MUA's Efficacy in Frozen Shoulder in Patients Which Already Received an Hidrodilatation
NCT ID: NCT05001438
Last Updated: 2021-08-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-31
2023-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Prolotherapy and Hydrodilatation for Frozen Shoulder
NCT05448794
Ultrasound Guided Shoulder Anterior Capsular Infiltration Plus Hydrodilatation With Steroid Versus Hyalase in Patients With Frozen Shoulder
NCT06129006
Application of an Exercise Program Versus Exercise Plus Manual Therapy in the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis.
NCT06497348
The Effect of Combined Hydrodilatation, Corticosteroid Injection, and Joint Mobilization for Treament of Frozen Shoulder
NCT04474145
The Effects of Two Different Treatment Protocols on Shoulder Function, Quality of Life, and Ultrasound Parameters in Patients With Frozen Shoulder
NCT05956171
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The initial treatment of these patients is always conservative and consists of the association of pharmacological treatment (analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs) together with a specific rehabilitation program. However, in many cases recovery is not complete and many patients require additional more invasive treatments.
Hydrodilation is a technique described in 1965 that consists of infiltrating 20-40 cc of serum into the glenohumeral joint to distend the joint capsule. In most cases, it is also associated with intra-articular corticosteroid and anesthetic infiltration to add an anti-inflammatory and anesthetic effect to joint distention. Several studies have shown good results with this treatment, however, many patients persist with pain and significant functional limitations despite this treatment.
Joint Mobilization Under general Anesthesia (MUA) is a more invasive alternative therapeutic technique that consists of a controlled mobilization under general anesthesia to break the synovial adhesions and the joint capsule, with the objective of increasing the range of motion. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this treatment, considered today a valid option for the treatment of frozen shoulder refractory to more conservative treatment.
Some studies have already compared the effectiveness of hydrodilatation with MUA as treatments for frozen shoulder. Jacob et al. demonstrated the same effectiveness between hydrodilatation and MUA, however, MUA reported a higher rate of iatrogenesis: hemarthrosis and lesions in the labrum, glenohumeral ligament or subscapularis ligament. However, there is no study evaluating the synergy of both techniques in the treatment of painful shoulder.
The aim of the present study is to assess the clinical efficacy of the combination of hydrodilatation and MUA in patients with frozen shoulder and to compare it with hydrodilatation alone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hidro alone
The patient receives the Hidrodilatation guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.
Hidro
Guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.
Hidro + MUA
The patient receives the Hidrodilatation guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.
After the Hidrodilatation the patient is sedated and then a Movilization of the glenohumeral joint is performed.
Hidro
Guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.
MUA
Movilization under anesthesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hidro
Guided by ultrasonography under anesthetic blockage of the circumflex nerve and the supraescapular nerve. The hidrodilatation is achieved by insuflating the articulation with 2 cc of trigon depot + 10 cc 1% mepivacain + 11 cc saline serum.
MUA
Movilization under anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Failure of conservative treatment after a period of 3 months.
* Acceptance and signature of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with frozen shoulder secondary to previous shoulder surgery.
* High-risk patients in need of anticoagulant treatments.
* Patients with previous shoulder fracture.
* History of joint infection.
* Active neoplastic process.
* Associated rheumatic pathology.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GUILLEM CLARET, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Specialty surgeon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital ClĂnic
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HCB/2021/0567
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.