CPAP or BiPAP for Motion Mitigation During Radiotherapy
NCT ID: NCT04986293
Last Updated: 2024-06-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
With Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP), tidal volume excursions are determined by the pressure difference between the set inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) and the set expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP). This mode of ventilation increases lung volume comparable to CPAP, but also to control tidal volumes and breathing frequency. However, BiPAP has never been studied in the setting of motion mitigation during radiotherapy and BiPAP might be more difficult to adjust to for patients compared to CPAP. Therefore, the current study is proposed to evaluate whether or not CPAP or BiPAP is of benefit in patients that undergo radiotherapy for larger intra-thoracic tumor volumes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Tumor Motion Management in Radiotherapy
NCT02324530
CPAP for Motion Management in Breast Radiotherapy; and Lung & Liver SABR
NCT05396950
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Device or Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Reducing Tumor Motion in Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer
NCT03422302
Mechanically-Assisted and Non-Invasive Ventilation for Breathing-related Tumor Motion Mitigation.
NCT04457102
Optimizing (Breathing) Techniques for Radiotherapy of Esophageal and Lung Carcinomas
NCT02497664
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
First (Phase 1, n=10), the feasibility of short-term use of CPAP and BiPAP and its effects on (regional) lung volumes, tidal volumes and breathing frequency will be investigated in patients with intra-thoracic tumors who are planned for radiotherapy. This is necessary to select the best setting of CPAP or BiPAP with which minimal tumor motion is expected (and that is feasible for the patient).
In the second phase (n=21), the particular setting found in fase 1 is investigated: weekly repeated radiotherapy planning (4D) CT scans with and without CPAP/BiPAP will be aquired to evaluate the influence on tumor motion and dose to the target and organs at risk. Radiotherapy will be deliverd according to local protocol without the use of CPAP/BiPAP.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPAP
Different settings of CPAP and BiPAP will be tested using a home mechanical ventilator
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stage III/IV (N)SCLC, esophageal cancer or malignant lymphoma that will be treated with curative intent
* WHO 0-2.
* Written informed consent
* Planned for radiotherapy with fraction dose ≥3 Gy.
* Severe heart failure (LVEF\<30%)
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
R. Wijsman
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robin Wijsman
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMCG
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL71871.042.19/RT2019-17
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.