Differences in the Effectiveness of Electromagnetic Stimulation Therapy and Kegel Exercises Based on Compliance, Subjective - Objective Symptoms and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Postpartum Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT05021302

Last Updated: 2021-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Electromagnetic stimulation is a new modality and alternative in women with urinary incontinence (UI). However, there was not much evidence that compares the use of electromagnetic stimulation to Kegel Exercises in post-partum stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We evaluate the compliance rate, effectiveness (UDI-6 and 1-hour pad test), and pelvic muscle strength of electromagnetic stimulation on stress urinary incontinence compared with Kegel pelvic floor muscle exercises in post-partum women as conservative therapy. This study was a single-blind randomized trial in postpartum women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence who came to YPK Mandiri Hospital. We recruited 40 Patients and were randomized into two groups, the electromagnetic stimulation (n=20) and Kegel exercises (n=20). The electromagnetic stimulation procedure was done three times a week for five weeks, and the Kegel exercises group will be instructed to do the exercises every day for eight weeks. Our primary objective is to measure compliance, symptom reduction (using the UDI-6 questionnaire and the 1-hour pad test), and pelvic floor muscle strength.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We evaluate the compliance rate, effectiveness (UDI-6 and 1-hour pad test), and pelvic muscle strength of electromagnetic stimulation on stress urinary incontinence compared with Kegel pelvic floor muscle exercises in post-partum women as conservative therapy. This was a Single-blind randomized clinical trial in 40 post-partum women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence from at least three months post-partum from March 2020 to February 2021 at YPK Mandiri Jakarta Hospital. We recruited consecutively for 40 patients divided into two groups based on type I error of 5% and type II error of 10%. The study population included all post-partum patients diagnosed with SUI over three months. Subjects that are included were signed an informed consent form, post-partum women aged 20 years or over with a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence since three months post-partum, found a urine leakage when coughing when the bladder volume was 200 to 250 ml, and was able to perform a pad test 1 hour. The study subjects were excluded if the subject complained of mixed incontinence, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, grade 3 and 4 pelvic organ prolapse, chronic degenerative disease/trauma that affected muscle and nerve function, previous history of pelvic surgery, or a pacemaker. Then, the patients were randomly selected using a computer, namely simple randomization for treatment (Kegel muscle exercises or electromagnetic stimulation).

Kegel exercises had to be done every day for eight weeks. The kegel exercise consisted of two types of training. The first one is contracting and relaxing the fast-twitch muscle. Subjects contracted their muscle for two seconds and followed by four seconds of resting. The next part of the training was for slow-twitch muscles. Subjects needed to contract their pelvic muscle for five seconds and followed by ten seconds rest. All of the training was done alone, five times/set and five sets/day. The time took for a session is approximately two minutes, and it took ten minutes to complete the exercise. To evaluate the patient's compliance, a self-written control card and interview were used, with follow-up every two weeks.

Meanwhile, for those who received an electromagnetic stimulation chair, the patient sat on a magnetic chair with their perineum on the center allow the maximum effect of the magnetic field on the pelvic floor and sphincter muscles. We used NOVAMAG NT-60 chair (NOVAMedtek, Turkey) for our electromagnetic stimulation regiment. The Electromagnetic stimulation consists of 15 sessions with 20 minutes duration and three times a week for five weeks. At the end of each session, subjects were also asked to fill out a control card as proof of attendance. Subjects that were unable to complete 80% of the intended therapy regiment would be classified as not compliant.

Subjects' pelvic floor muscle strength was measured using Peritron by an obstetrician before and after the intervention. To measure their pelvic floor muscle, the patient was asked to contract the pelvic floor muscles and tightly hold for 2 to 3 seconds. Three experiments will be conducted with a break of 10 seconds between contractions, and the value taken is the highest measurement value. Physicians that evaluated the pelvic floor muscle strength will be blinded for the group allocation to reduce bias.

The UDI-6 questionnaire had been translated back and forth and validated. A reduction in the UDI-6 score is treated as a positive result or an improvement of symptoms. 1-hour pad test was used to evaluate their symptoms objectively. Based on the Committee International Continence Society (ICS), an increase of pad weight by 2-10 grams classified as light SUI, 10-50 grams as medium SUI, ≥50 grams as severe SUI. We evaluate all the subjects' symptoms before and after the therapy sessions. Physicians that evaluated the UDI-6 and 1-hour pad test will be blinded for the group allocation to reduce bias.

The dropout criteria of both groups are subjects who do not fill out the control card for at least one week consecutively. Patients are compliant when they attend or done 80% of the intended regimens of therapy.

Subjects' characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Parametric or Non-parametric tests were done appropriately to the normality test of the sample. We used SPSS statistics 21.0 for data analysis and the cut-off for statistical significance of 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Urinary Incontinence Postpartum

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We recruited consecutively for 40 patients divided into two groups by simple randomization, with 20 participants in each group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Physicians that evaluated the perineometer, UDI-6, and 1-hour pad test will be blinded for the group allocation to reduce bias

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Kegel exercises group

20 women in this group

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Kegel Exercises

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Self-supporting pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises performed at home by contracting and relaxing quickly (2 seconds of contraction and 4 seconds of rest), followed by a slow contraction (contraction for 5 seconds, and rest for 10 seconds with five times each) five sets per day. The average length of exercise for each session is 2 minutes, with total exercise per day is 50 times. Thus, the total length of exercise is 10 minutes. It was done every day for eight weeks.

Electromagnetic stimulation group

20 women in this group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NOVAMAG NT-60

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Electromagnetic stimulation consists of 15 sessions with 20 minutes duration and three times a week. The total length of therapy is five weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NOVAMAG NT-60

The Electromagnetic stimulation consists of 15 sessions with 20 minutes duration and three times a week. The total length of therapy is five weeks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Kegel Exercises

Self-supporting pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises performed at home by contracting and relaxing quickly (2 seconds of contraction and 4 seconds of rest), followed by a slow contraction (contraction for 5 seconds, and rest for 10 seconds with five times each) five sets per day. The average length of exercise for each session is 2 minutes, with total exercise per day is 50 times. Thus, the total length of exercise is 10 minutes. It was done every day for eight weeks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pelvic floor muscle training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* postpartum women aged 20 years or over with a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence three months postpartum
* signed an informed consent form
* a urine leakage when coughing with bladder volume 200 to 250 ml
* able to perform a pad test 1-hour

Exclusion Criteria

* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* grade 3 and 4 pelvic organ prolapse
* mixed incontinence in the patient
* chronic degenerative disease/trauma that affected muscle and nerve function
* previous history of pelvic surgery
* pacemaker
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indonesia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

dr. Roziana M.Ked, SpOG

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

RS YPK Mandiri

Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta Special Capital Region, Indonesia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Indonesia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lim R, Lee SW, Tan PY, Liong ML, Yuen KH. Efficacy of electromagnetic therapy for urinary incontinence: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Nov;34(8):713-22. doi: 10.1002/nau.22672. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25251335 (View on PubMed)

Fujishiro T, Enomoto H, Ugawa Y, Takahashi S, Ueno S, Kitamura T. Magnetic stimulation of the sacral roots for the treatment of stress incontinence: an investigational study and placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1277-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10992380 (View on PubMed)

Stewart F, Berghmans B, Bo K, Glazener CM. Electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD012390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012390.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29271482 (View on PubMed)

Peng L, Zeng X, Shen H, Luo DY. Magnetic stimulation for female patients with stress urinary incontinence, a meta-analysis of studies with short-term follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15572. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015572.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31083230 (View on PubMed)

Cacciari LP, Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith EJ. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women: a cochrane systematic review abridged republication. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):93-107. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30704907 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-05-0561

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.