Oral Health-related Quality of Life and Masticatory Function After Using Denture Adhesive and Denture Liner
NCT ID: NCT04942262
Last Updated: 2021-06-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-31
2020-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Investigate a Method to Measure Food Occlusion by Denture Adhesives in Denture Wearers
NCT03345108
Denture Adhesives for Elderly Denture Wearers
NCT04927767
A Study to Investigate Food Occlusion Efficacy of a Denture Adhesive in Denture Wearers
NCT03709810
Denture Adhesive is a Patient Advantageous or Prosthetic Failure During Adaption Period: Randomized Control
NCT06397599
Multicenter Study of Denture Adhesive
NCT01712802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Outcomes The primary outcome was OHRQoL determined using the Thai-version of Oral Impacts on Daily Performances index. The participants were interviewed whether they had difficulties in performing the following 8 daily activities: eat, speak, clean denture and mouth, sleep, smile, emotional stability, social contact, and carry out work or housework. The frequency and severity of each impact were rated using a five-point Likert scale, and their multiplication gave a condition-specific impact score. The overall oral impact score was the sum of all 8 activity scores. The prevalence of an oral impact was categorized into absence (score = 0) or presence of an oral impact (score \> 0). The changes in oral impact score from T0 to T1 were categorized into 3 types: decreased (T0 score \> T1 score), increased (T0 score \< T1 score), and remained absent (T0 score = T1 score = 0).
The secondary outcome was masticatory performance assessed using the multiple sieve method of peanut mastication. The participants masticated 3 grams of roasted peanuts for 20 strokes in triplicate with a 15-minute resting interval between each test. The comminuted peanut particles were dried and sieved through 12 standard test sieves (Test sieve; Retcsh Technology GmbH) on a vibrating sieve shaker. A simple linear regression was plotted between the cumulative weight and diameter of each sieve test. The median peanut particle size (mm) was the sieve diameter through which 50% of the comminuted peanut particles passed. A smaller peanut particle size reflected a higher masticatory performance.
Intervention An external prosthodontist provided a cream-type DA (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland), and instructed the participants to use the DA cream once a day in the morning and use it throughout the day. They applied the DA onto maxillary and mandibular dentures on the tissue surface using a spot method. The participants had to remove the DA and clean the denture every day after the last meal by soaking and brushing the CD with liquid soap and a soft toothbrush under running tap water. Two gauze pads were used to remove DA from the denture and oral mucosa.
The OHRQoL, masticatory performance, and CD-quality were evaluated at 3-time points:
1. T0, at baseline before using the DA. The baseline information regarding the outcomes was evaluated. Then, the participants underwent a daily 1-month trial of DA use,
2. T1 (T0 + 1 month), after the 1-month trial period of DA use. The outcomes were evaluated with all participants using DA. The external prosthodontist asked the participants to choose whether they wanted to continue or discontinue using DA, and
3. T2 (T0 + 2 months), at 1-month after continuing or discontinuing DA use. At this time, some participants used DA during the outcome evaluations, while some did not, depending on the patient's decision on DA use.
A single-blind clinical trial protocol was created. One of the investigators (B.T.) performed the outcome assessment who did not notice whether the participants continue using DA.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Meanwhile, the outcome assessor did not notice whether the participants continue using denture adhesive
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
denture adhesive use
Participants were instructed to use a cream-type denture adhesive (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland) once a day in the morning and use it throughout the day. They applied denture adhesive onto the tissue surface of their maxillary and mandibular dentures using a spot method. The participants had to remove the DA and clean the denture every day after the last meal by soaking and brushing the CD with liquid soap and a soft toothbrush under running tap water. Two gauze pads were used to remove DA from the denture and oral mucosa. After the 1-month trial period of DA use. The outcomes were evaluated with all participants using DA, and they had to choose whether they wanted to continue or discontinue using DA for another 1 month. At 1-month after continuing or discontinuing DA use. At this time, some participants used DA during the outcome evaluations, while some did not, depending on the patient's decision on DA use.
denture adhesive (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland)
cream-type denture adhesive available as an over-the-counter product in Thailand
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
denture adhesive (Polident®, GlaxoSmithKline, Ireland)
cream-type denture adhesive available as an over-the-counter product in Thailand
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Have a history of DA use
* Unable to respond to the interview
* Unwilling to follow the study protocol.
40 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chulalongkorn University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nareudee Limpuangthip, DDS, PhD
Dental staff at Department of Prosthodontics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nareudee Limpuangthip
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chulalongkorn University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
Pathum Wan, Bangkok, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Limpuangthip N, Somkotra T, Arksornnukit M. Modified retention and stability criteria for complete denture wearers: A risk assessment tool for impaired masticatory ability and oral health-related quality of life. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jul;120(1):43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
Nicolas E, Veyrune JL, Lassauzay C. A six-month assessment of oral health-related quality of life of complete denture wearers using denture adhesive: a pilot study. J Prosthodont. 2010 Aug;19(6):443-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00601.x. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
Ohwada G, Minakuchi S, Sato Y, Kondo H, Nomura T, Tsuboi A, Hong G, Itoh Y, Kawai Y, Kimoto S, Gunji A, Suzuki A, Suzuki T, Kimoto K, Hoshi N, Saita M, Yoneyama Y, Sato Y, Morokuma M, Okazaki J, Maeda T, Nakai K, Ichikawa T, Nagao K, Fujimoto K, Murata H, Kurogi T, Yoshida K, Nishimura M, Nishi Y, Murakami M, Hosoi T, Hamada T. Subjective Evaluation of Denture Adhesives: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Jan;5(1):50-61. doi: 10.1177/2380084419837607. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HREC-DCU 2019-068
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.