Cognitive Reappraisal Training for Borderline Personality
NCT ID: NCT04967222
Last Updated: 2025-08-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2024-06-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive Reappraisal Training for Borderline Personality (BPD)
NCT06772831
Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder
NCT00055315
Isolating Mechanisms in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
NCT03408860
Stress & Social Cognition in Borderline Personality Disorder
NCT04504994
An 18-Month Psychotherapy of Borderline Personality Disorder
NCT03329677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The present study builds upon work by the study group that has shown that deficiencies in the ability to regulate emotion by engaging typically adaptive cognitive strategies (cognitive reappraisal, CR) and to effectively activate associated neural systems can be corrected by focused training in CR. The R61 phase of this study examines a manualized intensive training program in CR, tests that it effects target neural systems implicated in emotional processing and enhances behavioral reappraisal success. It examines 2-, 4- and 6- weeks of twice a week treatment to identify the optimal dose. Measures include fMRI imaging and clinical ratings at baseline and each of these subsequent time points. Upon demonstrating that CR training is superior to a control condition in enhancing performance in the neural target at one or more of these dose durations, the study team will proceed to the R33 phase. In the R33 phase the study team will treat a larger sample of BPD patients at the optimal dose defined in the R61 phase to 1) demonstrate reproducibility of the R61 findings, 2) to demonstrate that CR training is superior to control in improving BPD clinical outcomes at the end of treatment and at 1- and 4- month follow-up, and 3) that change in activity at the neural targets is associated with clinical improvement.
The results of this study can support the introduction of CR training as a new psychosocial approach for the treatment of BPD, either as stand-alone treatment or as an augmenting strategy. It may, moreover, have application to a range of psychiatric disorders characterized by severe emotional instability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cognitive Reappraisal-by-Distancing (CRD)
Subjects will be coached to use cognitive reappraisal-by-distancing to downregulate their negative reactions to aversive emotional pictures usng practice pictures.
Cognitive Reappraisal by Distancing
Reappraisal-by-distancing treatment. Participants meet 2 times a week for 6 weeks to learn reappraisal by distancing through repeated practice with negative emotional pictures. The therapist will help model and shape the technique. .
Control Downregulate Condition (CD)
Subjects will be coached to practice their customary emotion regulatory techniques in a treatment occurring twice a week for 6 weeks.
Control Downregulate Condition
Participants either meet 2x a week for 6- weeks to gain added practice, under the guidance of a therapist, using their customary emotion regulatory strategies to downregulate their negative reactions to aversive pictures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Reappraisal by Distancing
Reappraisal-by-distancing treatment. Participants meet 2 times a week for 6 weeks to learn reappraisal by distancing through repeated practice with negative emotional pictures. The therapist will help model and shape the technique. .
Control Downregulate Condition
Participants either meet 2x a week for 6- weeks to gain added practice, under the guidance of a therapist, using their customary emotion regulatory strategies to downregulate their negative reactions to aversive pictures.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who are being treated with psychotherapy or psychopharmacotherapy will be included so long as there has been no change in that treatment over the preceding 2 months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Criteria for Schizotypal Personality Disorder or Avoidant Personality Disorder. SPD is excluded to avoid possible confound from the restricted affect that characterizes SPD and co-morbid AvPD subjects will be excluded because the researchers have shown that their patterns of neural activity in emotion processing are distinct from BPD subjects.
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
William Marsh Rice University
OTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Harold W Koenigsberg, MD
Professor of Psychiatry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Harold Koenigsberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GCO 20-0432-01001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.