Analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Chronic Pain After Cesarean Section
NCT ID: NCT06704490
Last Updated: 2024-11-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-02-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main purpose of this study is to (1) prospectively investigate the overall incidence and characteristics of persistent pain after cesarean section at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery; (2) Use regression analysis and data modeling analysis to evaluate the relationship between perioperative variables and chronic pain in postpartum women undergoing cesarean section; (3) Analyze the relationship between chronic pain after cesarean section and postpartum depression in postpartum women.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Clinical Study on the Effect of Labor Analgesia on the Postpartum Recovery Outcome of Chinese Parturients
NCT05666024
Chronic Pain After Childbirth - Caesarean Section Compared to Vaginal Delivery and the Impact of Pre-existing Pain
NCT03216044
Comparison of Postoperative Pain Between Patients Received Primary and Repeated Caesarean Section
NCT03009955
Persistent Pain After CS Delivery
NCT01996592
Incision Pain and Uterine Contraction Pain After Cesarean Section
NCT02595333
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cesarean section surgery
Observational research
Cesarean section
Observational study without intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cesarean section
Observational study without intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA grades I to III;
* Full term pregnancy and planned cesarean section with transverse incision in the lower segment of the uterus;
* Pregnant women who are willing to participate in this study and sign informed consent forms.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women who are addicted to alcohol and drugs;
* Difficulty in follow-up or poor patient compliance;
* Has taken other investigational drugs or participated in other clinical trials in the three months prior to being selected for the study;
* Serious complications occur during delivery;
* Unable to cooperate with the research for any reason.
20 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Xianwei Zhang，MD
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tongji hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Betran AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Musana O, Wanyonyi SZ, Gulmezoglu AM, Downe S. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y, Raven J, Wu Z, Tang S, Hemminki E. Cesarean section delivery among primiparous women in rural China: an emerging epidemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;202(1):65.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.032. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, Attygalle DE, Shrestha N, Mori R, Nguyen DH, Hoang TB, Rathavy T, Chuyun K, Cheang K, Festin M, Udomprasertgul V, Germar MJ, Yanqiu G, Roy M, Carroli G, Ba-Thike K, Filatova E, Villar J; World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):490-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L, Hellerstein S, Kang C, Li JX, Zhang Y, Liu JM, Blustein J. Geographic Variations and Temporal Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2014. JAMA. 2017 Jan 3;317(1):69-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18663.
Zhang Y, Betran AP, Li X, Liu D, Yuan N, Shang L, Lin W, Tu S, Wang L, Wu X, Zhu T, Zhang Y, Lu Z, Zheng L, Gu C, Fang J, Liu Z, Ma L, Cai Z, Yang X, Li H, Zhang H, Zhao X, Yan L, Wang L, Sun X, Luo Q, Liu L, Zhu J, Qin W, Yao Q, Dong S, Yang Y, Cui Z, He Y, Feng X, He L, Zhang H, Zhang L, Wang X, Souza JP, Qi H, Duan T, Zhang J. What is an appropriate caesarean delivery rate for China: a multicentre survey. BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):138-147. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16951. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
Sharpe EE, Booth JL, Houle TT, Pan PH, Harris LC, Aschenbrenner CA, Eisenach JC. Recovery of physical activity after cesarean delivery and its relationship with pain. Pain. 2019 Oct;160(10):2350-2357. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001628.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
chronic postoperative pain
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.