Oral Health-related Quality of Life and Masticatory Function After Using Denture Adhesive and Denture Liner

NCT ID: NCT04942262

Last Updated: 2021-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

80 complete denture (CD) wearers participated in the quasi-experimental study. Two outcomes were: 1) oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) assessed using the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances index, and 2) masticatory performance, determined by a peanut particle size after 20-stroke mastication. Denture retention and stability were evaluated using the Chulalongkorn University (CU)-modified Kapur method to classify the CD into acceptable or unacceptable quality. Data were collected at 3-time points: 1) at baseline (T0), 2) after a 1-month trial of denture adhesive (DA) use (T1), at which time the participants decided whether to continue using DA, and 3) 1-month after continued or discontinued using DA (T2).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants The eligible participants were CD wearers randomly recruited from patients who visited the Prosthodontic clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University from 2015 to 2019. The inclusion criteria were patients who had worn removable maxillary and mandibular CDs for at least 6 months. The patients who wore a metal-based denture, had a history of DA use, had difficulty in responding to the interview, or were unwilling to follow the study protocol were excluded from the study.

Outcomes The primary outcome was OHRQoL determined using the Thai-version of Oral Impacts on Daily Performances index. The participants were interviewed whether they had difficulties in performing the following 8 daily activities: eat, speak, clean denture and mouth, sleep, smile, emotional stability, social contact, and carry out work or housework. The frequency and severity of each impact were rated using a five-point Likert scale, and their multiplication gave a condition-specific impact score. The overall oral impact score was the sum of all 8 activity scores. The prevalence of an oral impact was categorized into absence (score = 0) or presence of an oral impact (score \> 0). The changes in oral impact score from T0 to T1 were categorized into 3 types: decreased (T0 score \> T1 score), increased (T0 score \< T1 score), and remained absent (T0 score = T1 score = 0).

The secondary outcome was masticatory performance assessed using the multiple sieve method of peanut mastication. The participants masticated 3 grams of roasted peanuts for 20 strokes in triplicate with a 15-minute resting interval between each test. The comminuted peanut particles were dried and sieved through 12 standard test sieves (Test sieve; Retcsh Technology GmbH) on a vibrating sieve shaker. A simple linear regression was plotted between the cumulative weight and diameter of each sieve test. The median peanut particle size (mm) was the sieve diameter through which 50% of the comminuted peanut particles passed. A smaller peanut particle size reflected a higher masticatory performance.

Intervention An external prosthodontist provided a cream-type DA (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland), and instructed the participants to use the DA cream once a day in the morning and use it throughout the day. They applied the DA onto maxillary and mandibular dentures on the tissue surface using a spot method. The participants had to remove the DA and clean the denture every day after the last meal by soaking and brushing the CD with liquid soap and a soft toothbrush under running tap water. Two gauze pads were used to remove DA from the denture and oral mucosa.

The OHRQoL, masticatory performance, and CD-quality were evaluated at 3-time points:

1. T0, at baseline before using the DA. The baseline information regarding the outcomes was evaluated. Then, the participants underwent a daily 1-month trial of DA use,
2. T1 (T0 + 1 month), after the 1-month trial period of DA use. The outcomes were evaluated with all participants using DA. The external prosthodontist asked the participants to choose whether they wanted to continue or discontinue using DA, and
3. T2 (T0 + 2 months), at 1-month after continuing or discontinuing DA use. At this time, some participants used DA during the outcome evaluations, while some did not, depending on the patient's decision on DA use.

A single-blind clinical trial protocol was created. One of the investigators (B.T.) performed the outcome assessment who did not notice whether the participants continue using DA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complete Denture Complete Edentulism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Before and after intervention, and then allow the participants to decide whether to continue receiving the intervention
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

An external prosthodontist provided with a denture adhesive and knew who continued using denture adhesive.

Meanwhile, the outcome assessor did not notice whether the participants continue using denture adhesive

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

denture adhesive use

Participants were instructed to use a cream-type denture adhesive (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland) once a day in the morning and use it throughout the day. They applied denture adhesive onto the tissue surface of their maxillary and mandibular dentures using a spot method. The participants had to remove the DA and clean the denture every day after the last meal by soaking and brushing the CD with liquid soap and a soft toothbrush under running tap water. Two gauze pads were used to remove DA from the denture and oral mucosa. After the 1-month trial period of DA use. The outcomes were evaluated with all participants using DA, and they had to choose whether they wanted to continue or discontinue using DA for another 1 month. At 1-month after continuing or discontinuing DA use. At this time, some participants used DA during the outcome evaluations, while some did not, depending on the patient's decision on DA use.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

denture adhesive (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland)

Intervention Type DRUG

cream-type denture adhesive available as an over-the-counter product in Thailand

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

denture adhesive (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland)

cream-type denture adhesive available as an over-the-counter product in Thailand

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Polident

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Wear removable maxillary and mandibular complete dentures for at least 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Wear a metal-based denture
* Have a history of DA use
* Unable to respond to the interview
* Unwilling to follow the study protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chulalongkorn University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nareudee Limpuangthip, DDS, PhD

Dental staff at Department of Prosthodontics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nareudee Limpuangthip

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chulalongkorn University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

Pathum Wan, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Limpuangthip N, Somkotra T, Arksornnukit M. Modified retention and stability criteria for complete denture wearers: A risk assessment tool for impaired masticatory ability and oral health-related quality of life. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jul;120(1):43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29195820 (View on PubMed)

Nicolas E, Veyrune JL, Lassauzay C. A six-month assessment of oral health-related quality of life of complete denture wearers using denture adhesive: a pilot study. J Prosthodont. 2010 Aug;19(6):443-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00601.x. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20456031 (View on PubMed)

Ohwada G, Minakuchi S, Sato Y, Kondo H, Nomura T, Tsuboi A, Hong G, Itoh Y, Kawai Y, Kimoto S, Gunji A, Suzuki A, Suzuki T, Kimoto K, Hoshi N, Saita M, Yoneyama Y, Sato Y, Morokuma M, Okazaki J, Maeda T, Nakai K, Ichikawa T, Nagao K, Fujimoto K, Murata H, Kurogi T, Yoshida K, Nishimura M, Nishi Y, Murakami M, Hosoi T, Hamada T. Subjective Evaluation of Denture Adhesives: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Jan;5(1):50-61. doi: 10.1177/2380084419837607. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30975019 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HREC-DCU 2019-068

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Attachment System
NCT04544839 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA