MRI in Predicting Intraoperative Massive Hemorrhage for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
NCT ID: NCT04955028
Last Updated: 2021-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-27
2019-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mri in Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche
NCT03911622
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Clinical Outcomes
NCT05481606
Cesarean Section Scar Evaluation by Saline Contrast Sonohysterography During Hysteroscopy
NCT02865655
Efficacy Study of Random Placenta Margin Incision to Treat Complete Placenta Previa
NCT02695069
2D and 3D Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Section Scars
NCT03111706
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
CSP can lead to life-threatening complications, such as massive hemorrhage, uterine rupture, and loss of fertility. Therefore, immediate termination of pregnancy is recommended once a correct diagnosis is made. At present, there is still no standard treatment for CSP. Current treatments mainly include medical and surgical interventions (uterine artery embolization, suction curettage, local resection by hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, and hysterectomy). At our hospital, local resection by hysteroscopy is widely used; however, uncontrollable hemorrhage still occurs during treatment. It is of great importance to predict massive hemorrhage for clinical decision making.
Classically, transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) is the preferred imaging modality to diagnose CSP. However, patient factors, such as obesity, presence of bowel gas, and pain, combined with operator experience, may limit the usefulness of TVUS. Owing to excellent soft tissue contrast, the capacity of multiple dimensional images, and an excellent anatomical overview, MRI has become an important supplement to evaluate CSP and cesarean section scar (CSS). Sagittal T2-weighted imaging can be used to clearly visualize the gestational sac (GS) and the CSS of a CSP and show detailed features, including the type of CSP, the degree of CSS weakness, and the relationship between the CSP and adjacent structures. Hoffmann et al. studied 25 asymptomatic pregnant women who had undergone one previous cesarean section and found that MRI showed good inter- and intra-rater reliability in measuring lower uterine segment thickness with a low observer dependency. MRI is an additional diagnostic tool that can be used to assess the lower uterine segment in women who have undergone previous cesarean section.
To our knowledge, no previous studies have explored the relationship between MRI and intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with CSP. The arm of this study was to investigate the ability of clinical characteristics and MRI features to predict massive hemorrhage during hysteroscopic treatment of CSP, and to aid the choice of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intraoperative massive hemorrhage
blood loss of ≥200 mL with or without artery embolization (UAE) or local CSP resection by laparoscopy or laparotomy as additional interventions.
No interventions assigned to this group
the non-massive hemorrhage group
blood loss of \<200 mL
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jianyu Liu, Dr
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Peking University Third Hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M2019442
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.