SW-RCT Implementation of Canadian Syncope Risk Score Based Practice Recommendations
NCT ID: NCT04972071
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
14400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-18
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CSRS Implementation - A Pilot Study
NCT04790058
Improving Management of Emergency Department Patients With Undifferentiated Syncope: Prospective Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score
NCT05538143
Canadian Prehospital Syncope Risk Score (Prehospital CSRS)
NCT05560126
Practical Approaches to Care in Emergency Syncope
NCT04533425
Creation of a Syncope Channel for Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department for Loss of Consciousness and Not Hospitalized: Etiological Predictivity (Before/After Study)
NCT06503653
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The following principal research questions will be addressed 1) What is the effect of the knowledge translation and implementation of the CSRS-based practice recommendations on health resource utilization? The health resource utilization measures include the proportion hospitalized, the proportion investigated in the ED, and ED disposition time 2) How and why did the implementation achieve the observed effect? The embedded process evaluation measures align with the RE-AIM (Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance) framework and include: a) adoption - the proportion of physicians who attended the educational sessions and the proportion who adopted the CSRS in practice; b) reach- the proportion of eligible patients for whom the CSRS was utilized during their ED visit; c) intervention fidelity - the proportion of patients for whom the resulting CSRS recommendations were followed d) maintenance- whether observed adoption rates remain stable or increase over time. 3) What is the effect of the knowledge translation strategy on patient safety, as measured by 30-day serious outcome identification, 30-day and 1-year return ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality? and 4) validate the ultra-low-risk criteria in a new cohort of patients and assess if the CSRS can be improved in its ability to predict 30-day serious outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CSRS practice recommendation
Knowledge translation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) based practice recommendations
Knowledge translation (KT) of the CSRS based practice recommendations
The components of the practice recommendations include: 1) evidence-informed systematic clinical evaluation with appropriate history, physical examination and in-ED investigations (e.g., troponin testing, work-up for pulmonary embolism and CT head) for detecting serious underlying conditions and predicting 30-day serious outcomes; 2) application of the CSRS for risk-stratification at the end of ED visit after no serious underlying conditions for the syncope were identified; 3) use of patient information materials to aid in disposition; and 4) the use of 15-day outpatient cardiac monitoring for CSRS medium and high-risk patients upon ED discharge. All the components of the practice recommendations will be applied by the ED physician treating the patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Knowledge translation (KT) of the CSRS based practice recommendations
The components of the practice recommendations include: 1) evidence-informed systematic clinical evaluation with appropriate history, physical examination and in-ED investigations (e.g., troponin testing, work-up for pulmonary embolism and CT head) for detecting serious underlying conditions and predicting 30-day serious outcomes; 2) application of the CSRS for risk-stratification at the end of ED visit after no serious underlying conditions for the syncope were identified; 3) use of patient information materials to aid in disposition; and 4) the use of 15-day outpatient cardiac monitoring for CSRS medium and high-risk patients upon ED discharge. All the components of the practice recommendations will be applied by the ED physician treating the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-ED physicians involved in ED syncope care
* Physician's delegates involved in ED syncope care
* Patients who are adults (aged \> 18 years)
* Patients who present to the ED within 24 hours of syncope.
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-ED physicians not involved in ED syncope care
* Physician's delegates not involved in ED syncope care
Patients:
* Patients who do not fulfill the definition of syncope, namely those with a prolonged loss of consciousness (i.e., \> 5 minutes), Glasgow Coma Scale \< 15 in patients without dementia (or a change in the mental status from baseline in those with dementia);
* Patients with witnessed obvious seizure, or head trauma preceding the loss of consciousness; and those who are unable to provide proper details (e.g., alcohol intoxication or other substance use).
* Patients who had a serious underlying for the syncope identified during the index ED evaluation and those who were consulted to an inpatient service or hospitalized for reasons other than syncope workup (e.g., social reasons such as inability to cope at home, pain due to the fall, significant trauma).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Professor and Senior Scientist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, CCFP-EM, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
St. Boniface Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Health Sicence North
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Hawkesbury and District General Hospital
Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
North Bay Regional Health Centre
North Bay, Ontario, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sicences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Niagara Health
Welland, Ontario, Canada
Winchester District Memorial Hospital
Winchester, Ontario, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Royal Victoria Hospital & Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Hotel Dieu Hospital of Lévis
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Hôpital de L'Enfant-Jésus
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Andrew McRae, MD
Role: primary
Mona Hegdekar
Role: primary
Jean-Francois Borduas, MD
Role: primary
Justin Yan, MD
Role: primary
Taylor Lougheed, MD
Role: primary
Rabail Siddiqui
Role: primary
Amanda Bakke
Role: backup
Konika Nirmalanathan
Role: primary
Stephenson Strobel, MD
Role: primary
Mohamed Gazarin
Role: primary
Xiaoqing Xue
Role: primary
David Iannuzz
Role: primary
Simon Berthelot, MD
Role: primary
Patrick Archambault, MD
Role: primary
Alexandra Nadeau
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3371
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.