of Verapamil, the dose of Dabigatran will be reduced to 110 mg bid.
* For VKA: target INR (International Normalised Ratio) between 2 and 3.
The primary efficacy objective is to demonstrate, in high-risk stabilized patients after PCI requiring also anticoagulation for AF, the superiority of the dual therapy ASA 100mg od + full-dose of OAC for 24-48 months versus full-dose of OAC alone (+ placebo) on a composite endpoint associating: cardio-vascular (CV) mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, systemic embolism, and acute limb ischemia.
The primary safety objective is major bleeding (ISTH : International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis).
The secondary efficacy objectives are evaluation of efficacy of dual therapy SA 100mg od + OAC full ose versus OAC alone (+placebo) for:
* The composite of CV mortality, MI (Myocardial Infarction ), stroke
* CV mortality
* All cause death
* Myocardial infarction (MI)
* Stent thrombosis (definite or probable)
* Stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or stroke of uncertain cause, transient ischemic attack \[TIA\])
* Coronary revascularization
* Systemic embolism
* Acute limb ischemia
Net clinical benefit:
* All cause mortality
* Major bleeding \[define according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH): an acute, linically overt bleeding accompanied by one or more of the following findings: 2g/dl decline in Hemoglobin level r = 2 red blood cell transfusions over a 24-hour period, leeding of a major organ (intracranial, intramedullary, intraocular, pericardial, interarticular, intramuscular and / or retro peritoneal) or fatal bleeding\]
* Thrombotic cardiovascular events:
* Myocardial infarction
* Stent thrombosis
* Stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or stroke of uncertain cause, TIA)
* Any coronary revascularization
* Systemic embolism
* Acute limb ischemia
The secondary safety objectives are :
* Major and clinically relevant non major bleeding (ISTH)
* Major bleeding (TIMI : Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction)
* Major bleeding (BARC ≥3 : Bleeding Academic Research Consortium)
All the included patients will be randomized at visit 1 and followed every 6 months until death or the end of the study (i.e. achievement of 2-year follow-up of the last included patient, maximum of 48 month followup for the first included patient).The first patient may require up to 9 visits .
2000 patients are expected to be included.
Inclusion period : 72 months. Duration of patient's participation: 24 to 48 months depending of time of inclusion.
Total study duration: 48 months.
All included patients will remain in the study until death or the end of the trial (i.e. achievement of 2-year follow-up of the last included patient).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Patients intaking full-dose OAC + ASA 100mg od
OAC + Aspirin 100mg od
Patients will receive full-dose of OAC + Aspirin 100mg od during 24 to 48 months (until death or the end of the study : i.e. achievement of 2-year follow-up of the last included patient, maximum of 48-month followup for the first included patient)
Control group
Patients intaking full-dose OAC + Placebo of ASA 100mg od
OAC + placebo of Aspirin 100mg od
Patients will receive full-dose of OAC + placebo of Aspirin 100mg od during 24 to 48 months (until death or the end of the study : i.e. achievement of 2-year follow-up of the last included patient, maximum of 48-month followup for the first included patient)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OAC + Aspirin 100mg od
Patients will receive full-dose of OAC + Aspirin 100mg od during 24 to 48 months (until death or the end of the study : i.e. achievement of 2-year follow-up of the last included patient, maximum of 48-month followup for the first included patient)
OAC + placebo of Aspirin 100mg od
Patients will receive full-dose of OAC + placebo of Aspirin 100mg od during 24 to 48 months (until death or the end of the study : i.e. achievement of 2-year follow-up of the last included patient, maximum of 48-month followup for the first included patient)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients that need anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for AF (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent) or other indication and have a stabilized CAD (free from MI, or coronary revascularization in the past year) but remain at high residual risk of recurrent coronary and vascular events. The use of DOAC will be promoted as recommended by guidelines.
* Two different categories of patients could be included in the study, i) patients treated at the time of inclusion with the association of OAC and single antiplatelet therapy, it will be tested for them aspirin vs. interruption of antiplatelet therapy ii) patients treated with OAC alone at the time of inclusion, it will be tested for them administration of aspirin vs. no additional treatment with aspirin.
* High-risk of coronary and vascular event is defined as follow :
1. History of PCI during an ACS involving placement of ≥1 stent(s) since \>6 months.
2. History of PCI (\>6 months) outside the context of ACS but with high-risk features of ischemic event recurrences defined as: diabetes, or diffuse multivessel disease (defined by the involvement of the 3 coronary vessels), or chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance \< 50ml/min), or prior stent thrombosis, or complex PCI (defined by: stenting of the last remaining patent coronary artery, left main, at least 3 stents implanted and/or 3 lesions treated, bifurcation with two stents, length of stent \>60mm and chronic total coronary occlusion) or the presence of peripheral artery disease (previous limb revascularization bypass or percutaneous angioplasty, previous limb or foot amputation for arterial vascular disease, history of intermittent claudication of peripheral artery stenosis (≥50%) ,previous carotid revascularization or carotid stenosis ≥50%).
* Women of childbearing potential with effective contraception defined as
* combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation :
* oral
* intravaginal
* transdermal
* progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation :
* oral
* injectable
* implantable
* intrauterine device (IUD)
* intrauterine hormone-releasing system ( IUS)
* bilateral tubal occlusion
* vasectomised partner
* sexual abstinence
Exclusion Criteria
* High risk of bleeding defined as recent (≤6 months) ISTH major bleeding event
* Constitutional or acquired haemorrhagic disease including gastrointestinal bleeding and thrombocytopenia
* Planned PCI within the next 6 months after randomization or subject requiring P2Y12 receptor antagonist therapy
* Stroke within 1 month or any history of hemorrhagic stroke
* Any contraindication to aspirin (ASA) or any of these excipients or other NSAIDs (hypersensitivity, allergy, active bleeding)
* Any contraindication to anticoagulant
* History (s) of asthma induced by the administration of salicylates or substances of close activity (especially NSAIDs)
* Evolutionary gastroduodenal ulcer
* Any other gastroduodenal history
* Severe renal insufficiency
* Severe hepatic insufficiency
* Severe, uncontrolled heart failure
* Lactose intolerance
* Pregnancy
* Breastfeeding patients
* Unable (protected adults : tutorship, curatorship) orunwilling to consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bayer
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Brest
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHRU d'Amiens
Amiens, France, France
CHU d'Angers
Angers, France, France
CH d'Annecy-Genevois
Annecy, France, France
CH d'Antibes
Antibes, France, France
CH d'Arras
Arras, France, France
CH d'Avignon
Avignon, France, France
CH de la Côte Basque - Bayonne
Bayonne, France, France
Hôpital Haut Lévêque -CHU Bordeaux-Pessac
Bordeaux, France, France
CHU de Brest
Brest, France, France
Hôpital Louis Pradel - Bron
Bron, France, France
Centre Hospitalier René Dubos - Cergy Pontoise
Cergy-Pontoise, France, France
CH Chalon sur Saône
Chalon-sur-Saône, France, France
CH Louis Pasteur - Chartres - Le Coudray
Chartres, France, France
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France, France
CH Compiègne
Compiègne, France, France
CH Sud Francilien Corbeil-Essonnes
Corbeil-Essonnes, France, France
Hôpital Henri Mondor - Créteil
Créteil, France, France
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, France, France
GHM - Grenoble
Grenoble, France, France
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, France, France
Clinique St Clothilde -La Réunion
La Réunion, France, France
CH de Lens
Lens, France, France
CHRU de Lille
Lille, France, France
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, France, France
CH St Joseph-St Luc Lyon
Lyon, France, France
Marseille-Hôpital Nord
Marseille, France, France
Marseille- Hôpital La Timone
Marseille, France, France
CH Martigues
Martigues, France, France
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, France, France
Clinique du Millénaire - Montpellier
Montpellier, France, France
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France, France
CHR d'Orléans
Orléans, France, France
Paris-Lariboisière
Paris, France, France
Paris-Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, France, France
Paris-HEGP Cardiologie
Paris, France, France
Paris-HEGP Médecine vasculaire
Paris, France, France
Paris-Bichat
Paris, France, France
CH de Pau
Pau, France, France
CH Périgueux
Périgueux, France, France
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, France, France
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, France, France
Clinique St Hilaire - Rouen
Rouen, France, France
CHU de Rouen
Rouen, France, France
CH de Seclin
Seclin, France, France
Clinique Rhena - Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France, France
CHU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France, France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, France, France
Clinique Pasteur-Toulouse
Toulouse, France, France
CHRU de Tours
Tours, France, France
Hôpital André Mignot - CH de Versailles
Versailles, France, France
CHU de Nancy - Hôpitaux de Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lemesle G, Didier R, Steg PG, Simon T, Montalescot G, Danchin N, Bauters C, Blanchard D, Bouleti C, Angoulvant D, Andrieu S, Vanzetto G, Kerneis M, Decalf V, Puymirat E, Mottier D, Diallo A, Vicaut E, Gilard M, Cayla G; AQUATIC Trial Investigators. Aspirin in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome Receiving Oral Anticoagulation. N Engl J Med. 2025 Aug 31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2507532. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
29BRC19.0116
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.