PROMs Comparing Digital & Conventional Workflows

NCT ID: NCT04986761

Last Updated: 2021-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) analyzed monolithic single-unit implant restorations out of lithium disilicate (LS2) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICN) in a chairside digital workflow (Test) and a conventional protocol (Control). The primary outcome was subjective patient perception in terms of PROMs comparing digital and conventional impression techniques as well as patients' satisfaction related to the final implant restoration among difference workflows and materials. The secondary outcome was to investigate the objective evaluation by a dental professional applying the functional implant prosthodontic score (FIPS). The null-hypothesis of this RCT was that both workflows and the two materials for the monolithic implant restorations had comparable results with respect to the defined outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Digital and conventional workflows for treatment of implant single crowns, and also the material used.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Outcomes Assessor received only data without participant group assigned after the intervention was done by a investigator

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Workflows

Digital and conventional workflows for treatment of implant single crowns

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment of implant single crown

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Digital or Conventional Workflows for treatment of implant single crown and materials used.

Materials

Materials for treatment of implant single crowns (polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks, PICNs and lithium disilicate, LS2).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment of implant single crown

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Digital or Conventional Workflows for treatment of implant single crown and materials used.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment of implant single crown

Digital or Conventional Workflows for treatment of implant single crown and materials used.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

-The participants are in the age of more than 20 years old and not more than 80 years old.

* The participants who have a transmucosal implant system (Straumann TL RN/WN, Institut Straumann, AG, Basel, Switzerland) placed in single-tooth gap in the area of premolar or molar regions in the maxilla and mandible with existing interproximal and antagonist contacts.
* The participants' general medical health is healthy or has a well-controlled systemic disease.
* The participants' general oral health has shown no sign of infection or unsuccessfully treated diseases such as chronic periodontitis.

Exclusion Criteria

* The participants who are smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.
* The participants with pregnancy.
* The participants with a psychiatric disorder
* The participants with a history of radiation therapy at the head and neck area.
* The participants with a history of chemotherapy.
* The participants with bony pathologies such as osseous dysplasia, odontogenic cyst or tumor, etc.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of dentistry, Mahidol University

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Joda T, Bragger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Dec;27(12):e185-e189. doi: 10.1111/clr.12600. Epub 2015 Apr 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25864771 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MU-DT/PY-IRB 2019/DT146

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.