MUA's Efficacy in Frozen Shoulder in Patients Which Already Received an Hidrodilatation

NCT ID: NCT05001438

Last Updated: 2021-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-31

Study Completion Date

2023-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hidrodilatation alone is as efective as Hidrodilatation + Movilization under anesthesia to treat the frozen shoulder

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

"Frozen shoulder" disease is a pathological entity defined by the presence of a painful shoulder accompanied by restricted mobility. It affects 2% of the population with a slight predominance in women and the average age ranges between 40 and 60 years. The diagnosis of frozen shoulder is clinical and by exclusion; it presents with constant pain, especially at night, which increases on sudden mobilization, with restriction of at least two axes of shoulder mobility, especially external rotation and abduction.

The initial treatment of these patients is always conservative and consists of the association of pharmacological treatment (analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs) together with a specific rehabilitation program. However, in many cases recovery is not complete and many patients require additional more invasive treatments.

Hydrodilation is a technique described in 1965 that consists of infiltrating 20-40 cc of serum into the glenohumeral joint to distend the joint capsule. In most cases, it is also associated with intra-articular corticosteroid and anesthetic infiltration to add an anti-inflammatory and anesthetic effect to joint distention. Several studies have shown good results with this treatment, however, many patients persist with pain and significant functional limitations despite this treatment.

Joint Mobilization Under general Anesthesia (MUA) is a more invasive alternative therapeutic technique that consists of a controlled mobilization under general anesthesia to break the synovial adhesions and the joint capsule, with the objective of increasing the range of motion. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this treatment, considered today a valid option for the treatment of frozen shoulder refractory to more conservative treatment.

Some studies have already compared the effectiveness of hydrodilatation with MUA as treatments for frozen shoulder. Jacob et al. demonstrated the same effectiveness between hydrodilatation and MUA, however, MUA reported a higher rate of iatrogenesis: hemarthrosis and lesions in the labrum, glenohumeral ligament or subscapularis ligament. However, there is no study evaluating the synergy of both techniques in the treatment of painful shoulder.

The aim of the present study is to assess the clinical efficacy of the combination of hydrodilatation and MUA in patients with frozen shoulder and to compare it with hydrodilatation alone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Frozen Shoulder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hidro alone

The patient receives the Hidrodilatation guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hidro

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.

Hidro + MUA

The patient receives the Hidrodilatation guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.

After the Hidrodilatation the patient is sedated and then a Movilization of the glenohumeral joint is performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hidro

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.

MUA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Movilization under anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hidro

Guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

MUA

Movilization under anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with "frozen shoulder", defined as painful shoulder accompanied with a greater or lesser degree of restriction of mobility, especially in passive external rotation of at least 3 months of evolution. The diagnosis, according to the usual protocol of the unit, should include radiological images that rule out degenerative or necrotic pathology and the performance of an ultrasound or MRI to rule out associated pathology of the rotator cuff, which are already obtained in the usual clinical follow-up.
* Failure of conservative treatment after a period of 3 months.
* Acceptance and signature of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known allergies to corticosteroids
* Patients with frozen shoulder secondary to previous shoulder surgery.
* High-risk patients in need of anticoagulant treatments.
* Patients with previous shoulder fracture.
* History of joint infection.
* Active neoplastic process.
* Associated rheumatic pathology.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GUILLEM CLARET, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Specialty surgeon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital ClĂ­nic

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

GUILLEM CLARET, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+34-932275500 ext. 5533

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

GUILLEM CLARET, Dr.

Role: primary

+34-932275500 ext. 5533

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HCB/2021/0567

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Scapular Mobilization Versus Capsular Stretch
NCT06705426 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Rotator Cuff Pathway
NCT03717753 COMPLETED NA