Effects of Ketamine on ERP/EEG Measures in Healthy Volunteers
NCT ID: NCT04928703
Last Updated: 2023-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-26
2022-12-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Blinded, Four-Way Crossover in Healthy Subjects to Assess EEG After Administration of Ketamine, Placebo and AZD6765
NCT01130909
EEG Studies of Ketamine General Anesthesia
NCT03553758
Electroencephalographic (EEG) Profils for Patients on Intravenous Ketamine.
NCT05949554
Modulation of Emotion Perception in Humans Via Amygdala Stimulation
NCT05292183
A Study of IBRF Disorders of Consciousness Advanced Care/MultiModal Care Protocol in Severe Disorders of Consciousness
NCT02696512
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This heightened focus on NMDAr modulators has lead industry and academia to advance methods to measure these effects. Many studies have been performed using EEG and ERP techniques to measure the effect on brain function of ketamine administration but no study has been performed, to our knowledge, that has attempted to measure the variability and reproducibility of these effects. Furthermore, there is some evidence from the scientific literature and from unpublished results from industry-sponsored studies that ketamine may have a disordinal effect on various electrophysiologic measures, particularly the amplitude of the mismatch negativity (MMN) from an auditory oddball ERP test.
In this study we will run various EEG/ERP tests on participants during a placebo administration and during two ketamine administrations separated by washout periods. This will allow, for the first time, the evaluation of the test-retest variability of a range ERP/EEG measures under ketamine administration vs placebo. This may also allow us to test the hypothesis that ketamine has a disordinal effect on different subjects and this disordinality can be predicted from a baseline (placebo) measurement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Visit 2: Placebo - Placebo; Visit 3: Placebo - Ketamine; Visit 4: Placebo - Ketamine
Ketamine
Ketamine IV administration
Arm 2
Visit 2: Placebo - Ketamine; Visit 3: Placebo - Placebo; Visit 4: Placebo - Ketamine
Ketamine
Ketamine IV administration
Arm 3
Visit 2: Placebo - Ketamine; Visit 3: Placebo - Ketamine; Visit 4: Placebo - Placebo
Ketamine
Ketamine IV administration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketamine
Ketamine IV administration
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Female subjects with a negative serum pregnancy test prior to entry into the study and who are practicing an adequate method of birth control (e.g., oral or parenteral contraceptives, intrauterine device, barrier, abstinence) and who do not plan to become pregnant during the study and for 30 days after the last dose of ketamine.
3. Ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent, abide by the study restrictions, and agree to return for the required assessments.
4. Subject is judged to be in good health as determined by the investigator.
5. Body mass index (BMI ) between 18.5 and 30.0 (inclusive) at Visit 1 (Screening).
6. Ability to detect a 1000 and 2000 Hz tone at 40 dB in both ears, at Visit 1 (Screening).
7. Ability to tolerate the electrode cap for the duration of the testing session.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Positive alcohol/drug screen for drugs of abuse (with the exception of a positive result considered by the investigator to be directly attributable to prescription medication approved for subject use) such as phencyclidine, benzodiazepines, opiates, cocaine, cannabinoids, amphetamines, and cotinine at any Visit.
3. Excessive caffeine use (defined as habitual consumption of \> 400 mg caffeine per day \[\~ four 8 oz. cups brewed caffeinated coffee or tea, \~ ten 12 oz. cans caffeinated soda or \~ two "energy shot" drinks\]), or unable to abstain from caffeine on Visits 2-4.
4. Use of products containing nicotine (tobacco or vaping products) 60 minutes prior to dosing on Visits 2-4.
5. Current or prior history (defined as in the past 6 months) of treatment with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) ligands including ketamine, amantadine, dextromethorphan, memantine, methadone, dextropropoxyphene, or ketobemidone.
6. History of allergy, sensitivity, or intolerance to NMDAR ligands including ketamine, amantadine, dextromethorphan, memantine, methadone, dextropropoxyphene, or ketobemidone.
7. Any impairment, activity, or situation that in the judgment of the investigator would prevent satisfactory completion of the study protocol.
8. History of significant psychiatric, neurologic (e.g. Huntington's, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, Multiple Sclerosis, Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus, or a history of seizures, epilepsy, or strokes), or cognitive disorders (e.g. bipolar, schizophrenia, psychosis), or current (within 12 months prior to screening) psychiatric or cognitive disorders such as major depression, suicidal ideation, dementia, or anxiety disorders).
9. Abnormal medical history, or concurrent conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor designated medical monitor, would preclude safe study participation, or interfere with study procedures/assessments.
10. History of severe renal or hepatic impairment, in the opinion of the investigator or the sponsor medical monitor.
11. Known history of significant cardiovascular condition such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, clinically significant arrhythmias, current uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, angina, acute ischemia.
12. Hypertension characterized by resting systolic blood pressure \> 140 mmHg or resting diastolic \> 90 mmHg or tachycardia defined as a resting HR ≥ 120 bpm or bradycardia defined as a resting HR of ≤ 50 bpm, at any Visit.
13. Hypotension with an abnormal supine blood pressure defined as SBP \< 90 mmHg or DBP \<60 mmHg at any Visit.
14. Orthostatic hypotension consisting of a SBP change of ≥ 30 mmHg or a DBP change of ≥ 20 mmHg at 3 minutes after standing from a supine position at any Visit.
15. Resting heart rate \< 45 or \> 95 beats per minute.
16. A marked baseline prolongation of QT/QTc interval (such as QTc intervals that are repeatedly greater than 450 ms) or any other relevant ECG finding at Visit 1 (Screening).
17. A history of additional risk factors for Torsade de Pointes (such as heart failure, hypokalaemia, or family history of Long QT Syndrome).
18. Current evidence of dysplasia or history of malignancy (including lymphoma and leukemia) in the last 5 years, with the exception of successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
19. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis, or other ongoing infectious disease that the investigator considers clinically significant.
20. History of gastrointestinal disease or surgery (except simple appendectomy or hernia repair), which can influence the absorption of the study drug.
21. Evidence of an infection at the time of clinic admission, in the opinion of the investigator.
22. Received an investigational product or device within 30 days (or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) of dosing.
23. Use of first generation, sedating H1 antihistamines or sedative-hypnotic medications within 1 week prior to dosing.
24. Poor venous access; or have donated or had a significant loss of blood or plasma within 8 weeks of dosing.
25. Known allergy to latex.
26. Prior adverse reaction to ketamine or esketamine.
27. Medical history, conditions, or situations that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude safe study participation, or interfere with study procedures/assessments.
28. In addition to these criteria, the investigator may discontinue subjects at any time based on his or her clinical judgment.
21 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alkermes, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
INDUSTRY
Astellas Pharma Inc
INDUSTRY
H. Lundbeck A/S
INDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Novartis
INDUSTRY
Sage Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Takeda
INDUSTRY
Apex Innovative Sciences
UNKNOWN
COGNISION
UNKNOWN
ERP Biomarker Qualification Consortium
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Cecchi, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The ERP Biomarker Qualification Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hassman Research Institute
Marlton, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EBS-B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.