DIStinguishing ChildrEn at Low Risk of Severe infectioN in Case of Febrile Neutropenia-7: Impact Study of a Clinical Decision Rule

NCT ID: NCT04938206

Last Updated: 2025-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-27

Study Completion Date

2024-10-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Febrile neutropenia (NF) is the leading cause of unscheduled hospitalization in children with cancer. Management classically involves emergency admission to hospital for intravenous antibiotic treatment until resolution of fever and neutropenia. However, children with NF are a heterogeneous group with varying risks of severe infection (10-29%). This approach, which is recognized as excessive for low-risk episodes of severe infection, particularly in terms of quality of life and cost, is no longer recommended. Management should move to a more personalized model that takes into account the individual probability of severe infection. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been proposed to facilitate risk stratification, but none are useful in our French population because of insufficient reproducibility or effectiveness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neutropenia, Febrile

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

management reduction strategy

Patients classified as low risk by the DRC who will have a reduction in the management of their post-chemotherapy NF.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The Clinical Decision Rule

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Clinical Decision Rule will be applied to all patients included in the study at different times depending on the type of cancer: at H12-H24 of admission for patients with solid tumor; at H24-H48 for patients with hematological cancer. Patients classified as being at low risk of severe infection by the DRC were then randomized to a control group under standard management or to an experimental group with therapeutic relief. Treatment reduction for the experimental group was started immediately after randomization, in hospital. Discharge was proposed 24 hours later, with follow-up every two days, by telephone or in

standard management

Patients classified as low risk by the DRC who will have standard management of post-chemotherapy NF.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

The Clinical Decision Rule

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Clinical Decision Rule will be applied to all patients included in the study at different times depending on the type of cancer: at H12-H24 of admission for patients with solid tumor; at H24-H48 for patients with hematological cancer. Patients classified as being at low risk of severe infection by the DRC were then randomized to a control group under standard management or to an experimental group with therapeutic relief. Treatment reduction for the experimental group was started immediately after randomization, in hospital. Discharge was proposed 24 hours later, with follow-up every two days, by telephone or in

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The Clinical Decision Rule

The Clinical Decision Rule will be applied to all patients included in the study at different times depending on the type of cancer: at H12-H24 of admission for patients with solid tumor; at H24-H48 for patients with hematological cancer. Patients classified as being at low risk of severe infection by the DRC were then randomized to a control group under standard management or to an experimental group with therapeutic relief. Treatment reduction for the experimental group was started immediately after randomization, in hospital. Discharge was proposed 24 hours later, with follow-up every two days, by telephone or in

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Followed for hemopathy or cancer,
* Presenting with post-chemotherapy NF,
* With social security coverage,
* With parents able to provide appropriate home supervision,
* Consent of parents and child if able to give consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* NF to diagnosis of tumor disease,
* Child with palliative care,
* Child who has had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant within the past year,
* NF immediately following an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant,
* Participation in the study during a previous NF,
* Curative antibiotic therapy or documented infection prior to admission,
* Initial management at a non-investigative center,
* Refusal of the child or parents to participate

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Lille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

François Dubos, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Lille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hop Jeanne de Flandre Chu Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-A01025-52

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PREPS-18-0507

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2018_99

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Febrile Infants Swedish Study
NCT07134751 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Vitality in Infants Via Azithromycin for Neonates Trial
NCT05763693 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4