Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-26
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of our study is to analyze and compare the visual performance of TG LASIK and WFO LASIK in high myopia and low-to-moderate myopia patients, , particularly UCVA, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), and wavefront aberration.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Wavefront-guided vs. Topography-guided LASIK
NCT05588882
Wavefront-guided Versus Wavefront-optimized LASIK for Nearsightedness
NCT01138189
A Comparison of Fellow Eyes Undergoing LASIK or PRK With a Wavefront-guided Excimer Laser Versus a Wavefront-optimized Excimer Laser
NCT01135719
Wavefront-guided PRK vs Wavefront-optimized PRK
NCT02091934
Topo-guided LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy vs Wavefront LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy
NCT03075176
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Topoguided LASIK
Topoguided ablation profile on dominant eye
Topoguided LASIK
Topoguided ablation profile on dominant eye
Wavefront optimized LASIK
Wavefront optimized ablation profile on non-dominant eye
Wavefront optimized LASIK
Wavefront optimized ablation profile on non-dominant eye
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Topoguided LASIK
Topoguided ablation profile on dominant eye
Wavefront optimized LASIK
Wavefront optimized ablation profile on non-dominant eye
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CDVA of both eyes could reach 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR)
* stable refractive errors of myopia and astigmatism
Exclusion Criteria
* corneal opacities or irregularities
* dry eye (Schirmer's test I ≤ 5mm)
* amblyopia
* coexisting ocular pathologies
* glaucoma
* non-dilating pupil
* history of intraocular surgery, laser therapy, or retinopathy
* optic nerve or macular diseases
* estimated postoperative cornea residual stromal thickness less than 250 μm
* pregnancy or under lactation
* uncontrolled diabetic mellitus or systemic immune disease
* refusal or unable to maintain follow-up
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chao-Kai Chang
Dean, Nobel Eye Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sutton G, Lawless M, Hodge C. Laser in situ keratomileusis in 2012: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2014 Jan;97(1):18-29. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12075. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1396-403.
Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, Boxer Wachler BS, Trattler WB, Tanzer DJ, Majmudar PA, Sugar A; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jul;115(7):1249-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.010.
Stonecipher K, Parrish J, Stonecipher M. Comparing wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided laser vision correction: clinical outcomes using an objective decision tree. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;29(4):277-285. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000495.
Kim J, Choi SH, Lim DH, Yang CM, Yoon GJ, Chung TY. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jul;45(7):959-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
Kim J, Choi SH, Lim DH, Yoon GJ, Chung TY. Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 May 14;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0.
Ozulken K, Yuksel E, Tekin K, Kiziltoprak H, Aydogan S. Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2019 Apr 1;35(4):222-229. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190304-02.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.