Implementation, Effectiveness and Impact of a Value Based Intervention for Patients with Breast or Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04960735

Last Updated: 2025-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1007 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

VOICE project aims to guide health services in their reorganization towards the provision of the highest value care for the patient at the best cost. VOICE is targeted to patients with breast and lung cancer. The purpose is to offer a new innovative strategic framework based on value-based healthcare model to these patients in Europe. VOICE Community consists of 13 hospitals across Europe working collaboratively to implement this approach.

The Community addresses what matters most to patients by measuring patient reported health outcomes in routine clinical practice on a systematic and long-term basis, by including patients´ perspective in clinical decision-making, improving patient empowerment and physician-patient communication, assessing the impact on costs of the processes implemented, identifying factors for a successful implementation of value-based healthcare and boosting knowledge generation and best practice exchange across Europe.

The VOICE ambition is to collect the health-related Quality of Life evidence from more than 1000 patients (patients with breast cancer and patients with lung cancer), by means of health related and patient reported questionnaires (ICHOM, International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurements, standard sets). Hospitals will go further by assessing the satisfaction, acceptability, relationship with professionals or decision-making process with patients.

The VOICE Community will benchmark health outcomes and related costs to improve care delivery of these patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

VOICE is a Europe-wide Hospital Community pioneering in the assessment of value-based healthcare outcomes related to breast and lung cancer. The VOICE Community members have extended experience in value-based healthcare paradigm as they founded the community in 2018 in continuity with in the All.Can initiative launched by International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurements (ICHOM).

VOICE aims to implement the innovative value based healthcare approach for patients with breast cancer or lung cancer in routine practice to transform care provision and place the patient at the centre of the system. The project will assess the implementation process, the effectiveness of clinical practice and its impact on costs grouped by process for an intervention-based measurement of outcome values for patients with breast or lung cancer. As a result is expected to (i) analyse the effectiveness of an intervention based on measuring outcome values for patients in order to improve patient empowerment, shared decision-making, and physician-patient communication; (ii) assess the impact of an intervention based on measuring outcome values for patients on costs grouped by clinical process, and in the organisation of healthcare by processes and (iii) integrate the measurement of value-based health outcomes in everyday clinical practice for organisations both systematically and long term.

This study duration will be three years and a half.

* Preparation period (July-December 2018): the intervention was defined; the data battery to be collected was designed; the systems required for that purpose were developed; and professionals participating in the study were recruited and trained.
* Intervention period (January 2019-June 2020): all processes set forth were activated; patient recruitment and follow-up, as well as data collection started.
* Analysis and benchmarking period (June 2020-June 2023): data collected will be analysed and outcomes will be compared among organisations participating in the study and corresponding dissemination.

More than 1,000 patients were progressively recruited in 13 pilot sites (European Hospitals) when diagnosed with breast or lung cancer. Patients who met the eligibility criteria described below were invited to take part in the study once diagnosed at the hospital. Medical professionals (gynaecology, oncology, pneumology and thoracic surgery consultants) explained the study and provided the patients with the information sheet and informed consent form.

Recruitment was conducted in the first six months and patients were monitored for at least six months or until death, if that occurred first. Intervention outcomes were monitored at different times: at the start (on recruitment which coincided with diagnosis); at 6 months in breast cancer; and at the start (on recruitment which coincided with diagnosis), at 3 months; and after 6 months in lung cancer.

This multicentre prospective study combines an implementation research component and an effectiveness component, using quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection and analysis. Quantitative analysis includes a descriptive analysis of all variables included in the study. Categorical variables will be shown using frequencies and percentages, n (%). Continuous variables with normal distribution will be shown as standard deviation (SD). Continuous variables with non-normal distribution will be shown as median and first and third quartiles (Q1, Q3). Pre and post intervention differences between categorical variables will be calculated with McNemar's test used on paired data. In continuous variables, the Student´s t test will be used on paired data; or the Wilcoxon rank sum test for variables with normal and non-normal distributions, respectively. Moreover, regression models for the pre/post difference will be proposed to assess whether that difference varies from 0. Models will be adjusted by possible determinant factors such as gender and other socio-demographic elements.

The qualitative analysis to be carried out at the end of the intervention will include semi-structured interviews and focus groups methods. Analyses will be performed at individual level (patient) and at organisational level (costs).

Data management will meet the current European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and shall include detailed information on the procedures in terms of data collection, conservation, protection, reuse and/or destruction. The project will only obtain essential data, and will never share patients' personal data or raw anonymous data. Data obtained will be used for assessment purposes, impact valuation and to increase the empirical base. Templates are based on ICHOM data dictionary for breast cancer and lung cancer where each variable is coded and responses are typified.

VOICE will follow the procedures indicated in the new general data protection regulation No 2016/679 that has been recently applied in Europe for the data access, protection and sharing.

The Community partners have signed an agreement to access and to share data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A single group intervention that will collect health-related Quality of Life evidence from patients with cancer from 13 hospitals for six months. The multicentre study combines an implementation research component and effectiveness, using quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection and analysis. Outcomes will be analysed not only at individual level but also at health organisation level.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with cancer (patients with breast cancer and patients with lung cancer)

Health-related Quality of Life evidence was collected from patients with cancer (patients with breast cancer and patients with lung cancer) for six months. The evidence was collected by means of health related and patient reported questionnaires (ICHOM standard sets for breast cancer and lung cancer).

Patients were monitored for six months. Intervention outcomes were monitored at different times: for patients with breast cancer, at the start (on recruitment which coincided with diagnosis) and at six months; for patients with lung cancer, at the start (on recruitment which coincided with diagnosis), at three and at six months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

VOICE intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention consists of four stages:

* S1, Value identification and description of current care processes: Needs are detected from two perspectives: feedback from patients and mapping of healthcare processes. ICHOM questionnaires are reviewed. Patient surveys and clinical forms are developed. The methodology for cost analysis is set up.
* S2, Intervention implementation: Patients are recruited according to the eligibility criteria. Their care follows the current healthcare pathway and information is collected at different time points.
* S3, Assessment of outcomes and continued benchmarking: Data and costs are analysed at both local level and Community level (benchmarking). Interviews and focus groups are held (optional). Root cause analysis is performed.
* S4, Best practice sharing: Identifying what lessons could be learned from the best-performing sites, according to the results of the VOICE community benchmarking and following qualitative techniques.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

VOICE intervention

The intervention consists of four stages:

* S1, Value identification and description of current care processes: Needs are detected from two perspectives: feedback from patients and mapping of healthcare processes. ICHOM questionnaires are reviewed. Patient surveys and clinical forms are developed. The methodology for cost analysis is set up.
* S2, Intervention implementation: Patients are recruited according to the eligibility criteria. Their care follows the current healthcare pathway and information is collected at different time points.
* S3, Assessment of outcomes and continued benchmarking: Data and costs are analysed at both local level and Community level (benchmarking). Interviews and focus groups are held (optional). Root cause analysis is performed.
* S4, Best practice sharing: Identifying what lessons could be learned from the best-performing sites, according to the results of the VOICE community benchmarking and following qualitative techniques.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male and female over 18
* recently diagnosed with invasive stage I-IV cancer, or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
* undergoing any treatment type (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy and/or targeted therapy).


* male and female over 18
* newly diagnosed with lung cancer
* eligible to receive curative or palliative care treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* With rare tumours
* With Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS)
* With recurring illness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital de Cruces

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Donostia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Complejo Hospitalario de Especialidades Juan Ramón Jimenez

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori IRST S.r.l. IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto Portugues de Oncologia, Francisco Gentil, Porto

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Aalst

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

UNICANCER

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Biosistemak Institute for Health Systems Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ane Fullaondo, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Biosistemak (formerly Kronikgune)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Olv Aalst

Aalst, Flanders, Belgium

Site Status

Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest

Angers, Maine Et Loira, France

Site Status

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori

Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy

Site Status

Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Donostia University Hospital

San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez

Huelva, Huelva, Spain

Site Status

12 Octubre University Hospital

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Cruces University Hospital

Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France Italy Portugal Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garcia-Lorenzo B, Gorostiza A, Alayo I, Castelo Zas S, Cobos Baena P, Gallego Camina I, Izaguirre Narbaiza B, Mallabiabarrena G, Ustarroz-Aguirre I, Rigabert A, Balzi W, Maltoni R, Massa I, Alvarez Lopez I, Arevalo Lobera S, Esteban M, Fernandez Calleja M, Gomez Mediavilla J, Fernandez M, Del Oro Hitar M, Ortega Torres MDC, Sanz Ferrandez MC, Manso Sanchez L, Serrano Balazote P, Varela Rodriguez C, Campone M, Le Lann S, Vercauter P, Tournoy K, Borges M, Oliveira AS, Soares M, Fullaondo A; VOICE Study Group. European value-based healthcare benchmarking: moving from theory to practice. Eur J Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;34(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad181.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37875008 (View on PubMed)

Garcia-Lorenzo B, Alayo I, Arrospide A, Gorostiza A, Fullaondo A; VOICE Study Group. Disentangling the value equation: a step forward in value-based healthcare. Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):632-638. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae060.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38878265 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.kronikgune.org/en/european-community-voice/

Description of VOICE project in the web page of the Sponsor

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INT/2020/VOICE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognition and Patients With Lung Cancer
NCT07160751 NOT_YET_RECRUITING