Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1038 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-05-16
2024-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Microfluidic Sperm Sorting (MSS) technology reduces the time of sample preparation while selects a sperm population with better motility and less DNA fragmentation as compared to routine procedures. This med-ical device is already CE marked.
Having the intention to implement this technology in our department, we conduct this study to investigate whether the use of MSS has at least the same impact, if not better, on fertilization and embryo quality as compared to standard sperm selection procedures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Live Birth Rate After Sperm Selection Using ZyMōt Multi (850µL) Device for Intra Uterine Insemination
NCT06144268
Selection of Non Apoptotic Human Sperm for in Vitro Fertilization by Using Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS)
NCT03988361
A Sibling Oocyte Study- Comparison of ZyMotTM Microfluidics Device to Density Gradient for Sperm Selection During ICSI
NCT04818593
Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods
NCT04962074
Evaluating the Utility of Implementing Microfluids for Sperm Preparation Compared to Conventional Method of Density Gradient Centrifugation in a PGT-A Program: a Sibling Oocyte Study
NCT07093619
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A more "close to nature" approach is now available due to the microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS) technology that is using FERTILE series devices (FERTILE and FERTILE PLUS, Koek EU, GmbH). The method is based on the principle of natural sperm selection in a passage through micro-barriers imitating natural environment of female reproductive system (fallopian tubes).
This chemical-free technology does not require any pretreatment of the semen sample, while the sorted sperm shows high motility and low levels of DNA damage. At the day of pick up, the husband provides the semen sample. The sample obtained will be divided in 2 fractions: one fraction will be subject to Microfluidic technology (fraction 1) and the other fraction will represent the control (conventionally prepared sperm; fraction 2).
This device was tested in our laboratory on diagnostic semen samples and proved to select the best sperm population when compared to the standard method.
Due to the encouraging results, we intend to apply microfluidic as the routine procedure for sperm preparation in our department. This procedure will increase the chance of using sperm cells without DNA damage during ICSI and therefore we expect better embryological outcome.
This clinical study has been organised to determine if the embryo quality on day 5 will be similar or better when using microfluidic technology compared to standard procedure.
At the moment of ICSI, half of the eggs of good quality (mature) will be inseminated with sperm from fraction 1 and the other half with sperm from fraction 2. The decision of which fraction will be used to inject the first half of the oocytes is random and is based on a list generated by the computer.
The retrieved oocytes will follow the normal lab procedure after injection: the embryos available on day 3 or day 5/6 that meet our criteria for transfer or cryopreservation will be used for transfer or cryopreservation, no matter from which fraction the sperm was used.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Day 5 or day 3/5 embryo culture
* Fresh semen samples with ≥ 1x106 sperm/ml (raw) and Motility of 30% Grade A+B
* At least 6 follicles of ≥14 mm at the day of hCG administration
* Minimum 6 mature oocytes after oocyte pick up
Exclusion Criteria
* Cycles with testicular sample
* In vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles
* In vitro maturation cycles
* Managed Natural Cycles (MNC)
* Egg bank- Acceptors
* PGT cycles
18 Years
43 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CRG UZ Brussel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Koen Wouters
Clinical Embryologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Koen Wouters, Msc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brussels IVF
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UZ Brussel
Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-185
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.