Closure of Mucosal and Submucosal Defects in the Gastrointestinal Tract Using the Novel X-Tack Endoscopic Suturing Device

NCT ID: NCT04925271

Last Updated: 2023-06-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-01

Study Completion Date

2022-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After removing large polyps from the gastrointestinal tract, gastroenterologists close the new defect with devices to prevent complications like bleeding or the development of a leak. Commonly, this is done with a device called Overstitch, which allows the gastroenterologist to stitch the defect with an endoscope. A new device called X-tack has been developed to simplify endoscopic stitching. In this study, the new X-tack device will be compared to Overstitch when closing defects in the gastrointestinal tract. The two devices will be compared to see how long it takes to close a defect, as well as if there are any differences in complications like bleeding or infection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, the community standard is that gastroenterologists who are familiar with Overstitch start using the X-Tack without additional training. However, a hands-on demonstration session with the X-Tack device in a "dry lab" has been conducted with each endoscopist in the trial prior to the study in order to familiarize them with device before enrollment. Each endoscopist has also participated in a "wet lab" using an explant (porcine stomach) to simulate in vivo closure of defects using the X-Tack system. The device operates in a similar fashion compared to previous suturing devices, which are used frequently by all endoscopists involved in this study. On this basis, all endoscopists in the study report comfort and familiarity with the X-Tack system, and the "break-in" period is not anticipated to affect safety or results during the study. The primary study visit will be comprised of the endoscopic procedure at the time of defect closure and a telephone call 48-72 hours later to assess for complications. Patient will be enrolled in the pre-procedure area. If the patient has a pre-procedure visit, they may be notified of their potential for enrollment in the study at that time, though not all patients have a pre-procedure visit in our practice. Patients will be randomized to closure with the X-Tack system versus closure with the Overstitch system prior to their procedure using a centralized computer-generated randomization. Technical success of closure, time of closure, number of sutures required, need for alternative modalities for closure, and any intraprocedural complications (bleeding, perforation) will be recorded. Any patient with possible periprocedural perforation will receive antibiotics at the endoscopist's discretion. At the endoscopist's discretion, the patient may cross over during the procedure to the other group if they believe that their current closure strategy is failing to safely close the defect. Alternate methods of closure (TTS clips, over-the-scope clips) may be used in either group if required by the endoscopist for safe closure of the defect. After the procedure, most patients are observed in the recovery area for 1-2 hours for any signs of complications before they are discharged home.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polyp of Colon Fistula

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients undergoing closure of a mucosal or submucosal defect in the gastrointestinal tract will be randomized 1:1 to either closure with X-Tack or closure with Overstitch.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

X-Tack

The gastrointestinal tract mucosal or submucosal defect is closed using the X-Tack device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

X-Tack

Intervention Type DEVICE

The mucosal or submucosal defect is closed with X-Tack.

Overstitch

The gastrointestinal tract mucosal or submucosal defect is closed using the Overstitch device.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Overstitch

Intervention Type DEVICE

The mucosal or submucosal defect is closed with Overstitch.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

X-Tack

The mucosal or submucosal defect is closed with X-Tack.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Overstitch

The mucosal or submucosal defect is closed with Overstitch.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \> 18 years of age
* Undergoing closure of a gastrointestinal luminal defect for which a suturing device would be otherwise indicated

Exclusion Criteria

* INR \> 2
* Platelets \< 150
* Ongoing anticoagulation not meeting ASGE Antithrombotic Guidelines (Acosta RD et al, The Management of Antithrombotic Agents for Patients Undergoing GI Endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 2016; 83(1): 3-16)
* Hemodynamic instability
* Ongoing or anticipated pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Thomas Jefferson University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anand Kumar

Associate Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anand Kumar, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Thomas Jefferson University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kothari ST, Huang RJ, Shaukat A, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Fishman DS, Gurudu SR, Khashab MA, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Qumseya BJ, Sawhney MS, Thosani N, Yang J, DeWitt JM, Wani S; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. ASGE review of adverse events in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):863-876.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.033. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31563271 (View on PubMed)

Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Al-Kawas FH, Gordon SR, Mathew A, Levenick JM, Aslanian HR, Antaki F, von Renteln D, Crockett SD, Rastogi A, Gill JA, Law RJ, Elias PA, Pellise M, Wallace MB, Mackenzie TA, Rex DK. Clip Closure Prevents Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colon Polyps in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2019 Oct;157(4):977-984.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30885778 (View on PubMed)

Qumseya BJ, Wolfsen C, Wang Y, Othman M, Raimondo M, Bouras E, Wolfsen H, Wallace MB, Woodward T. Factors associated with increased bleeding post-endoscopic mucosal resection. J Dig Dis. 2013 Mar;14(3):140-6. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23134152 (View on PubMed)

Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20189503 (View on PubMed)

Kantsevoy SV, Bitner M, Mitrakov AA, Thuluvath PJ. Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.051. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24332082 (View on PubMed)

Zhang QS, Han B, Xu JH, Gao P, Shen YC. Clip closure of defect after endoscopic resection in patients with larger colorectal tumors decreased the adverse events. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):904-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25975527 (View on PubMed)

ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Acosta RD, Abraham NS, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Early DS, Eloubeidi MA, Evans JA, Faulx AL, Fisher DA, Fonkalsrud L, Hwang JH, Khashab MA, Lightdale JR, Muthusamy VR, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Shaukat A, Shergill AK, Wang A, Cash BD, DeWitt JM. The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Nov 24. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26621548 (View on PubMed)

Agnihotri A, Mitsuhashi S, Holmes I, Kamal F, Chiang A, Loren DE, Kowalski TE, Schlachterman A, Kumar AR. Randomized trial of gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection defect closure comparing a novel through-the-scope suturing system with an over-the-scope suturing system (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Feb;99(2):237-244.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.07.046. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37536633 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21D.166

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.