Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-04-30
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Assess the clinical symptoms like postmenstrual spotting or prolonged menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia and its relation to the presence of cesarean scar defects and its characteristics .
2. development of scoring system and correlating it with the symptoms .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MRI in Predicting Intraoperative Massive Hemorrhage for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
NCT04955028
Cesarean Scar Evaluation Using Saline Infusion Sonography in Women With Previous Pregnancy in Scar
NCT05672563
Incidence of Uterine Cesarean Scar Niche After Cesarean Delivery
NCT05900492
2D and 3D Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Section Scars
NCT03111706
Preliminary Study of Uterine Healing After Caesarean Section: CLInico-ECHOgraphic and Anatomopathologic COrrelation
NCT05785559
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
MRI can be used for assessment of lower uterine segment. It provides accurate tissue characterization, independent of patient body mass index .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI
medical device that is used as an imaging tool for soft tissues
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. At least 6 months after the last cesarean section .
3. still regularly menstruating .
4. Absence of other gynecological disease or intrauterine lesions like endometriosis , uterine fibroid .
Exclusion Criteria
2. hysterectomy .
3. Presence of other gynecological disease like endometriosis , uterine fibroids .
4. any general contraindication to MRI as presence of any paramagnetic substance as pacemakers or in severely ill patients or those with claustrophobia, arrhythmic patients .
5. intrauterine devices .
6. bleeding tendency.
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kero Wagdy
resident doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gehan Sayed, PHD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assiut University
Omran Khodary, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Hisham Abou Taleb, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jastrow N, Irion O, Roberge S, Bujold E. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1438. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e24bc. No abstract available.
Satpathy G, Kumar I, Matah M, Verma A. Comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance morphometry and sonography in assessment of post-cesarean uterine scar. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2018 Apr-Jun;28(2):169-174. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_325_17.
Hoffmann J, Stumpp P, Exner M, Grothoff M, Stepan H. Magnetic resonance imaging as additional diagnostic tool in assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):270-272. doi: 10.1002/uog.19046. No abstract available.
Wong WSF, Fung WT. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Cesarean Scar Defect. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Jul-Sep;7(3):104-107. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_23_18. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
Gonser M. Re: Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;44(3):371. doi: 10.1002/uog.14631. No abstract available.
Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Zimmer M. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 29;14:365. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3.
Kumar I, Verma A, Matah M, Satpathy G. Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study. Acta Radiol. 2017 Jul;58(7):890-896. doi: 10.1177/0284185116675659. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MRI in cesarean scar defects
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.