MRI in Predicting Intraoperative Massive Hemorrhage for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

NCT ID: NCT04955028

Last Updated: 2021-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-27

Study Completion Date

2019-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

MRI features and clinical characteristics to predict massive hemorrhage during hysteroscopic treatment of CSP, and to aid the choice of treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare ectopic pregnancy occurring in cesarean section of previous cesarean delivery. The incidence of CSP was 1 in 1,800-2,216 of all deliveries reported in 2006. However, the incidence of CSP is increasing worldwide, especially in China, owing to the rapidly increasing rate of cesarean sections and second-child births since 2015.

CSP can lead to life-threatening complications, such as massive hemorrhage, uterine rupture, and loss of fertility. Therefore, immediate termination of pregnancy is recommended once a correct diagnosis is made. At present, there is still no standard treatment for CSP. Current treatments mainly include medical and surgical interventions (uterine artery embolization, suction curettage, local resection by hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, and hysterectomy). At our hospital, local resection by hysteroscopy is widely used; however, uncontrollable hemorrhage still occurs during treatment. It is of great importance to predict massive hemorrhage for clinical decision making.

Classically, transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) is the preferred imaging modality to diagnose CSP. However, patient factors, such as obesity, presence of bowel gas, and pain, combined with operator experience, may limit the usefulness of TVUS. Owing to excellent soft tissue contrast, the capacity of multiple dimensional images, and an excellent anatomical overview, MRI has become an important supplement to evaluate CSP and cesarean section scar (CSS). Sagittal T2-weighted imaging can be used to clearly visualize the gestational sac (GS) and the CSS of a CSP and show detailed features, including the type of CSP, the degree of CSS weakness, and the relationship between the CSP and adjacent structures. Hoffmann et al. studied 25 asymptomatic pregnant women who had undergone one previous cesarean section and found that MRI showed good inter- and intra-rater reliability in measuring lower uterine segment thickness with a low observer dependency. MRI is an additional diagnostic tool that can be used to assess the lower uterine segment in women who have undergone previous cesarean section.

To our knowledge, no previous studies have explored the relationship between MRI and intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with CSP. The arm of this study was to investigate the ability of clinical characteristics and MRI features to predict massive hemorrhage during hysteroscopic treatment of CSP, and to aid the choice of treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intraoperative massive hemorrhage

blood loss of ≥200 mL with or without artery embolization (UAE) or local CSP resection by laparoscopy or laparotomy as additional interventions.

No interventions assigned to this group

the non-massive hemorrhage group

blood loss of \<200 mL

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients were clinically diagnosed with CSP, which was confirmed by surgery and pathological assessment. Patients underwent local resection by hysteroscopy between January 2015 and June 2019 in our hospital. All patients underwent MRI within 3 days before surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* (1) twin pregnancy ; (2) preoperative methotrexate use; (3) previous incomplete CSP resection performed at other hospitals; (4) Surgical failure with incomplete CSP removal.
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jianyu Liu, Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Peking University Third Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M2019442

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion
NCT03377894 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3