Bacterial Reduction and Post Operative Endodontic-pain Using Different Kinematics

NCT ID: NCT04990115

Last Updated: 2021-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was conducted to compare the antibacterial effect and degree of postoperative pain of single rotary and reciprocating file systems during endodontic therapy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Instrumentation kinematic is one of the many aspects of shaping files that underwent heavy development through the last decade. The impact of the type of motion used to drive shaping instruments was heavily studied but mostly in-vitro. More randomized clinical trials are needed to achieve a reliable body of data concerning the issue.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of varying shaping files' kinematics on bacterial reduction, post-operative pain and the incidence of flare-ups. Methods: Necrotic, asymptomatic, single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were used in the study, where 46 patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group, WaveOne Gold was used for mechanical preparation while One Shape was used in the second group. Samples were taken preoperatively (S1) and after chemomechanical preparation (S2). Bacterial reduction was evaluated and compared between both groups via culturing technique and quantitative analysis by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Post-operative pain and the incidence of flare-ups were also evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Root Canal Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The trial design is a prospective, parallel, randomized with an allocation ratio (1:1), double-blinded, single-center clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Sequentially generated numbers were placed in opaque envelopes until the intervention was conducted and each participant was asked to select an envelope that determine which group of intervention was assumed

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rotation

root canal preparation performed using rotating instruments

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

root canal shaping

Intervention Type OTHER

root canal treatment

reciprocation

root canal preparation performed using reciprocating instruments

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

root canal shaping

Intervention Type OTHER

root canal treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

root canal shaping

root canal treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* mandibular premolars
* single rooted
* single canalled
* necrotic pulps
* asymptomatic apical periodontitis

Exclusion Criteria

* gross caries
* root/crown fracture
* sinus tract
* swelling
* intake of antibiotics within previous 3 months
* pain with percussion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shehab El Din Mohamed Saber

professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

shehabeldin M Saber, phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry. Ain Shams University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FDASU-RECD091615

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.