RFA Combined With Chemotherapy for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma

NCT ID: NCT05028439

Last Updated: 2023-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant tumor that is highly malignant and difficult to diagnose and treat early. Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been reported to be a beneficial treatment option for palliation of malignant biliary strictures. Within the bile duct, RFA appears to be safe and may result in decreased tumor ingrowth. To date, little is known about the role of the addition of systemic chemotherapy to RFA for cholangiocarcinoma. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of RAF combined with Gemcitabine and S-1 in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over 60 % of common bile duct (CBD) obstructions are due to malignancy, and the majority of neoplasms are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Biliary drainage with placement of metal or plastic stents for palliation is the therapy of choice in this set of patients.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is well established method for treatment of some solid tumors, like liver cancer, lung cancer, etc. Recently, an endoscopically applicable radiofrequency probe, HabibTM EndoHBP catheter, was approved for clinical use. RFA uses a high-frequency alternating current to generate heat and achieve coagulative necrosis when in contact with tissue. Many studies showed RFA with biliary stent was a beneficial treatment option for palliation of malignant biliary strictures. However, most of therapeutic effects were expected to delay bile duct obstruction rather than to decrease the tumor. Recently orally available chemotherapeutic agent, S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, was reported as effective in patients with bile duct adenocarcinoma. To date, little is known about the role of the addition of systemic chemotherapy to RFA for cholangiocarcinoma.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of RAF combined with Gemcitabine and S-1 in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RAF combined with gemcitabine and S-1 group

Patients will receive endobiliary radiofrequency ablation ( RFA) followed by plastic stent(s) placement, and be treated with gemcitabine and S-1 within 1 month after RFA.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

radiofrequency ablation

Intervention Type DEVICE

All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy. Cholangiogram was performed to confirm stricture location, length and diameter. The Habib Endo HPB (Hepatobiliary) probe (EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was then advanced over a wire at the level of the biliary stricture and ablation using ERBE generator set at 7-10 watts for a time period of 90-120 s was conducted. A 1- to 2-min resting period after energy delivery was allowed before moving the catheter along the length of the stricture to ablate the rest of the stricture. Plastic stent(s) were placed after RFA depending on the location of the malignant obstruction

Chemotherapy drug

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1,8; S-1 80 mg/m2 was taken orally twice for two weeks. The curative effect was evaluated comprehensively for each 2 cycles of chemotherapy

RFA-only gruop

Patients will only receive endobiliary radiofrequency ablation ( RFA) followed by plastic stent(s) placement

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

radiofrequency ablation

Intervention Type DEVICE

All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy. Cholangiogram was performed to confirm stricture location, length and diameter. The Habib Endo HPB (Hepatobiliary) probe (EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was then advanced over a wire at the level of the biliary stricture and ablation using ERBE generator set at 7-10 watts for a time period of 90-120 s was conducted. A 1- to 2-min resting period after energy delivery was allowed before moving the catheter along the length of the stricture to ablate the rest of the stricture. Plastic stent(s) were placed after RFA depending on the location of the malignant obstruction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

radiofrequency ablation

All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy. Cholangiogram was performed to confirm stricture location, length and diameter. The Habib Endo HPB (Hepatobiliary) probe (EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was then advanced over a wire at the level of the biliary stricture and ablation using ERBE generator set at 7-10 watts for a time period of 90-120 s was conducted. A 1- to 2-min resting period after energy delivery was allowed before moving the catheter along the length of the stricture to ablate the rest of the stricture. Plastic stent(s) were placed after RFA depending on the location of the malignant obstruction

Intervention Type DEVICE

Chemotherapy drug

Gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1,8; S-1 80 mg/m2 was taken orally twice for two weeks. The curative effect was evaluated comprehensively for each 2 cycles of chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

oral fluoropyrimidine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Obtention of a written informed consent.
* Patient with histologically proved cholangiocarcinoma ; histologic diagnosis must be proved by biliary brushing, bile cytology, endobiliary biopsy under Spyglass, or by EUS-FNA.
* Patient with Karnofsky score \> 60, ECOG\>level 2
* Patient capable of fill in the quality of life questionnaire
* For the first time treatment
* CT, MRCP, EUS and other examinations indicate that the tumor has locally infiltrated large blood vessels and cannot be surgically removed

Exclusion Criteria

* No written informed consent
* Patients under or already treated by radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatment for cholangiocarcinoma.
* Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women
* Serious abnormalities in liver and kidney function and coagulation function
* The ERCP guide wire cannot pass the stricture due to severe biliary stricture
* Merge with other malignant tumors
* Use other treatments that may affect the observation, such as radioactive particles or seed stent implantation, P53 injection, oral chemotherapy, interventional therapy, etc.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hangzhou Cancer Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Changhai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Xijing Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jianfeng Yang

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Xiaofeng Zhang, M.S

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hangzhou First People's Hospital

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Laquiere A, Boustiere C, Leblanc S, Penaranda G, Desilets E, Prat F. Safety and feasibility of endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1242-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4322-7. Epub 2015 Jul 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26162420 (View on PubMed)

Butros SR, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Mueller PR, Arellano RS. Radiofrequency ablation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: feasability, local tumor control, and long-term outcome. Clin Imaging. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(4):490-494. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24637151 (View on PubMed)

Strand DS, Cosgrove ND, Patrie JT, Cox DG, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Mann JA, Sauer BG, Shami VM, Wang AY. ERCP-directed radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy are associated with comparable survival in the treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Nov;80(5):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1030. Epub 2014 May 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24836747 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-08-17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bioinformation Therapy for Intestinal Cancer
NCT03350490 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Bioinformation Therapy for Gastric Cancer
NCT03350477 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3