Multi-stage Urethroplasty with Augmentation Using a Dorsal Graft Inlay Technique Comparing Graft Use in First or Second Stage

NCT ID: NCT04965025

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-11

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The principal aim of this pilot study is to directly compare both approaches and analyze the failure rate after one year of follow-up. These data will serve as the basis to design a larger phase II or III trial in the future with failure rate as the primary end-point. Other study objectives are thoroughly described underneath.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Urethral stricture disease can occur throughout the entire length of the male urethra and has a wide variety of potential etiologies1. The standard treatment for this condition is urethroplasty, an open reconstructive procedure aiming to restore urethral patency1.

Urethroplasty covers a wide variety of surgical techniques and can be performed in a single stage or in multiple stages1. The latter option is generally reserved for patients with a very challenging disease1 (often including very dense fibrosis and poor local tissue conditions) and is most commonly performed for urethral strictures in the penile urethra2.

In case of a multi-stage urethroplasty, the first stage generally involves opening the urethra longitudinally over its diseased segment and suturing the urethral edges to the edges of the skin1. After that, a period of urethral rest of at least 3 months is foreseen after which the second stage procedure is performed by tubularizing the urethral plate around a transurethral catheter and closing the dartos layer and skin over the reconstructed urethra1. When the urethral plate is too narrow or of too poor quality to allow retubularization, the urethral plate is incised on the midline and a graft is sutured into the defect in order to augment the urethra enough to allow for retubularization after all1.

This dorsal inlay procedure can be performed during the first or second stage1. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that directly compare the outcomes of both approaches and consequently, there is no clear guidance for surgeons as to whether the graft should be administered during the first or second stage of the procedure. Also, there are absolutely no data available to use in a power analysis for a randomized controlled trial investigating this matter.

Against this background, the principal aim of this pilot study is to directly compare both approaches and analyze the failure rate after one year of follow-up. These data will serve as the basis to design a larger trial in the future with failure rate as the primary end-point. Other study objectives are thoroughly described underneath.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urethra Stenosis Urethral Stricture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

RCT with two arms.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Participants cannot be blinded because of the nature of the surgery. Treating surgeon cannot be blinded. Blinding of outcome assessors, data analysts and authors of the manuscript was considered, but lifted due to practical considerations.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multi-stage urethroplasty with graft inlay in first stage

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Multi-stage urethroplasty with graft inlay in first stage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Herein, the graft will be used in the first stage and the second stage will solely consist of retubularizing the urethra.

Multi-stage urethroplasty with graft inlay in second stage

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multi-stage urethroplasty with graft inlay in second stage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Herein, the graft will be used in the second stage and the first stage will solely consist of opening the urethra longitudinally.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multi-stage urethroplasty with graft inlay in first stage

Herein, the graft will be used in the first stage and the second stage will solely consist of retubularizing the urethra.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Multi-stage urethroplasty with graft inlay in second stage

Herein, the graft will be used in the second stage and the first stage will solely consist of opening the urethra longitudinally.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Voluntarily signed written informed consent according to the rules of Good Clinical Practice (Declaration of Helsinki) and national regulations.
* Age ≥ 18 years.
* Male patient.
* Fit for operation, upon surgeon's discretion.
* Isolated penile stricture that requires a multi-stage urethroplasty with dorsal inlay of a graft (upon surgeon's discretion).
* Use of oral mucosa as graft material.
* Patient is able and willing to comply with protocol.
* Prior urethral surgery (dilation, urethrotomy of urethroplasty) is allowed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Absence of signed written informed consent.
* Age \< 18 years.
* Female patients.
* Transgender patients.
* Patients unfit for operation.
* Stricture disease extending beyond the penile urethra or concomitant stricture at a different urethral segment.
* Use of graft other than oral mucosa.
* Any condition or situation, which, in the investigator's opinion, puts the patient at significant risk, could confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the patient's participation in the study.
* Unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol.
* Patients deciding not to undergo the second stage will be excluded post-hoc.
* When the surgeon intra-operatively decides to carry out a single-stage procedure after all, the patient will also be excluded post-hoc.
* If the surgeon decides that no graft is needed to retubularize the urethra, the patient will also be excluded post-hoc.
* If the surgeon decides that a two-stage Bracka repair is needed, where the urethral plate is entirely cut away during the first stage and grafted, the patient will also be excluded post-hoc.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolaas Lumen

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Wesley Verla

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nicolaas Lumen, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+32 9 332 22 76

Wesley Verla

Role: CONTACT

+32498083423

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Wesley Verla, MD

Role: primary

Nicolaas Lumen, MD PhD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BC-08585

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.