Comparison of Conjunctival Antimicrobial Activity and Patient Comfort Between Topical Hypochlorous Acid (Avenova) and Betadine

NCT ID: NCT04981860

Last Updated: 2025-07-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

230 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-06

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to find out how Avenova (0.01 % hypochlorous acid) works compared to Betadine (Povidone iodide) for reducing bacteria and patient discomfort in the eyes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

About two percent of the population have an iodine allergy 1. A percentage of this population will also have a reaction to iodine-containing agents, including povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®), which is the current standard of care for anti-septic preparation for conjunctival procedures. Despite being known to have a toxic effect on the cornea 2 and causing allergic reactions in some individuals, povidone Iodine (PI) (Betadine®) is still the most commonly used antiseptic agent for surgical scrub. Currently, there are no equivalent alternative prep agents available, although chlorhexidine has occasionally served as an alternative to povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®) with variable results 2. Some studies have reported significantly less pain in patients prepped with chlorhexidine compared to povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®) 2, and other studies have demonstrated that chlorhexidine has equal efficacy to povidone iodine (PI)(Betadine®) in decreasing the colony forming units of microbes both in vitro and in vivo 3. Although there have been no known reported allergies to chlorhexidine, it is known to be toxic to the cornea (leading to severe keratitis) and has proven to be less effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) 4.

The use of 0.01% hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in saline solution as an antiseptic agent has been gaining popularity as a possible alternative to povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®). Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is produced in vivo by neutrophils and causes oxidation of microbial nucleotides and inactivation of microbial enzymes, leading to cell death. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) has a faster optimal kill-time for flora common to the eye 4, and has proven to be non-cytotoxic and well tolerated for continuous use 4,5,6. In vitro studies of 0.01% hypochlorous acid (HOCl) were found to have equal or more efficacious antiseptic properties compared with povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®) and other potential antiseptic agents including chlorohexidine and isopropyl alcohol 4.

Currently, two concentrations of HOCl are available for commercial use: AvenovaTM with Neutrox™ (0.01% HOCl) and an over the counter product (0.02% HOCl). Both concentrations are used to treat blepharitis. Debabov et al5 presented toxicity data concluding that 0.01% hypochlorous acid (HOCl) (Avenova™ with Neutrox™) proved to be non-cytotoxic in comparison to the 0.02% hypochlorous acid (HOCl) product which was cytotoxic thus supporting the potential benefit of HOCl.

Stroman et al6 2017 concludes that hypochlorous acid (HOCl)in saline solution reduced bacterial colony load significantly without altering the variation of remaining bacterial species. Additionally, hypochlorous acid (HOCl) has been shown to reduce the population of bacterial and fungal species common to the lids and lashes by ≥ 99.9% 7. Despite the use of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) as a topical antiseptic on the eyelid, there have been no reports of its use as an antiseptic agent for conjunctival procedures. Many studies have confirmed that flora of the eyelid and eyelash only differ in their concentrations 8. Since hypochlorous acid (HOCl) has been found to be effective in reducing colony forming units and since the flora species of the conjunctiva, eyelid and eyelashes are equivalent, we propose that hypochlorous acid (HOCl) may serve as an alternative to povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®) as a conjunctival procedure prep agent. Considering there were no reported negative side effects of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) contact with the eye, hypochlorous acid (HOCl) may prove to be a non-inferior alternative to povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®). This may result in lower irritation and toxicity compared to povidone iodine (PI) (Betadine®)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Eye Infections, Bacterial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment naïve participants First Group L

Treatment naïve participants randomized to receive Betadine on the left eye and Avenova on the right Eye

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Betadine

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 5% Betadine will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the eye

Avenova

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 0.01% Avenova will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the left eye

Treatment naïve participants Second Group R

Treatment naïve participants randomized to receive Avenova on the left eye and Betadine on the right Eye

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Betadine

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 5% Betadine will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the eye

Avenova

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 0.01% Avenova will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the left eye

Participants undergoing intravitreal injection First Group L

Participants undergoing intravitreal injection will receive betadine in the eye that is receiving injections and Avenova in the other eye. Group L are patients that are having intravitreal injections and will receive betadine in the left eye and Avenova in the right eye.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Betadine

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 5% Betadine will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the eye

Avenova

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 0.01% Avenova will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the left eye

Participants undergoing intravitreal injection Second Group R

Participants undergoing intravitreal injection will receive betadine in the eye that is receiving injections and Avenova in the other eye. Group R are patients that are having intravitreal injections and will receive betadine in the right eye and Avenova in the left eye.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Betadine

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 5% Betadine will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the eye

Avenova

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop of 0.01% Avenova will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the left eye

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Betadine

One drop of 5% Betadine will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the eye

Intervention Type DRUG

Avenova

One drop of 0.01% Avenova will be administered to the inferior conjunctiva of the left eye

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Povidone Iodine Hypochlorous Acid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Treatment Naïve patients:

\- Any patient who is able to give consent for the study and did not receive an intravitreal injection in the past 6 months

Patients receiving injections:

\- Patient currently undergoing treatment for which he/she receives a intravitreal injection in one eye.

Exclusion Criteria

Treatment Naïve patients:

* Intravitreal injections in the past 6 months
* Use of eye drops for treatment of glaucoma in the past 6 months
* Use of eye drops with antibiotics or steroids in the past 6 months

Patients receiving injections:

* Patient receiving injections in both eyes
* Use of eye drops for treatment of glaucoma in the past 6 months
* Use of eye drops with antibiotics or steroids in the past 6 months
* Have any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the well-being of the patient or the study or prevent the patient from meeting or performing study requirements.

For both groups:

* Adults unable to consent
* Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
* Pregnant women
* Prisoners
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Miami

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jorge Fortun

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jorge Fortun, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Miami

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States

Site Status

Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20200815

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.