Practical Approaches to Care in Emergency Syncope

NCT ID: NCT04533425

Last Updated: 2025-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1297 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-14

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Syncope, or transient loss of consciousness, is a common reason for visit to the Emergency Department and often leads to extensive testing and hospitalization. Using objective risk scores to determine which patients with syncope will actually benefit from these interventions, and which can be safely discharged home with minimal testing, is critical to providing sensible medical care. This study will evaluate the validity of two syncope risk-stratification tools and investigate their impact on healthcare utilization and patient safety, thus improving the quality of care for the 1-2 million patients who experience syncope every year in the United States

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this project is to improve risk-stratification for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with syncope (transient loss of consciousness), in order to better delineate which patients require admission and which can be safely discharged home. Syncope and pre-syncope (the sensation of impending loss of consciousness) are common reasons to present to the ED, representing over 1.3 million visits per year in the United States.

Although syncope is most often benign, it can occasionally be caused by serious cardiopulmonary diseases such as cardiac arrhythmia, acute coronary syndrome, or pulmonary embolism. Despite thorough evaluation in the ED, the cause of syncope remains unknown in over 50% of cases, which leads to a large number of syncope patients being admitted for observation and/or further testing. These admissions to the hospital or observation unit are low-yield, costly, and expose patients to the possibility of iatrogenic harm.

In response to this, two groups of researchers have developed distinct syncope risk-stratification tools: the US Syncope Risk Score (FAINT) and the Canadian Syncope Risk Score. These scores use a combination of clinical, electrocardiographic, and laboratory variables to predict the risk of serious clinical outcomes at 30 days. While promising, these two risk scores require external validation prior to widespread clinical implementation. The study team will prospectively collect data on \~1,270 ED patients with syncope/pre-syncope and follow them for 30 days to validate the predictive accuracy of these two risk scores. The study team will then assess the impact of implementing these scores by measuring their potential effect on healthcare utilization and costs.

If validated and shown to safely reduce healthcare utilization, these syncope risk scores could play a major role in improving emergency syncope care by reducing low-yield admissions and identifying patients who are unsafe for discharge from the ED. This study, entitled PACES: Practical Approaches to Care in Emergency Syncope, will help increase the quality and value of emergency care, and advance the field of syncope research.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Syncope Presyncope

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with syncope

Patients who present to the ED with syncope

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients 40 years of age or older who present to the Emergency Department with syncope or presyncope.
* Subjects must read and speak English or Spanish.
* Subjects must have a working phone number and fixed address.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient who have a syncope mimic such as seizure, stroke, head trauma with loss of consciousness, altered mental status, hypoglycemia, intoxication, or require an intervention to restore consciousness.
* Patients who have a new serious diagnosis found in the Emergency Department, such as death, significant cardiac arrhythmia (see below), myocardial infarction, significant structural heart disease, stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic), pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, hemorrhage or anemia requiring blood transfusion, subarachnoid hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute surgical illness, pregnancy, or major traumatic injury.
* Significant cardiac arrhythmia includes Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular tachycardia (\>30 secs), Symptomatic ventricular tachycardia, (\<30 secs), Sick sinus disease with alternating sinus bradycardia and tachycardia, Sinus pause \> 3 seconds, Mobitz type II atrioventricular heart block, Complete heart block, Symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia (including Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia (PSVT), rapid atrial fibrillation/ flutter), Symptomatic bradycardia (pulse\<40), Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator malfunction with cardiac pauses.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marc Probst

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc A Probst, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UC Davis

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Probst MA, Kanzaria HK, Gbedemah M, Richardson LD, Sun BC. National trends in resource utilization associated with ED visits for syncope. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):998-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.030. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25943042 (View on PubMed)

Probst MA, Gibson T, Weiss RE, Yagapen AN, Malveau SE, Adler DH, Bastani A, Baugh CW, Caterino JM, Clark CL, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Nicks BA, Nishijima DK, Shah MN, Stiffler KA, Storrow AB, Wilber ST, Sun BC. Risk Stratification of Older Adults Who Present to the Emergency Department With Syncope: The FAINT Score. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;75(2):147-158. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.08.429. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31668571 (View on PubMed)

Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Kwong K, Wells GA, Sivilotti MLA, Mukarram M, Rowe BH, Lang E, Perry JJ, Sheldon R, Stiell IG, Taljaard M. Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope. CMAJ. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):E289-E298. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151469. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27378464 (View on PubMed)

Wongtanasarasin W, Nishijima DK, Wood N, DeAngelis J, Storrow A, Schimmel J, Beltre N, Sacco D, Probst MA. Factors associated with incentive redemption among participants in a multicenter prospective syncope clinical study. Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;31(12):1276-1279. doi: 10.1111/acem.14979. Epub 2024 Jun 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38940329 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HL149680

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

GCO 19-0127

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AAAT5903

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mechanisms of Vasovagal Syncope
NCT01791816 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
CSRS Implementation - A Pilot Study
NCT04790058 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING